You may have seen my comment yesterday about a thread Dunk made, where he attacked a koptalk member, calling him a muppet and gloating about what he (Dunk) thought was a piece of inside information broken on koptalk. Needless to say it’s not, but that’s another story. The thread developed into a discussion about who had left koptalk or not, and Dunk had to close it as he doesn’t like people talking about others leaving. But it was going to come back and haunt him later.
SenorButch, who I believe has left koptalk but is (was) still not locked out as his membership has not run out, logged on to koptalk and saw this thread from Dunk. Obviously he didn’t like what he saw, as he’s friends with the member in question. We’re talking about Selkirk07. He and Lecter claimed that we were not in for Glen Johnson, while Dunk (aka wallet) claimed we were. There was no foul language or anything, just a disagreement. But as the Johnson-transfer is unfolding in the media, Dunk has been all over the place with his “what did I tell you” comments and “Dunk knows best”.
Anyway, SenorButch wasn’t going to see his friend treated like he was, and rightly so. Everytime people question someone for info they’re bringing, Dunk rushes to the scene and tells them to stop it because “they only post what they’ve been told”. That obviously doesn’t relate to Lecter or Selkirk, because what they were doing was passing on the info they’d been told. So there’s one rule if you agree with Dunk and another if you don’t, and as we shall see, an open debate about it is not accepted on koptalk.
So SenorButch started a new thread about it (because the original one was of course locked).
#521883 – June 16, 2009 23:13 We definatly were not in for johnson
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
In jan. At least we knew we couldnt get him. Which is what sel had claimed, and by him not signing in Jan was proof he was right.I do belive Sel didnt rule out the transfer ever.
I always thought this site had a kind of good policy to cut some slack on members pacing info on. Clearly not.
Dunken you have got things wrong in the past, shall i call you MUPPET?
out of order that imo.
though i will probably be evicted for making such a thread.
#521885 – June 16, 2009 23:16 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
StevieJ StevieJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: January 11, 2005
Posts: 825
I’m with you SenorButch – I was more than a little surprised by Dunc’s post.#521886 – June 16, 2009 23:17 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
I do belive wallet and informer and any one on here has also got things wrong in the past, are they muppetts to?Of course not. Sel provied us with some good stuff on here and i for one will miss him
#521887 – June 16, 2009 23:18 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: StevieJ]
Easystrider71 Easystrider71
KopTalk VIPRegistered: January 28, 2005
Posts: 4017
Loc: Crystal Palace
Originally Posted By: StevieJ
I’m with you SenorButch – I was more than a little surprised by Dunc’s post.I must have missed that one
#521888 – June 16, 2009 23:18 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
richt71 richt71
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 09, 2003
Posts: 29017
Butch…Dunk didn’t mention selkirk or anyone else. Evicted? Doesn’t that happen on channel 4 Friday nights!#521890 – June 16, 2009 23:21 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
Naveed Naveed
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 22, 2005
Posts: 9946
Loc: London / Bangalore
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
I do belive wallet and informer and any one on here has also got things wrong in the past, are they muppetts to?Of course not. Sel provied us with some good stuff on here and i for one will miss him
Have I missed something? Is Selkirk no more…?
#521892 – June 16, 2009 23:21 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: richt71]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
Originally Posted By: richt71
Butch…Dunk didn’t mention selkirk or anyone else. Evicted? Doesn’t that happen on channel 4 Friday nights!Imo rich it was plain to see who he was talking about. no names needed.
Now i have met sel for a couple of matches now and hes a good lad.
#521893 – June 16, 2009 23:22 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
richt71 richt71
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 09, 2003
Posts: 29017
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
I do belive wallet and informer and any one on here has also got things wrong in the past, are they muppetts to?Of course not. Sel provied us with some good stuff on here and i for one will miss him
It’s great that anyone posts including selkirk.
#521895 – June 16, 2009 23:23 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
richt71 richt71
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 09, 2003
Posts: 29017
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
Originally Posted By: richt71
Butch…Dunk didn’t mention selkirk or anyone else. Evicted? Doesn’t that happen on channel 4 Friday nights!Imo rich it was plain to see who he was talking about. no names needed.
Now i have met sel for a couple of matches now and hes a good lad.
I’m sure he is mate. There’s plenty of good lads on here.
#521896 – June 16, 2009 23:24 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: richt71]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
Originally Posted By: richt71
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
I do belive wallet and informer and any one on here has also got things wrong in the past, are they muppetts to?Of course not. Sel provied us with some good stuff on here and i for one will miss him
It’s great that anyone posts including selkirk.
That type of thread (dunks one) is what has pushed all the good guys away
#521897 – June 16, 2009 23:25 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: richt71]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
Originally Posted By: richt71
Butch…Dunk didn’t mention selkirk or anyone else. Evicted? Doesn’t that happen on channel 4 Friday nights!he also defended it wasnt lec but didnt once mention sel rich.
#521899 – June 16, 2009 23:27 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: richt71]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15071
Originally Posted By: richt71
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
Originally Posted By: richt71
Butch…Dunk didn’t mention selkirk or anyone else. Evicted? Doesn’t that happen on channel 4 Friday nights!Imo rich it was plain to see who he was talking about. no names needed.
Now i have met sel for a couple of matches now and hes a good lad.
I’m sure he is mate. There’s plenty of good lads on here.
there was rich, ive been stuck between a bit of lurking and away on me hols and cant belive what ive come back to.
even you must be able to admit that rich? where has everyone gone?
#521900 – June 16, 2009 23:27 Re: We definatly were not in for johnson [Re: SenorButch]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 106
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
Originally Posted By: richt71
Originally Posted By: SenorButch
I do belive wallet and informer and any one on here has also got things wrong in the past, are they muppetts to?Of course not. Sel provied us with some good stuff on here and i for one will miss him
It’s great that anyone posts including selkirk.
That type of thread (dunks one) is what has pushed all the good guys away
Have to agree with you on this one butch….thought it was well out of line and this site is all the lesser for those posts.
And that was the last said in the thread before it was deleted. I can’t see what justifies this, other than Dunk not wanting an open debate about the way he runs the site. The days of heavy censorship is not over at koptalk. You can only discuss what Dunk sees fit.
SenorButch started a new thread, asking why the first one was deleted, but this was also deleted immediately.
#521904 – June 16, 2009 23:34 where is my thread?
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15072
there was nothing wrong with it, it was a discussion. why has it been removed?i notice the one that has a dig against sel is just locked, mine deleted.
Why? i pay to be here i, i deserve my right
Choppyman, who just got into the first thread before it was closed, was not particularly impressed and started a new thread asking why it was deleted:
#521903 – June 16, 2009 23:33 Why the censorship?
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 109
Why was SenorButch’s topic deleted but Dunks is allowed to stand….do people not have a right of retort?#521905 – June 16, 2009 23:34 Re: Why the censorship? [Re: Choppyman]
DM DM
KopTalk VIPRegistered: January 24, 2007
Posts: 451
Loc: Ireland
seems to a lot of it going on lately#521906 – June 16, 2009 23:34 Re: Why the censorship? [Re: Choppyman]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 109
It’s easy to slag someone off when there not around to defend themselves?#521908 – June 16, 2009 23:35 Re: Why the censorship? [Re: Choppyman]
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15073
choppyman, im al for banter mate. infact i love it, but dunks thread had venom to it imo
Two minutes and it was also deleted. No discussion allowed. Then Dunk made a (closed) thread about the issuse. Those who missed the deleted threads must have been wondering why he made this one:
#521910 – June 16, 2009 23:36 Johnson is definitely not a target – thread
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7305
Earlier today I posted that thread for a particular reason.It was because I recalled someone earlier this year who was disrespecting other posters with claims that they were making. I found their behaviour at the time inconsiderate and rude.
Things change in football and that doesn’t mean someone had bad intent when they posted. However this poster wasn’t just wrong, that is excusable, they were ignorant and off-putting with their tone to ‘genuine’ contributors.
Today I made my post as a swipe at them to try and flush someone out and it worked. If you don’t understand, you don’t really need to.
All you need to know is that I contribute in a manner that always puts the community first and the good people in it. I have zero respect for those who are here to mislead others.
I would suggest the clique gets over it and if anyone has a problem with this or needs clarification, they are more than welcome to email me personally rather than use an agenda to further mislead others.
So he can’t decide if it was one or more posters he was aiming at. But those who had read the discussions earlier in the year knew that it was Selkirk07 and Lecter who was opposing wallet/Dunk. But Dunk denied he was talking about Lecter (probably because he was afraid he’d also leave) later in his original thread. So that leaves us with Selkirk. But as we’ll see later Dunk will deny that as well.
A few more points from Dunk’s statement above: He’s deciding what his paying members needs to know, and he has zero respect for himself. He also says they’re welcome to email him, which translates into “I don’t want an open discussion about this”. There’s also something familiar about the reason he gives for his original post. He wanted to “flush someone out, and it worked”. This is what Dunk says every time he realizes he’s made a mistake and tries to save it by putting on a brave face. Recently he made a video of himself in his pool, bragging about how much money he had, singing “it’s raining money” and more stupid remarks. When I sent out an email to a long list of koptalk members, telling them they should take a look at that video to see where their money went, he quickly closed the moanvideo site and deleted the video. He then made a new video where he claimed he was making the first video to bait his haterz. That just made him look even more stupid.
SenorButch still wasn’t satisfied with the replies he had got, and he wanted to discuss the matter. So he started a new thread that was deleted imediately:
#521911 – June 16, 2009 23:41 lets be adults here
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15074
dunk, rich, choppyman, me etc etcim a long serving member and have made good mates here.
lets sort things out here, in the open, friendly like. no cloak and dagger stuff.
i can email you dunk, i know, but a discussion is whats needed here.
what do you say?
He made one more attempt to get into a discussion with Dunk.
#521914 – June 16, 2009 23:49 discussion?
SenorButch SenorButch
KopTalk VIPRegistered: September 20, 2006
Posts: 15075 Any chance of it. all this emailing and things get lost in translation.No slagging, or bitching, just produntive.
me you, rich, choppyman, nav.
what do you say?
#521916 – June 16, 2009 23:52 Re: discussion? [Re: SenorButch]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7306 An explanation has been given as to why I posted a particular thread today, it was relating to a matter not concerning you. When people create ‘drama’ on the forums not only does it spoil the place for others who are not interested but it also allows for people to post misinformation. If you have questions relating to any decisions or comments I make then the best place to take them up is with myself via email. I have no problem with you posting my emails elsewhere.I only make decisions for the benefit of all the good people here and people have to trust me with that. If they don’t, they shouldn’t be here, they should be one an anti-Dunk site somewhere where they will be welcomed with open arms.
This time Dunk moved the thread to another subforum, made a reply and closed it. Once again he invites SenorButch to send an email, he is even allowing him to post his replies elsewhere (where the koptalk members can’t see it), but he won’t have an open discussion on koptalk. Also he claims to be the good guy, protecting his tender members from the bad guys. They’re not allowed to make up their own minds about the points raised by SenorButch. At the end he is referring to the anti-Dunk sites, as if there are any. This is an anti-koptalk site. We don’t mind what Dunk does as long as he’s not scamming our fellow Liverpool supporters. As for all the various LFC sites, they’re just LFC sites not anti-Dunk sites. But most people on them detest Dunk and koptalk. No wonder when you see how he treats his paying members.
At this point SenorButch was banned from koptalk. As far as I can see he hadn’t done anything but raise a few questions about how Dunk had called selkirk a muppet, and then wanting an open discussion about it. That’s no reason for banning a paying customer. But that’s koptalk for you. If Dunk doesn’t like you, you’re out. No matter how long you’ve paid for.
Another member picked up on the case. He must have been wondering what was going on with all the deleted threads. For some reason Dunk allowed this to go on for a while, tripping himself up a few times along the way, before he decided to close it.
#521917 – June 16, 2009 23:56 What is all this [oops]?
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool
Haven’t posted much lately due to work related issues but logged on tonight with a nice glass of wine to catch up on all things Liverpool.Have to say I am seriously dissapointed with all the slagging off aimed at Selkirk just because he got it wrong about Johnson. Nobody will risk posting info if they are going to get slagged off for it if it turns out to be wrong. And in any case, Johnson hasn’t signed yet and who the feck knows for sure when Rafa became interested in him. Could have been last week?
This is not how a community works and I recommend a few people take a serious look at themselves.
There are obviously underlying issues here that I don’t understand and quite frankly I am not interested, however, I find it condescending when I am told one minute that we should not criticise people who post info in good faith and then the next minute people lay into Selkirk when he is not here to defend himself.
I sincerely hope that Selkirk starts posting again because the guy talks sense and is one of the better posters we have here, but if I were him and I read some of the stuff posted on here today, I would be off on my heels.
#521918 – June 16, 2009 23:58 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325
Did anyone name Selkirk today? How come people think he’s done something wrong? Have I missed something?
Bad mistake Dunk. Everyone and his dog knows that you were talking about selkirk. Denying it now only make it worse for you. Who was it then, if it wasn’t selkirk?
#521920 – June 17, 2009 00:00 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
Em was this not meant to be a bit of a joke, surely people aren’t taking that original post seriously it was only banter everyone should chill out
Edited by danperkins (June 17, 2009 00:01)
#521921 – June 17, 2009 00:00 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 113
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasions
#521922 – June 17, 2009 00:01 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: danperkins
Em was this not meant to be a bit of a joke, surely people aren’t taking that post seriously it was only banter everyone should chill outDepends on the person’s motives for posting (althought that may not apply here)
#521923 – June 17, 2009 00:01 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Choppyman]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI suggest you read my post about it again. That wasn’t the case or the reason. Please do catch up.
Yes it was. You slagged of Selkirk for posting what he had heard from his sources.
#521924 – June 17, 2009 00:03 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Em was this not meant to be a bit of a joke, surely people aren’t taking that post seriously it was only banter everyone should chill outDepends on the person’s motives for posting (althought that may not apply here)
Dunno why alot of people are jumping on the bandwagon here, there’s loads of banter flying around koptalk every day, i dunno if there’s something else going on but i just took the whole Johnson thingy as a laugh
You obviously missed the threads posted above here.
#521925 – June 17, 2009 00:03 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 113 Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI suggest you read my post about it again. That wasn’t the case or the reason. Please do catch up.
No need for that
Indeed not!
#521926 – June 17, 2009 00:04 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Choppyman]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI’m not taking any sides but i thought it was a joke
No, it wasn’t.
#521927 – June 17, 2009 00:05 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool
Well one word answer Dunc, who was the “Muppet” that you were referring to? OK it can be a 2, 3, 4 or 5 word answer if his name consists of more than one word.I like Selkirk, I am pretty sure it was aimed at him.
It was, but Dunk will never admit it. The fact that he can’t come up with another name proves it.
#521928 – June 17, 2009 00:06 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI’m not taking any sides but i thought it was a joke
It could have been a joke, but the use of the word Muppet persuades me otherwise.
#521929 – June 17, 2009 00:07 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Choppyman]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI suggest you read my post about it again. That wasn’t the case or the reason. Please do catch up.
No need for that
Sorry but you’re pulling me up for something that you are wrong about. I’m suggesting you read what I posted before involving yourself in something you know nothing about. It’s not meant to be rude, just to the point.
He is a paying member who’s in his right to say what he feels about this. And he is right about it as well. You haven’t managed to prove otherwise yet, and you won’t. You were calling selkirk a muppet and you can’t admit it even though the proof is there for all to see.
#521930 – June 17, 2009 00:07 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 113
We can all take a joke on here but that just came out nasty
#521932 – June 17, 2009 00:08 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
Choppyman Choppyman
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 14, 2007
Posts: 113 Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI suggest you read my post about it again. That wasn’t the case or the reason. Please do catch up.
No need for that
Sorry but you’re pulling me up for something that you are wrong about. I’m suggesting you read what I posted before involving yourself in something you know nothing about. It’s not meant to be rude, just to the point.
Then explain what you meant? because it di come across rude
#521933 – June 17, 2009 00:08 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI’m not taking any sides but i thought it was a joke
It could have been a joke, but the use of the word Muppet persuades me otherwise.
Depends on what way it was meant mate ya know, sure if you read any of the threads on koptalk people do be slagging each other off, the word muppet isnt exactly that offensive, i posted on that thread and i was having a laugh too as i assumed it was a harmless thread purely aimed for some banter.
Edited by danperkins (June 17, 2009 00:09)
You were having a laugh, but Dunk wasn’t. He was gloating over the fact that he/wallet had said Liverpool was interested in Johnson, while selkirk and lecter said we weren’t. And with the recent media reports he felt it was a done deal.
#521934 – June 17, 2009 00:08 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Choppyman]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: Choppyman
We can all take a joke on here but that just came out nastyI was pulling up someone who was nasty to others. I was defending the good people. People need to get a grip as I always only post in the best interests of the majority here.
Who then?
#521935 – June 17, 2009 00:09 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: danperkinsDepends on what way it was meant mate ya know, sure if you read any of the threads on koptalk people do be slagging each other off, the word muppet isnt exactly that offensive, i posted on that thread and i was having a laugh too as i assumed it was a harmless thread purely aimed for some banter.
It was a bit of fun but the internet police didn’t see if that way.
Anyway, why do people think Sel’s a muppet?
People doesn’t think he’s a muppet. It was you who said that.
#521936 – June 17, 2009 00:10 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: danperkinsDepends on what way it was meant mate ya know, sure if you read any of the threads on koptalk people do be slagging each other off, the word muppet isnt exactly that offensive, i posted on that thread and i was having a laugh too as i assumed it was a harmless thread purely aimed for some banter.
It was a bit of fun but the internet police didn’t see if that way.
Anyway, why do people think Sel’s a muppet?
Selk dishes out serious banter and takes it so i don’t know why people would think he’d take offense to it, thats even if it was about him?
Banter is one thing. What Dunk did was another. Selkirk wasn’t around to defend himself.
#521937 – June 17, 2009 00:11 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI’m not taking any sides but i thought it was a joke
It could have been a joke, but the use of the word Muppet persuades me otherwise.
Depends on what way it was meant mate ya know, sure if you read any of the threads on koptalk people do be slagging each other off, the word muppet isnt exactly that offensive, i posted on that thread and i was having a laugh too as i assumed it was a harmless thread purely aimed for some banter.
I read your post and I took that as harmless banter, not having a go at you mate I just think there is some underlying nastiness that has no place here.
#521938 – June 17, 2009 00:12 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: TerryJ
I just think there is some underlying nastiness that has no place here.which is exactly what i was addressing
Was it? Why didn’t you say so.
#521939 – June 17, 2009 00:13 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: Choppyman
Selkirk or not ir doesn’t matter…you were slagging someone off for posting what they thought was information for the community. This is something you have spoken against on many ocasionsI’m not taking any sides but i thought it was a joke
It could have been a joke, but the use of the word Muppet persuades me otherwise.
Depends on what way it was meant mate ya know, sure if you read any of the threads on koptalk people do be slagging each other off, the word muppet isnt exactly that offensive, i posted on that thread and i was having a laugh too as i assumed it was a harmless thread purely aimed for some banter.
I read your post and I took that as harmless banter, not having a go at you mate I just think there is some underlying nastiness that has no place here.
Does anyone actually know who the post was aimed at?? If it was Selk he’s well able for the banter, i do agree that the whole nastiness issue has no place on koptalk but IMO i just didn’t see it that way.
It was aimed at Selkirk. Everyone knew it was Lecter and Selkirk who claimed Johnson wasn’t a target, and Dunk denied it was Lecter but said nothing about Selkirk.
#521940 – June 17, 2009 00:14 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
DM DM
KopTalk VIPRegistered: January 24, 2007
Posts: 452
Loc: Ireland has butch decided to leave then
No. He was banned for asking questions.
#521941 – June 17, 2009 00:14 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Sel’s been on today, a few hours ago. I guess he didn’t see anything wrong. I still don’t see how people think it was about Sel?
So you are now admitting that Selkirk is lurking. Seems to fit with the one you called a muppet then? Maybe he didn’t see that post. After all it was a bit down the page as it was locked hours before.
#521942 – June 17, 2009 00:15 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: DM]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenOh it was Butch!! Haven’t heard from him in ages thought he was gone
No it wasn’t Butch. He left a long time ago, but he still had access as his membership hadn’t run out. Asking a few awkward questions hastened his departure though.
#521943 – June 17, 2009 00:15 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Dunk
Sel’s been on today, a few hours ago. I guess he didn’t see anything wrong. I still don’t see how people think it was about Sel?Yup thought as much
How did you know he was online? There’s no “Who’s online” page.
#521944 – June 17, 2009 00:17 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: DM]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenSteve’s contacted him… he was due to leave for pastures new so there’s no shock there. Friends like to be together, nothing wrong with that
Due to leave? He had left. No posts for more than a month..
#521945 – June 17, 2009 00:17 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
richt71 richt71
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 09, 2003
Posts: 29019 Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenOh it was Butch!! Haven’t heard from him in ages thought he was gone
You just missed him Dan!
Obviously.
#521946 – June 17, 2009 00:18 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
drogred drogred
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 06, 2007
Posts: 2509
Loc: Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
Selk was out of order before, not so much to wallet but more to Legin if I remember correctly, claiming that his “source” had left the club and so on.Look, for Gods sake we are ll big boys and girls here, I don’t know why anyone gets their knickers in a twist over a thread on an internet forum anyway.
Yes, we all like coming here and we all like a bit of craic and a bit of banter. Someone was unnecessarily out of order a couple of months ago and got pulled up on it today for being a bit of a know-it-all, it happens everyday in every walk of life. Selk is a big boy and more than capable of either defending himself or putting his hands up and admitting he was wrong.
It now transpires it was to do with Butch (I think), so Ive no idea what is going on!
No it doesn’t. But you are excused. You didn’t see what happened.
#521947 – June 17, 2009 00:18 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: TerryJ
I just think there is some underlying nastiness that has no place here.which is exactly what i was addressing
Dunk, I don’t bother trying to find these sites that you claim are Koptalk haters as I don’t have the time or inclination, therefore I don’t have the knowledge to read through these cat and mouse games that get played out on here.
All I can go on is this:
“no wonder the muppet doesn’t *post here any more
Dunk knows best
* but still lurks”
I am 100% certain that the “Muppet” you are referring to is Selkirk and if you deny it then you are insulting my intelligence.
All I want to know is why you are displaying such double standards in slagging him off so nastily when you yourself posted a while ago warning people not to do the same.
You’re right, but Dunk won’t admit it. It was aimed at Selkirk. Don’t take any more of the insults. Join a better, free site and see how a community actually can be. (If you haven’t already).
#521948 – June 17, 2009 00:18 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenOh it was Butch!! Haven’t heard from him in ages thought he was gone
it wasn’t aimed at butch if you mean that… i was trying to flush a few out to see if they’d bite… and they did.
No, it wasn’t aimed at Butch, but he was the one who responded. Who were you trying to flush out, and how come it worked when in fact it was SenorButch who responded and it wasn’t aimed at him? This isn’t easy to understand Dunk. You make yourself look like a fool now. Or should I say a liar?
#521949 – June 17, 2009 00:18 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: richt71]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: richt71
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenOh it was Butch!! Haven’t heard from him in ages thought he was gone
You just missed him Dan!
Ok cheers dude
#521950 – June 17, 2009 00:20 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: DM
has butch decided to leave thenOh it was Butch!! Haven’t heard from him in ages thought he was gone
it wasn’t aimed at butch if you mean that… i was trying to flush a few out to see if they’d bite… and they did.
They certainly did, ah i personally think if the trouble was all about that thread i just think its been massively blown out of proportion. Its a Football thread nobody should be getting offended by anything said on it
Didthey? Who? I didn’t see it.
#521951 – June 17, 2009 00:21 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: TerryJI am 100% certain that the “Muppet” you are referring to is Selkirk and if you deny it then you are insulting my intelligence.
Please stop insinuating that Sel is a muppet. Unless you can read my mind you have no idea what i was doing when I made that post. It was made in defence of the community here and that will always be the case as far as I’m concerned. I would never post anything bad at a good member but I will defend good members when others think it’s ok to attack them.
So who was the muppet then? If it wasn’t Selkirk or Lecter, I can’t see who it was. Neither can those who responded to your thread. Everybody though it had to be one of them.
But you just called a good member a muppet. This doesn’t add up. Maybe you thought noone would react at that, especially since the one in question (Selkirk) had left?
#521952 – June 17, 2009 00:22 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
JD JD
Site Moderator
KopTalk VIPRegistered: December 12, 2004
Posts: 24706 Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: TerryJI am 100% certain that the “Muppet” you are referring to is Selkirk and if you deny it then you are insulting my intelligence.
Please stop insinuating that Sel is a muppet. Unless you can read my mind you have no idea what i was doing when I made that post. It was made in defence of the community here and that will always be the case as far as I’m concerned. I would never post anything bad at a good member but I will defend good members when others think it’s ok to attack them.
I am a muppet and proud to be one
We know that. I donæt think you’ll many who will disagree with you.
#521953 – June 17, 2009 00:23 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: JD]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 me too
#521954 – June 17, 2009 00:24 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: TerryJI am 100% certain that the “Muppet” you are referring to is Selkirk and if you deny it then you are insulting my intelligence.
Please stop insinuating that Sel is a muppet. Unless you can read my mind you have no idea what i was doing when I made that post. It was made in defence of the community here and that will always be the case as far as I’m concerned. I would never post anything bad at a good member but I will defend good members when others think it’s ok to attack them.
That’s were you have lost me. who was being attacked and who, if not Selkirk, was the “Muppet” doing the attacking?
You won’t get an answer to this question mate. It was Selkirk. Everyone knows, but Dunk won’t admit it.
#521956 – June 17, 2009 00:27 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325
I’ve never seen Sel attack anyone? No more than others give anyway. I know he’s chosen to lurk these days but that’s his call, just like some have chosen their usernames (and we have 15 more to approve!).Fully grown men getting caught up in internet boll*cks that they don’t actually know about. I just want to bang heads together.
People should trust the admin/mods to moderate the site with everyone’s best intentions the only factor. We shoudn’t have to justify our decisions or our posts when pulling people up and if people really do have sincere questions then can contact me or Steve any time.
Silly season? You bet
so why did you call him a muppet? He’s not chosen to lurk. He has left for another site.
15 more members? Where did they go? They haven’t shown up yet, and this was three days ago.
#521957 – June 17, 2009 00:27 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world. Lets just chill out and move on
Edited by danperkins (June 17, 2009 00:28)
Correct danperkins. Two names. Lecter and Selkirk. They weren’t rude as I see it. They claimed their sources said we weren’t interested.
#521958 – June 17, 2009 00:29 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: danperkins
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world.You have a better memory than me lol.
Doesn’t take much to have a better memory than you Dunk. You are able to forget what you said in the start of a setence and contradict it in the end.
#521960 – June 17, 2009 00:30 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: danperkins
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world. Lets just chill out and move onI can’t recall that thread at all, must have been when I was away on holiday.
#521961 – June 17, 2009 00:31 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
drogred drogred
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 06, 2007
Posts: 2509
Loc: Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
You’re so innocent Dunk! Like pastry wouldnt melt in your mouth!
Good call.
#521962 – June 17, 2009 00:33 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world.You have a better memory than me lol.
Ah i remember it vividly cause i felt really sorry for wallet at the time. But sure i think this has been blown massively out of proportion, people need to take a step back and realize that if we didn’t have the banter we do on koptalk it’d be boring
#521963 – June 17, 2009 00:34 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
danperkins danperkins
KopTalk VIPRegistered: April 17, 2008
Posts: 4863
Loc: Dublin, Ireland Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world. Lets just chill out and move onI can’t recall that thread at all, must have been when I was away on holiday.
You lucky git going on holidays
#521965 – June 17, 2009 00:36 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: drogred]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: drogred
You’re so innocent Dunk! Like pastry wouldnt melt in your mouth!
(there were just a couple of smileys in that post)
#521966 – June 17, 2009 00:37 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: danperkins]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: danperkins
Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: danperkins
Well when the Johnson thread originally came out there was few people saying we were interested and others dismissing them (2 names, you know who)and they were very rude to Wallet in particular,he got ostracised and to be fair to him he was very mature about it and didn’t say much and they turned the thread into a bit of a pissing contest. Maybe they’ll eat some humble pie if Johnson signs but a bit of egg on their face isn’t the end of the world.You have a better memory than me lol.
Ah i remember it vividly cause i felt really sorry for wallet at the time. But sure i think this has been blown massively out of proportion, people need to take a step back and realize that if we didn’t have the banter we do on koptalk it’d be boring
he’s actually just posted… that thread will be fun over the next 24 hours
How convenient. All of a sudden wallet pops up and gloat, just like Dunk, about his Johnson info.
#521968 – June 17, 2009 00:38 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
TerryJ TerryJ
KopTalk VIPRegistered: November 01, 2006
Posts: 1771
Loc: Liverpool Originally Posted By: DunkPeople should trust the admin/mods to moderate the site with everyone’s best intentions the only factor. We shoudn’t have to justify our decisions or our posts when pulling people up and if people really do have sincere questions then can contact me or Steve any time.
Silly season? You bet
Dan has given me the answer as to what this is all about, however I totally disagree with what you have written there.
It is healthy to brings things out in the open and discuss them freely and what’s wrong with justifying your actions when it concerns people we have come to know and like.
I’m off to bed.
Things will never be brought out in the open on koptalk.
#521970 – June 17, 2009 00:38 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: Dunk]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325
I’m gonna wind this thread down now. Sorry if I offended anyone. It wasn’t my intention, just sometimes we (the admins) know more than the posters and it’s good to have a bit of banter every now and then. Yes I was sticking up for people but I was trying to flush some out and it worked. I expect more responses in due course
Who did you flush out? I didn’t see anyone, exept SenorButch but you said it wasn’t him.
#521971 – June 17, 2009 00:39 Re: What is all this [oops]? [Re: TerryJ]
Dunk Dunk
Editor
KopTalk VIPRegistered: July 21, 2007
Posts: 7325 Originally Posted By: TerryJ
Originally Posted By: DunkPeople should trust the admin/mods to moderate the site with everyone’s best intentions the only factor. We shoudn’t have to justify our decisions or our posts when pulling people up and if people really do have sincere questions then can contact me or Steve any time.
Silly season? You bet
Dan has given me the answer as to what this is all about, however I totally disagree with what you have written there.
It is healthy to brings things out in the open and discuss them freely and what’s wrong with justifying your actions when it concerns people we have come to know and like.
I’m off to bed.
Dan has given an answer which he thinks my post was about. If people want to ask me questions they have my email address. The reason I oppose such on the forums is because people often post misinformation or didn’t know the full facts, as you admitted yourself as you may have been away on holiday
And then the thread was closed. Again Dunk wouldn’t have more discussion about the matter. He never managed to tell who he was calling a muppet, but it was clear all the way that it was Selkirk. The first reply in the original thread was this, and from there on everyone assumed it was Lecter or Selkirk:
#521507 – June 16, 2009 12:16 Re: “we are definitely not in for Johnson” [Re: Dunk]
RedDom RedDom
KopTalk VIPRegistered: August 08, 2007
Posts: 393
Loc: Isle of Wight
Do you mean Lecter or Selkirk? Haven’t seen either of them for a while.
And you stated it was not about Lecter. But you never said it wasn’t about Selkirk. At least not until much later in another thread. It was too late then. And still there is no explanation about who he was talking about or who he was trying to flush out.
I’ve just read through the Johnson-threads to make sure my memory served me right, and I couldn’t find any attacks on wallet at all. There were disagreements but no attacks. I’ll just end this with a statement from Dunk in the thread where Johnson was discussed in May. Did anyone mention double standards?
Just because one source says something and another says something else doesn’t mean one person contributing is posting in bad faith.
I have little time for these ‘I’m in the know’ threads. Post what you want to share and let people digest themselves. I think if we need to question anyone that should be left up to me as I have no time for pretenders.
Things change, you’re probably all right.
Let’s not lose good people by making them justify themselves every time they post. If you don’t believe someone, just say “Thanks but I don’t believe YOUR source (not you)”. Then everyone is happy.
Official Koptalk Exposed Site 
July 20, 2009 at 9:04 pm
So she opted for the half-brother who can actually see his own cock?
July 20, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Dont know details but aparantly she went back for him
July 20, 2009 at 10:11 pm
I think it would be more believable if he didn’t post pictures of her that shows her wedding ring. Or is he into married chicks now?
July 20, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Anything with tits n a pulse would be my toughts if i were him
July 20, 2009 at 11:52 pm
Can’t have cost much unless you’ve got a fetish for spaniel’s ears – times must be hard
July 21, 2009 at 4:32 am
I keep waiting for dunk to announce that its one big elaborate hoax to trick the haterz, providing further evidence that blog owns him
July 21, 2009 at 8:53 pm
He will never admit it! He is never wrong!!
July 21, 2009 at 9:23 pm
It’s obvious that he attempted to make that cousin of his who he claims to have been banging go halves on a pad,her familly got involved warning her against it and he pt out a couple of threatening blogs (not long after all of his blogs were removed).
I cannot understand why he pretended to have moved out of the shoebox though,the only thing i can think of is that the place is not his,it’s his mothers and she has moved back over forcing him back down to the basement,that would explain why he’s has to move the toys into the tiny space outside.
If i am wrong then who the feck has been looking after his son whilst he’s been out and when he’s laid in bed bored shitless…
July 21, 2009 at 9:44 pm
wheres his shoe box then?
July 22, 2009 at 1:09 am
Not that this matters…
Dumps has been providing his moanvid site with such amazing footage, such as a stolen phone shot of a random girl, drinking alone in a hotel self-serve shop and a long and painful urination scene. Looks as though our boy has either a urinary tract infection or an enlarged prostate. Quality entertainment for his vidiots. When will the fun ever stop?
July 22, 2009 at 5:00 pm
KopTalk items that appear on our non-members (free) website are also included here but more detailed items and various exclusive reports when available are retained purely for this VIP members-only section.
“Items from sources that some members may object to are included purely for information purposes only, to see what such sources are claiming. It does not mean that we support or condone negative sources.
If you find an article of interest that we haven’t included today, please email the link to news@koptalk.com ”
This is the shitbags way of explaining articles posted and his continued support of the rag.
July 22, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Hi
I have been a member of Koptalk for 7 years, I have been following this site for a couple of months and not sure what to make of it all?
I am starting to feel fleeced, koptalk has definitely went down hill with all the departures. I never went on for the insider stuff just for the banter and the community, but there isn’t one now.
I still need my liverpool fix everyday, are there any other liverpool sites that you can recommend. I would love to go to the site where alot of the ex-koptalk members have gone – kop, selkirk, lector, cat, SenorButch?
July 22, 2009 at 10:17 pm
If you have paid for 7 years then I’d say you have been tricked, yes. However it’s never too late to get out. SEnd me an e-mail and I’ll see what I can do for you.
July 22, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Hello Have_I_been_Tricked.
Yes. In answer to your question.
I’ve been a member of KT since February 2001.
You’ve been fleeced and so have thousands of other subscribers and it needs to stop. The issue here is not about whether previous posters have a grudge or an “issue” but something with which other current posters “are comfortable”.
I may get abuse from my fellow friends here, but KT used to be good and I liked it there. Our mates (and a few that were obviously our antagonists) were dueling daily on a myriad of issues and it was fun. Now most of those intellectual and sensible posters are gone and KT is like a wasteland. Since April, it’s been dead. Certainly since some of the more influential posters left, it’s been very quiet and un-enjoyable…
Look to the right. There are a plethora of LFC supporter websites you can join for nothing and what’s more, you can bring your mates with you (if you have mates).
Talk to your pals — (use the PM function — available on every LFC supporters’ website). You’ll land on your feet, I assure you.
🙂
July 22, 2009 at 10:40 pm
There are no PM’s on koptalk. Haven’t been for years. If there was Dunk would no longer be able to control what members say to each other.
July 22, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Get out sooner rater than later! You pay money when all the decent posters are on other sits anyway!! Slowly but surely Koptalk is shrinking down in size and will be worth nothing to Duncan soon!!
Doesn’t the fact that Steve has done a runner explain everything!! Not sure which other admins have left over the years but surely Steve going says it all
July 23, 2009 at 12:32 am
Oh Dear, “the informer” is at it again
Sneijder agent holding talks with Liverpool tomorrow. This will be a senior Liverpool FC official and not an agent representing the club.
Valencia say David Silva is no longer available but his agent has already agreed personal terms with Liverpool. He’s due to give an exclusive interview with a high profile Spanish journalist this month when he will be asked about Liverpool as it is an arranged question. He is in contact with Fernando Torres on an almost daily basis.
Arrangements have been made for Alberto Aquilani to visit Melwood while the squad is away but they cannot be finalized until tomorrow. Tomorrow could prove interesting on several fronts but with Alonso’s future still not finalized we may witness more delays. Bad feelings are starting to form towards Alonso from senior first team players which is understandable so it’s important that this is worked through soon. Rafael though is refusing to move on his valuation of Alonso.
For the Love of God koptalkers, get out now and save yourselves. ButchOdowd was the only one to call this post bullshit and then all the kiss arses piled up on him. Who the hell is this danperkins and naveed ? they couldnt have their heads any further up dunks arse.
Its time for name and shame now and for some of these imposters to be called out for propping up this sham.
July 23, 2009 at 3:04 am
Dunk wants people to think he’s still living in Spain. Dunk continues to use recycled images from his son’s last visit earlier this year.
Shameful exploitation
July 23, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Looks like The Informer(Dunk) got impatient and got carried away with himself a bit with that crap. Informers on the other LFC forums(not ones that scam and lie) just say their bit and leave it at that and you wait for it to happen.
Dunk just does not have a clue what is going on and the above info is a desperate attempt from a desperate man.
One week Silva is nailed on and next Valencia are keeping him so he covers himself with that. Sneijder and Aquilani are both central midfielders and no chance will we go for both and Aquilani will only be shown around Melwood when he signs up. More bullshit lies.
The funniest part is this nothing statement “Tomorrow could prove interesting on several fronts but with Alonso’s future still not finalized we may witness more delays”.
So nothing will happen tomorrow!!!!
July 23, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Bosco Says:
July 23, 2009 at 3:04 am
Dunk wants people to think he’s still living in Spain. Dunk continues to use recycled images from his son’s last visit earlier this year.
Shameful exploitation
I can confirm he is stil living in Spain and they are not recycled images
July 24, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Its irrelevant where he is living when he is still using the same tactics to con the fuck out of people
“At the end of the day the majority are happy and those who aren’t can vote with their pockets as to whether they want to support our website, which to me, is more of a family. It is far deeper than just transfer news.
We all make our own minds up. I wouldn’t be a part of something that I had no faith. I try to oversee things sensibly and fairly.
KopTalk has loads of journalists as members (from the nationals) and we have members who have been involved in senior management positions/roles/deals. We also have former and current player contributions and let’s not forget we were the only LFC site in the world invited to Montreal and Dallas.
There are many lurkers here who are associated to the club but are put off by some of the negative posters, not the ones who express an opinion such as “I can’t see it myself” but those who basically imply someone is a liar.
We came close to losing a key contributor recently because they feel they are here to help yet they get stick. I believe people need a thick skin but I also believe that every member should be respected, unless he’s a tool and I know there’s a couple of them although they claim to be no longer here but they log on daily.
Enjoy the site, take everything with a pince of salt and be assured that I put in 100% all of the time for you, all season.
YNWA “
July 24, 2009 at 10:28 pm
just a question …
he ordered the car from a dealer in Spain ….
Spain cars are left hand drive
he is driving a right hand drive car
Could it be a car that has been brought over from the UK? probably his mother’s – after all she owns the house he lives in – with his taste in shagging his family members, probably had to go down on his mam to use her car!!!
July 24, 2009 at 10:44 pm
interesting ……..
He has a magic car …..
Left hand drive
http://www.moarvideo.tv/video/early-start
Right hand drive
http://www.moarvideo.tv/video/good-moar-ning
Or are these just rental cars … and just more proof of his lies?
July 24, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Hello Duncon,
This site is aimed at current Koptalkers who want the other side of the equation and I think while “shagging family members’ might indeed be the case (I have no comment on this), it’s important for current KT-ers to know that Duncan is living high on the hog taking money from you and you’ve got better alternatives. Many of your mates are on other sites and have transferred (in the past and more recently) and you need to do the same and stop supporting a site that’s on it’s way out.
YNWA
July 25, 2009 at 6:00 am
The stupid bastard is still begging for donations on that moar video and doing vlogs about his pending visits to New York, Nevada and New Orleans. Just like he wont be at the scum game, he wont be visiting America anytime soon.
July 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm
I guess this more or less proves The Informer is talking bullshit:
#543898 – July 22, 2009 17:48 Xabi Alonso not injured
The_Informer The_Informer
KopTalk VIP
Registered: October 15, 2007
Posts: 81 I was speaking to a club official today and he said that Xabi does not have an ankle injury.
Real Madrid and Liverpool are still talking.
Alonso has confirmed himself that he has been injured, but Dunk knows best, eh….