Dream dream dream – Dunk and his "family"

(Warning: This is a long post).

Half an hour browsing around Koptalk yesterday afternoon gave me such a laugh. This was before I saw Dunk post his letter from the Irish businessman. As you probably know, unless you’re a new reader, this blog was set up to poke fun at a morbidly obese liar who took money from unsuspecting Reds in return for stories he made up about goings on at Anfield.

In no time at all it soon became clear that Oldham had no inside information whatsoever, he had not one single contact at the club. But it also became clear that Oldham’s “sins” were much more serious than pretending he had regular tea and cake with Rick Parry.

We also found his love of The S*n stretched further than him wearing a hat advertising the hated rag in France during the 1998 World Cup.

All of this is on the blog, accessible either by using the search button or using the quick links at the top of the page.

My half-hour had started off like days of old. Dunk lies to his members, telling them (or hinting) that he knows what’s happening inside the club. But he makes it all up as he goes along, and forgets most of it. In the old days this wasn’t much of a problem – if anyone questioned him about one of his old “exclusives” he’d just delete the question. Or on a generous day he’d give a quick fob-off for an answer, deleting the thread soon after, before too many got suspicious. And there’d be little evidence of his “exclusive” from those prior months. He’d make sure the posts didn’t stick around too long.

Yesterday one of his members remembered what Dunk had promised him. At the moment it’s impossible to tell who is a trusting member of Koptalk and who is a member fully-versed in Dunk’s scams and asking questions in mock innocence. I’ve no idea which of those “Dave100” counts as, or if he’s one those members who have started to wonder what the hell is going on inside the site they pay £30 for. Dunk had promised more information would be forthcoming in the second week of May about West Ham’s Tevez. But Dunk forgot, because Dunk’s a rather thick bungling idiot.

If he had a brain there’d be less material for the blog…


#161033 – Today at 11:58 AM
Dunk, 2nd Week in May
Dave100 Dave100
KopTalk Member
Registered: 23/10/03
Posts: 5999
Loc: Wigan
…option on Tevez?

We are into that 2nd week now.

Any news?

Or will it be after Sunday’s game do you think?

Cheers
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
(Cut to Wallsend and Steve has to use the wrong end of the broom handle to wake the gross liar from his slumbers. Removing his ear-plugs now that fatty has finally ceased snoring, the young apprentice points at the computer screen. Dunk has to think fast. And for someone who has trouble thinking, that’s a big ask…)

#161039 – Today at 12:01 PM
Re: Dunk, 2nd Week in May [Re: Dave100]
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com
Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18773
My thoughts were that we’d hear something around the 15th which a key date for us. However with us now reaching the final this changes things (in my opinion) so we may have to wait until after the final for these things to be addressed by the management.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
(Even by your standards that’s poor Dunk. First of all, the 15th is actually in the third week of May, not the second, but the rest of it is absolute shite. We know you make things up, and this proves it. So Liverpool are going to turn round to the clubs of potential targets and say, “Oh, would you mind awfully if we didn’t talk about signings until after Athens? Could you tell other interested clubs to hang back as well? What’s that? Yes, I know we were discussing it right in the middle of the season, but this one extra match, big as it is, means we’ve got to stop chatting about transfers.” I’ve heard Rick Parry getting some stick today, and in the absence of answers to some of the questions asked it might turn out to be justified, but even Mr Parry’s not that inept. Poor show Dunk, poor show. “Dave100” pretends (I assume) to agree…)
#161044 – Today at 12:03 PM
Re: Dunk, 2nd Week in May [Re: Dunk]
Dave100 Dave100
KopTalk Member
Registered: 23/10/03
Posts: 5999
Loc: Wigan
Ok, thanks

I thought as much. Don’t want to unsettle the squad before the CL final i guess.

Stay focused and all that.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
(‘Phew!’ thinks lardy, ‘I’ve got away with it.’)
#161050 – Today at 12:05 PM
Re: Dunk, 2nd Week in May [Re: Dave100]
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com

Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18773
Makes sense doesn’t it 🙂
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
(Er, let me think. Makes sense? Does it bollocks.)

The following post made me laugh. Some people reading this will know why.


#160554 – Yesterday at 10:10 PM
big problem 4 me
wezo23 wezo23

KopTalk Member

Registered: 18/10/04
Posts: 3290
Loc: carrickmacross
im due to fly out on sunday morning from ireland to go see liverpool play charlton on sunday. but i cant find my passport. i have searched high and low in the house and cant find it anywhere. had it for sure in march when we went to rome. any tips?????

I don’t want to comment much further than to say that this person has been mentioned on the blog before. He’s a victim who knows he’s a victim of Dunk’s scams. Think “ticket tout” and “FA Cup Final” and “£1600” plus “For Lauren”. And yet he goes back for more. I think anyone asking a forum for help on where he might have put his passport is probably beyond help, and proof of why Dunk’s found it so easy to rip so many people off…

Then I found this. What was Dunk doing, offering CL tickets for £1? Or to be more accurate, my thought process was more along the lines of, “What does the fat liar really mean by this?” It soon became clear…


#161001 – Today at 11:40 AM
Champions League Final tickets for £1?
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com

Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18773
Coming up later today… your chance to win Champions League final tickets in the Liverpool section!
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
(And a quick comment from underage Katrina…)

#161009 – Today at 11:45 AM Re: Champions League Final tickets for £1?
Katie Katie Administrator
KopTalk.com

Registered: 11/07/06
Posts: 4026
Loc: UK
Are you serious? Why have I not been told about this? Can I not buy it if I pay £2??? 😉
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

(A couple of other comments appeared before in walked fat boy once again. It later turned out that this comment was about the Irish businessman he thinks was winding him up…)
#161032 – Today at 11:58 AM
Re: Champions League Final tickets for £1? [Re: Katie]
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com

Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18773
I don’t have any tickets to sell – sorry.

We did receive a lovely email yesterday from a member of our ‘fan club’ pretending to be a businessman after flights and tickets… you can take the member out of KopTalk but you can’t take KopTalk out of the member
– – ———————-

I’ve just read that last comment again and can’t quite work out what Dunk meant. He’s saying that one of those many people that can’t stand him or his scams had emailed him pretending to be someone else. Using an alias perhaps? Claiming things that weren’t true, maybe? So why is Dunk saying “you can take the member out of KopTalk but you can’t take KopTalk out of the member”? I read that this way: If you become a Koptalk member, you learn about telling mistruths, or lies, and even when you leave, you’ll still be telling lies and so on. Is that what he meant? Is he admitting that Koptalk is run on a bed of lies? Or did he mean something else, but his thickness tripped him up? Who knows? Dunk doesn’t.

Shortly afterwards he posted the email from the businessman. Probably a bit of a backfire to do so, but Dunk rarely gets anything right.

Then again, he’s not the only one. Here’s another exciting post from the £30 members’ only website that nobody wants to join…


#161168 – Today at 01:10 PM
FLMAO
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com

Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18773
Just heard this from the next room to me…

“**** me! It’s printing 1173 pages, how do I stop it?!”

KopTalk… no. 1 for getting things right

So, after composing myself again at such a mirth-bringing post I started to wonder what the 1173 pages might have been from. Stolen credit card details from those trying to book flights through his scammy offer? Personal details taken illegally last summer by the anti-Red site from members who would not be allowed to use the product they’d paid for until they’d complied with these new rules (including the “post once a month or you’re out” rule)? Or was it the affiliate terms and conditions for the Virgin Games website fatty was using for his offer of tickets for £1? You see generous fatty was actually asking his members to sign up to Virgin Games’ Poker website, depositing whatever minimum they require. As part of this, Virgin Games have a game where you can win CL tickets. So you download the software (after clicking on the link that includes Fatty’s affiliate code) and fatty pockets a load of commission.

With any other site we’d not have a problem. But this is fatty, and he tries to sell this whole idea as if he’s got the tickets to start with, then gradually admits he hasn’t. But he never admits that he’ll get commission for everyone who signs up and deposits money. Or that it’s likely to cost each member much more than £1 to be able to enter the competition, after they’ve made minimum deposits.

But I don’t think he actually read the Terms and Conditions of the agreement he has with Virgin Games.

If you look at the Virgin Games website you can see those Ts&Cs, at http://www.virgingames.com/affiliates/Terms.aspx. Notably these sections (I’ve added my own emphasis for what I consider applies most to Oldham…)

You should not apply to our Affiliate Program if you do not agree with the following terms and conditions. If you have any queries about the content of this Agreement, please email us at affiliates@virgingames.com.

7.3. We may reject your application if we determine in our sole discretion that your website is not suitable for the our Affiliate Program for any reason, including but not limited to: inclusion of content on your website that we consider is in any way unlawful, harmful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, harassing, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable. By way of example only, this may include:

1. sexually explicit, pornographic or obscene content (whether in text or graphics);
2. speech or images that are offensive, profane, hateful, threatening, harmful, defamatory, libellous, harassing or discriminatory (whether based on race, ethnicity, creed, religion, gender, sexual orientation, physical disability or otherwise);
3. graphic violence;
4. politically sensitive or controversial issues or
5. any unlawful behaviour or conduct.

7.4. We shall reject your application if:

1. your website is designed to appeal to minors;
2. your website infringes or appears to infringe any intellectual property rights;
3. your website does not match the website design, architecture, content or target standards we require of our revenue share Affiliates. Such standards exclude, for example: confusing navigation, heavy loading, design inconsistencies, lack of/scarce use of written/editorial content, low traffic ratings or non gaming targeted traffic (we may advise you to apply to our CPA network partner instead);
4. your website is under construction;
5. your website is hosted in a jurisdiction where online gaming advertising is prohibited by law; or
6. you are already a registered Affiliate on our Affiliate Program.

In other words, Duncan Oldham should not have applied to this affiliate programme. So if you’ve time, please email the address above and warn Mr Branson’s lot that they’ve a fat copyright stealing liar promoting their product in a fairly misleading way, on his porn-ridden site full of threats towards anyone who disagrees with him. You get the idea. The more people who get in touch with them the quicker they’ll deal with him.

Richard Branson doing business with the charity thief that is Duncan Oldham? I somehow don’t think he’d like that.

This next one was funny too….

#161381 – Today at 05:25 PM
FAO Dunk
Hall10 Hall10
KopTalk Member

Registered: 05/09/06
Posts: 105
Dunk, With the possibility of “Ged” becoming Newcastle manager, and with Owen already there and their possible signing of Cisse…. Will you be switching clubs and starting BARCODETALK.COM??? 😀
— — — — — — — — —
#161385 – Today at 05:31 PM Re: FAO Dunk [Re: Hall10]
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com
Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18789 Now it’s funny you should say that

I’ve been asked to help with loads of football club websites in the past including Newcastle. Sadly when I told people this a few members of my ‘fan club’ on other sites tried to make a big deal out of this. I’ve tested the water and have an interest in a few live projects but it’s a big secret so don’t tell anyone

I’d love to see Ged back though but not at Newcastle as he deserves better.
— — — — — — — — —

So the story changes again. Dunk alternates constantly between admitting he had set up a Newcastle website and a Spurs website, and saying he only offered advice after “being approached for help”. He sometimes claims he had a site planned for, of all teams, Nottingham Forest! The truth is that he set up site for Spurs, and a site for Newcastle. Neither got many hits, and one of them was based on software he hadn’t paid for. He closed both down a year ago.

It was some time later that he applied for a licence from the Premier League to use photographs of Premier League football games on his site. He lied on his application. If you’ve time, can you ring the Premier League and tell them he doesn’t have numerous sites covering numerous football clubs? He only has the LFC site, and that means he should have got permission from LFC, not the Premier League. It’s LFC’s decision how much he should pay for the licence, not the Premier League’s, if his site only features LFC! He lied to the Premier League to get his licence.

Give them a call, tell them the truth, and mention to them that he also thinks the licence includes the actual fees for the use of each photo too. It doesn’t, and he uses those photos without paying for them. Copyright theft.

Shortly afterwards I noticed he had changed the page talking about the flights to Athens. This was a little after I’d had an email from Trading Standards saying they were looking into this offer. Perhaps he’d been warned about the credit card stuff.

Looks like one member doesn’t want to pay £30 for a complete pile of crap…

#161623 – 24 minutes 22 seconds ago
Yo Dunk..(possible goodbye to everyone)
Vish Vish
KopTalk Member

Registered: 12/05/04
Posts: 762
Just catching up on my email since my long holiday and have noticed i’m about 2 days away from my subscription ending. I am having second thoughts as whether to renew only because I am a little concerned at the value for money aspect. £30 is a alot of money (especially to a newly graduated unemployed lazy cnut like me).

Any new plans for this summer or up-coming seasons? I do like the fact that there’s loads of videos on here and I can easily catch up with stuff if I’m out the country etc.

Are other members having second thoughts whether to renew? No hidden agendas here Dunk, been around for a while here now just thought i’d weigh up my options if thats cool. If i am going i’ll just take an opportunity to thank everyone at Koptalk plus the excellent contributors for making this a top site
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
#161635 – 6 minutes 0 seconds ago
Re: Yo Dunk..(possible goodbye to everyone) [Re: Vish]
Dunk Dunk Administrator
KopTalk.com
Registered: 20/08/04
Posts: 18806 If you’re genuinely unemployed and a bit skint then we can help you. The site isn’t about squeezing money out of our members, it’s about ticking over.(My arse!) For less than 9p-a-day I know it’s worth it because of the amount of time we put in but I guess i’m going to say that 🙂 (And we’re off again, starry-eyed Dunk actually believing people still fall for this crap)

There are plenty of other LFC sites on the web that are supported by donations or advertising, or they have a team (group of friends) that chip in to pay the bills. Sadly I’m on my own with the help of family and friends and I’ve chosen to have an optional membership and the site was free to all from 1998/99 until we switched to subs.(Was this during the dot com boom that made you those millions you turned down, or whatever it is you normally drone on about?)

Contrary to popular belief, that means we take less revenue than when we were open to all.(Are you still unwaged, or have you stopped claiming that now? It’s hard to say you’re unwaged when you spend so much on cars and gadgets, without drawing attention to the lack of proof Lauren ever got the money you’d collected for her.) If it was about money I would make the site open to all and rake it in on the ad revenue.(You normally claim there is no money in net ads any more. Like the S*n ones you ran, but not just those. So why’s that story changed again?) The reason I prefer it this way is that it helps keep out rival fans and other idiots. (You mean it makes it harder for anyone to spread the word about you. You prefer to keep them in your little concentration camp instead, where they can’t speak to each other without being watched!) Since we’ve gone members only we’re also online every minute of every day overseeing things.(He means he has NY drop-out Smoove logged on overnight, and 17-year-old UK college drop-out Katrina on during the day, with him and his dopey step-bro doing the rest of the shifts. Why? Because they need to swoop on suicide posts as quickly as possible, they can’t afford many more people to see the anger they’ve caused.)

Since going members only we have stepped up to the best hosting available in the country (but at a price). (Yes – we checked. After reading your claims of £600 per month I actually found out the true price. £97 per month. That’s over £500 less than you claimed. Mr Bullshit. £97 isn’t too bad, for a managed service aimed at those who don’t know what they’re doing.) It’s an invisible feature I guess because you guys won’t think about that kind of stuff. I like the security of a 5 minute response time when the site goes down and regular updates rather than waiting hours and hours for a support request to be answered, never mind dealt with, when the site is down.(As long as you put the support request in though Dunk – when you were away on your “jolly” to Barca with your members money, your site was down for a good few hours. Nobody told UKFast it was down. You’ve only got the most basic service they do. £97).

We’ve registered with the Premier League since going members only have and stumped up our licence fees and spent thousands of pounds getting you guys the best match photos without having to lift them for you.(See above – again, try and give the Premier League a call. Tell them Dunk’s licence was obtained by deception. And ask them if Dunk’s actually been paying the agencies for each photo.)

Maybe these things mean little but the point I’m trying to make I guess is that we don’t pocket revenue. (Ah – off we go again)We invest every single penny back into the site.(So how do you pay for food then fatty? You eat a lot of it. And your car? Don’t pretend it’s property, we know it’s not. How do you live? Benefits? You contradict yourself too much.) It would be easy to save on hosting, we could ditch the photos and open up the forums to non members but I like the way things are now. It generally attracts more sensible people.(Like wezo23?)

We’ve also given away loads of match tickets and have made many Reds happy as a result. Maybe we need to fix a comp so you win (You can’t get match tickets you said earlier? Another contradiction. You started to give them away as soon as you realised we were watching. And you do fix the competitions. Don’t you?)

(He’s still not finished…)I see it more of people supporting us if they like what we do rather than buying into something for the sake of it. Because at the end of the day I like to think of it as a family and I think that’s why thousands of members renew every year. But we can’t meet the needs of everyone.(THOUSANDS! I think not. In fact I know not. But “thousands” means at least two thousand, which would be sixty grand in membership fees. Where does it all go? Is it declared? Well for starters I would be surprised if he’d even had 100 new members in the last 12 months. And whatever he does get in doesn’t get declared anywhere. It’s all hidden away in PayPal accounts. (For now).)

At the end of the day we’re just ordinary fans, we’re not a big player, we don’t have the resources of the big boys but we give 110% and if that’s not good enough or if that doesn’t warrant support, there’s not much more we can do 🙂 (Oh dear, dear me. Violin please.)

I’ve just paid for a site upgrade here which should happen soon. I also hope to have some new skins developed for people at work so the forums don’t stand out too much for them and fit in more with their work environment! (Paid for it? I should hope so, because you didn’t pay for it when you used it on your porn site. And you’ve also been looking at changing to the Exponent content management system, which is free open-source software. So don’t be trying to claim you paid for that if you do ever work out how to install it.)

We pay for a chat room, the podcast, the radio service, the SMS alerts (which cost us thousands of pounds every month or so), the match photos, the licences, the best hosting (bnest business host 3 years running I believe), 24/7 moderation, the best prizes… I don’t really know what else I could give. (He’s not mentioned the SMS alerts for a while. Those alerts that people get for a very short time before they all dry up. The ones that keep being reduced all the time. And if you’re now saying you pay for the moderation does that mean that you are all now getting a wage? Contradictions again.)

If people go on holiday they can let us know and we’ll call them at the hotel to let them know what’s happening at LFC or we can text them or fax them. If someone’s stuck on the tube and they need to know what’s happening at Anfield they can text Steve to ask and he’ll text back. If someone can’t get an LFC kit we’ll go to the club shop and buy what they want and send to them wherever they are in the world at cost, no profit…. it’s the small things that cost nothing that are probably welcomed the most. Oh yeh and our transfer deadline day updates are priceless (Has anyone ever had regular personalised updates on holiday? Can you get text messages out from the tube, considering it’s underground? Kits at cost? Do you add petrol money onto those costs for the journey from your Wallsend bunker to the club shop four hours’ drive away? And how about those special shirts you supply – you know the ones that you and Steve write on with black marker and claim Reds players signed them? How come you charge an extra 200 quid for those? Cost only? Bullshit.)

I hope you choose to stay but if you don’t, I wish you well(If he pays, great, if not – get stuffed. As many other members of “the family” found.)

And if you do go, and you don’t need to earn your “I’ve been banned by KopTalk badge” to parade on other sites after acting like a 2-year-old, I’ll even let you have one of my finest steak pies 😉 (That pie joke’s wearing thin as fast as you’re growing fat. And I thought you didn’t ban anyone anyway)

So half an hour in the afternoon, perhaps 15 minutes in the evening, and Dunk made that many mistakes. Dunk drew attention to the fact that there are sites outside the commune. Sites that attack him. And some members will now be using Google to find those sites. And more members will leave as they learn the truth about the Newcastle-season-ticket holder who has spent the last eight years conning Liverpool fans.

Well done Dunk – you market this site better than anyone these days!

Frequently Told Lies

A new gem!

I’ve not been around much of late for various reasons, but I’ve kept a brief eye on things. I’ve glanced at Koptalk from time-to-time and also glanced on here. Thanks for all the kind words I’ve had on here and in the emails I’ve actually managed to read. The offers of pints I hope I can take up one day, although I’d have to buy you one back of course!

I’ve not actually done much reading of my email. I’ve popped my head around the door of the gmail account two or three times this week but with something like 600 unread emails it’s a little daunting!

Thanks to everyone who’s helped to keep the blog going in recent weeks and months, most of all of course Rupert who’s done some excellent work and really kept the heat on.

Today I thought I’d have a little nosy at Koptalk. I went to the main site first, with the intention of clicking one of those misleading “members only” headlines so I could have a good nosy at that too.

But something caught my eye first. Dunk’s added an FAQ! FAQ, for those who didn’t know, stands for “Frequently Asked Questions”. In Dunk’s case you just know each FAQ will be answered with a FTL (Frequently Told Lie).

I had to have a read. I had to see if, for once, he’s told the truth. You never know, maybe he’s finally turned over a new leaf. He’s just been to the USA for a month (How did he pay for that? After all, he is unwaged or so he keeps telling us). Perhaps he saw how bad some of those US religious cults look and realised it was time to stop trying to convert people to his own version of a cult. Then again, maybe he picked up some new techniques from those cults.

So what did he say? Read on…

In the summer of 2006 we cleaned up our member’s community and cancelled the memberships of a small group of people. (First sentence, first untruth! Anyone who was a member of Koptalk on the basis of a previous promise of being allowed a lifetime membership, was kicked out. Pay up or piss off was the basic message.) New members were starting to feel intimidated by a small group of members who had been with the site for several years. (But that wasn’t the problem. If you paid you stayed. Plenty of those left behind were and are capable of intimidation, but the truth is that Dunk only wanted paying members on his site. Those who’d paid various amounts for lifetime membership, or had done various deeds in return for honorary membership were dumped. There was also a distinct possibility that Dunk thought he would get rid of us if he got rid of all his free members. He didn’t manage that – I still have access to the site and I’ve not paid a penny to him for many, many years.) It has always been our policy that a member who has been with the site for years is no more important than a member who joins today.(As long as you pay you are important. Sorry, as long as you pay and don’t ask difficult questions you are important.) We like everyone to be equal with no kind of favouritism. As a result of our decision to clean up our community a campaign was launched against KopTalk by those we ejected.(Another re-invention of history. When this blog started, just over a year ago, Dunk had both a free site and a pay site. It was a good few months after this blog was launched before he started his “clean up”. I suppose he had tried a bit of a clean-up early on, but that was done by banning people at random in an angry way because he couldn’t work out who we were. Time after time he thought he’d worked out who we were, only to find us posting away on here as ever. I started this blog, and was never banned from Koptalk. I started it to have a laugh at Dunk’s made-up-insider-information. He over-reacted and plotted his own downfall. Dunk “cleaned up” his community as a reaction to this blog!) On this page we want to try and answer some of their claims that you may have seen posted around the internet on the websites they set-up to target us. (We’ve set up this web-site, so why “websites” plural? To make it sound worse than it is? This one blog is all there is. For the first couple of weeks of its life the blog was hosted elsewhere, and I’ve experimented with other free hosting services, but this is the only website purely devoted to outing Duncan Oldham, the conman, liar and thief. Other than this site, we’ve been mentioned on just about every UK-based LFC website, INCLUDING THE OFFICIAL SITE! We are linked to from many LFC sites. Very few people disagree with what we are trying to achieve with this blog. We want everyone who is considering using Koptalk to know the truth about it before parting with money. We want everyone who’s already parted with their cash to know what they are helping to support. Most people who know the truth, or at least read this blog with an open mind, leave Koptalk on the spot, or at least make the decision that they’ll leave once they’ve used up their sub. Remember – read it with an open mind. When one of Oldham’s lies is pointed out, no matter how trivial, it’s usually easy enough to see there and then that it’s a lie, or untrue. In this intro to his FAQ he’s told a few lies already. He is incapable of honesty. He has to lie. And when he does, he trips himself up every time).

KOPTALK.COM

Q. Is it true that the owner of KopTalk is a fat Geordie who supports Newcastle?

A. It is true that the owner is fat but he like all of us here are Liverpool through and through. Dunk has supported the Reds since he was a young lad. The first game he attended was the Liverpool Everton FA Cup Final in 1986 when he was 11. He has a Liverbird tattoo on his chunky arm and he was married at the Anfield stadium in 1999. Scouse he is not, he’s a proud Yorkshireman and out-of-towner – maybe some Reds don’t like the fact that he’s an OOT and that he runs a Liverpool website? (Does this answer include any lies? He’s fat, and he’s proud that he’s fat, so that’s not a lie. Liverpool through and through? Well we’ve had it on good authority that he was a Leeds United fan as a child. He turned to Liverpool later. And later still he turned to Newcastle. More on that later. He’s not a Geordie, as many Geordies have been desperate for us to point out. He’s from Scarborough, where he’s well known for his scams, some of which started when he was working part-time in a chippy in the seaside town. And it’s probably because of that notoriety that he had to move to Wallsend near Newcastle, along with his mother who is also notorious in the town. The claim that he attended the FA Cup Final in 1986, at the age of 11, actually messes him up on one of his other lies. To justify himself when questioned in late 2005 about why he wore a S*n hat (as in the boycotted newspaper) in 1998 he claimed he wore it because he didn’t know about the boycott. He knew enough about us in 1986 to be able to get tickets for and go to the FA Cup Final. Three years later and that newspaper printed those lies, and that boycott began. He would have been 14 if what he says above is true. Yet he claimed that in 1998 he didn’t know about the boycott! (Even though we’ve shown proof on here that he knew full-well about the boycott in 1998 – because he spoke about it online). He’s a liar and his lies about The S*n are probably his most despicable ones. He buys the S*n (he admitted as much on his own “free” site last summer, before he closed it down. Tattoo on his arm? The only proof we’ve had of that was on his “Video Podcast” some time ago when he dressed with a tea-towel on his head, hiding himself from the camera before his recent bout of bravery. He flashed, very briefly, what looked like a hand-drawn (with marker pen) drawing of a squashed spider to the camera. But not until he’d started to roll up the wrong sleeve! He was married at Anfield in 1999. And again that event resulted later on in him tripping himself up with another lie. Last summer he claimed his real name wasn’t Duncan Oldham! He said it was a name he made up for the internet! But he’d published his wedding menu from Anfield on his site some years ago, which clearly showed his name as Duncan Oldham, getting married to Maria (Hartley). Dunk’s lies always trip him up. Why would he lie about his real name not being Duncan Oldham? He told his trusting customers that Duncan Oldham wasn’t his real name – why? Then there’s the statement on here: “maybe some Reds don’t like the fact that he’s an OOT and that he runs a Liverpool website”. It’s an attempt by Duncan Oldham to try and convince OOTers that this blog is just here to attack an OOTer. But nobody knows whether I’m an OOTer or not! (Well I do, and those who know me do, but I don’t think I’ve ever said where I’m from on here). I’ve got LFC-supporting friends who are scouse, LFC-supporting friends who are from elsewhere in England, or elsewhere in the world. I’m quite strongly minded that LFC should be a club that welcomes fans from any part of the world, scouse or not, English or not, and I’ve had a couple of arguments on other forums about this in the past (not as “Insider” though). I’m not comfortable with some of the hijacking that’s been done on the RTK campaign by some anti-OOTers, because RTK is not an anti-OOT campaign. And I think that point of view is reflected throughout this blog, because one thing Duncan Oldham likes to take advantage of is that any members who live outside of the UK are hard-pressed to take action against him when they’ve been scammed. Most of his fake merchandise is sold to overseas Reds who just can’t easily take action against him. And an OOTer running an LFC website? Not a problem at all, although those websites run from outside Liverpool that I enjoy using don’t actually try and claim that they are run from Liverpool. Duncan Oldham has lied many times about living in Liverpool, about his site being based in Liverpool. Last summer he claimed he had done a deal to buy a house overlooking Melwood, and was using it free-of-charge until the sale went through. He claimed that he was negotiating with Chris Waddle to buy his house overlooking Melwood! That was a lie, and very odd one too.)

Q. I read he has a Newcastle United ticket season?

A. Dunk has been a Liverpool FC season ticket holder for around 10 years. The only connection he has with Newcastle is that he has family (who moved there) and property investments in that region. When KopTalk HQ moved to the north east Dunk bought a couple of season tickets to Newcastle for his son who would have been around 5 at the time. This enabled someone to take the lad to see some footy. Usually Steve was dragged into doing this or Dunk’s daughter but guess who took Robbie when the Reds were playing there? Dunk posted in one of his editorials about taking his lad to see a few games, it was no secret but those with a grudge like to try and make a big deal about it. Robbie is 7 today and he’s a big Red. He loves his football but now he’s a little older he’s happy to travel to Anfield to see the Reds play. His Newcastle ticket won’t be renewed for the 2007-08 season – thank God! (Dunk does have a season ticket for Anfield. In fact he has two. One’s in his (estranged) wife’s name. He renewed them for this season. They are in the Lower Centenary, I have the full details of which row they are in and which seats they are. Without giving too much away, the seats are a number between 190 and 210. The row number is between 3 and 7. If you sit anywhere near that and want to know Dunk’s actual season ticket numbers let me know by email and I’ll send you the details. Because Dunk doesn’t go to league games at Anfield any more. He obviously sells his tickets, like he sold his FA Cup final tickets last season for £1600. He’s a tout basically, because I doubt very much he has sold his season tickets at face value. I feel like publishing the full details of his seat numbers on here, but that might hurt the person he’s touted the tickets to. Perhaps I will forward the details on during the close season, so the tickets will be invalid for next season. Dunk doesn’t go to the game any more, but he makes a profit on his season tickets. That’s what LFC is to Dunk – a money-making machine and nothing more. His Newcastle season tickets were probably bought for similar reasons. Newcastle often sell out their fixtures, so he can no doubt make a bit of a profit on his tickets from time to time. When Liverpool play there, or at least for the past two seasons, Dunk is there along with his son and his daughter. So has he got THREE season tickets at St James’s? His son, who he’s named above, was pictured on Dunk’s site wearing a Newcastle shirt at the start of this season. Maybe he’s as fickle as his father when it comes to choosing his favourite team if he’s already changed his allegiances. And has his son been to Anfield? It seems doubtful, given that Dunk sells his season ticket and either sells (at tout prices) or gives away (in illegal competitions) any cup tickets he gets for Anfield. No renewal on the season ticket for 2007-08? Last summer Dunk claimed he’d had to lend money off his mam to pay for his season ticket for Anfield (the one he doesn’t actually use). If that’s the case, then he’d have surely had to borrow off her to buy the Newcastle one too. The recent spending spree they’ve had (even though they are unwaged) has surely made sure he can’t afford the Newcastle ticket this time around.)

Q. But doesn’t he run other club football sites?

A. KopTalk started as a hobby and grew into a huge site. During the years Dunk was approached many times by companies keen to tap into that success and help them establish other websites. He refused to sell KopTalk in 2000 and even rejected an offer of £1.3million for a 10% stake at the time. Again Dunk has always been open about his connection to such projects and revealed he had provided advice for other projects but wouldn’t be directly involved as KopTalk was his baby. Today Dunk has advised with the creation of half a dozen successful websites of various sporting themes. Not one of these sites is associated to any other football clubs here in England. Several years ago two club sites catering for Spurs and Newcastle fans were created purely to test the water. They were closed, rebranded and relaunched in 2006 but nobody from KopTalk is involved with such projects including Dunk himself. To clarify, Dunk has no inpurt or ownership of any other football sites other than KopTalk (and the forthcoming kopfootball.com) but only because he doesn’t have the time, interest or effort, not because he should keep anyone else happy. (Do a whois lookup on spursarmy.com, upthetoon.com, chavgames.com, caboodlenetwork.com and the other variations such as .co.uk and so on. You’ll find those sites were all registered by Duncan Oldham either in his own name, in Steve’s name or in his schoolgirl daughter’s name. Koptalk got off the ground thanks to the hard work of Dunk’s co-owner at the beginning. He soon left Koptalk. Dunk kept it going with his lies and scams, his broken promises and betrayals. He never rejected an offer of £1.3million for a 10% stake. He did hand over control of the domain name for a much, much smaller amount at one point, but in return for some easy money he spent all of his time promoting another domain he’d set up, an early version of his “insider” site. The victims that time were “Footy Mad”. In fact if you search around on “Footy Mad” you can see many of Dunk’s lies and made-up or stolen stories. And his begging-for-sympathy stories after he’d had to put one of his greyhounds down for not being fast enough. He was the sole person responsible for the Spurs and the Newcastle sites I’ve just mentioned. He even claimed last summer that Spurs Army was going to get back off the ground soon, but first of all he had arranged for Steve to go down to London to interview some people to work on it! So if he’s done nothing more than advise, what the hell is Steve doing interviewing people to take over the running of those sites? The truth is, Dunk created those sites. Early readers of the blog will remember how Dunk had actually copied the template for his Koptalk.com site to use on his SpursArmy.com site, but had made errors in various places so that parts of the page on the Spurs site loaded in Liverpool red, and he even had a blue Liverbird as one of the logos on Spurs site! The site disappeared when FusionBB were tipped off that he’d used one licence for their software on at least three sites. Is Dunk ashamed that he ran sites for fans of other clubs? Why lies about it? And where is the proof that he’s “advised” on other sporting sites? This bit made me laugh out loud “Dunk has no inpurt or ownership of any other football sites other than KopTalk (and the forthcoming kopfootball.com) but only because he doesn’t have the time, interest or effort, not because he should keep anyone else happy.” Dunk – read that answer again and try and clear up your contradictions. I’m not bothered that you run sites for other clubs, or that you used to do so. That’s your choice. What does bother me was when Michael Owen was about to sign for Newcastle and you pretended to be “Barry” from UpTheToon.com and thanked yourself (Dunk) for being so kind as to share information with yourself. Why not be honest? Why not be straight?)

Q. Someone on another LFC forum said Dunk’s a control freak and everyone has to agree with his views?

A. Was this person a former member who had been given a size ten up his rear-end for abusing others on one of our formers? (Who’s this former member that abused others on one of your formers? What’s a former?) Numerous former members have commented on how things are at Koptalk, how threads are deleted and locked on the whim of the fat controller and his dribbling helpers.) We have a strict moderation policy called the AUP (Acceptable Use Policy). (And how we’ve laughed at that Gestapo-style directive in the past. If you’ve got time find it and laugh, it’s hilarious without meaning to be.) This can be found on our support site at http://www.koptalk. info Basically providing you are polite and non abusive to other members and the moderators you’re fine. (And don’t question, no matter how politely, anything that Dunk does or says. Seriously – do so and you’ll be banned). Alternative debates are fine and nobody on the internet likes to get a few biting about LFC topics than Dunk but it is nonsense to suggest that you can only say a certain thing about the club. (Saying things about the club aren’t the problem. Saying things about Koptalk are the problem). If anything KopTalk urges you to be an individual and support the Reds how you want to, not how others want you to. Our forums are moderated every minute of every day by KopTalk staff and Dunk rarely gets involved in the moderation.(That’s because Dunk spends most of his time pretending to be someone else. So you’ll see a comment, sounding exactly like Dunk, but attributed to Steve, Katie, Emma (who never actually joined herself after her true identity was revealed on here), Jordy (who doesn’t exist) or even Dunk’s daughter. Dunk moderates, but much of the time he’s pretending to be somewhere else because he’s in hiding from one person or other). If you are a mature Red and you don’t go around offending others, you have nothing to worry about.(As long as you enjoy innuendo-riddled conversations with 17-year-old girls like Katrina/Katie on this “mature” forum.) People ban themselves on KopTalk. (Dunk’s catchprase, apart from “Blog That!”) We enjoy banter and we like to see people getting stuck into each other about their different club views. But we expect our members to respect each other. From time to time people clash but they usually kiss and make up. If they don’t and they continue with some kind of vendetta against another member, we bin them, end of. (Anyone else hate the phrase “end of”? It usually comes from people who aren’t able to explain there reasons for doing or saying something. It’s a bit like “because it is”.)

Q. KopTalk doesn’t campaign enough for fan issues?

A. This is a tricky one because behind the scenes we assist many fans with various LFC issues. But we won’t force any of our members or casual visitors to do a certain thing. We believe it’s about the choice of the individual whether they do or don’t do a certain thing. How someone chooses to support the club is not our business. We want our members and casual visitors to enjoy what free time they have online with us and not to get pressurised into doing something just because in the eyes of someone else, they’re not worthy enough unless they do. We will support fan issues if those behind certain campaigns run certain things by us. There are plenty of outlets on the net were people can get involved with various campaigns and we’re happy to point you in the right directions.

(Ha ha! Behind the scenes you assist many fans with various LFC issues? What like? You’re a liar Dunk, you clearly do no such thing. You’ve no contacts at the club, you’ve no clout with any supporters groups (most know who you are and condemn you completely) – what can you do? What about the Michael Shields campaign? Did you ever pay up, in full, the money you claimed you were going to pay? Remember, the amount you kept boasting about. You did it to justify the fact that you took a domain name related to Michael and pointed it to a part of your own site that included those lucrative pop-up ads you’re so fond of. You bought a domain name and created a special section on your forum to point it at, to make money from Michael Shields. Only when you got some stick for it did you PLEDGE some money. Did you pay it all up? As for campaigns, you jumped quite heavily onto the RTK bandwagon. So another contradiction isn’t it? You suddenly support RTK when they produce such a memorable six minutes as they did at the Arsenal FA Cup game. So why publicise that, yet disregard the S*n boycott? In fact your next question covers the S*n boycott.

Q. Is it true that KopTalk supports The Sun newspaper?

A. This is a silly one. That’s how low some rivals have to swoop to try and earn brownie points. To use the innocent lives of 96 Reds to try and target us disgusts us but doesn’t surprise us. As stated above if people want to buy The Sun newspaper then that’s their right. We wouldn’t encourage them to do so for many reasons but we have no right to tell people what they will or won’t do. We’d prefer it if they didn’t buy the rag and we’d encourage them to boycott it but that’s as far as it goes.

(Silly? Despicable more like. Brownie Points? Disgust actually. The S*n is boycotted because they tried to turn the blame for Hillsborough back onto the Liverpool supporters. Worse than that, they made claims that our supports pissed on the dead bodies of those fans who lost their lives. They made claims they we pickpocketed from them. Do some research if you’ve never seen what the S*n wrote. They’ve never apologised, apart from a half-baked attempt after Wayne Rooney had sold his soul to them. The editor at the time, Kelvin MacKenzie admits he knew that they were lies that he allowed to be printed, but he really does not care. What The S*n and Kelvin MacKenzie did played a big part in our 96 lost ones not getting the justice they deserved. That’s why that Arsenal game in January started off with six minutes of singing for justice for the 96, and why the Kop held up a mosaic for those six minutes asking for “The Truth”. Not everyone knows about the boycott of The S*n, and it’s not unusual to see a naive forum member on one LFC forum or other quote from that rag. Usually the poster is told about the boycott (sometimes politely) and the poster apologises. Later on a moderator removes the offending quotes. Nobody questions the boycott. Nobody feels it needs to be debated, perhaps with the exception of a debate over what it would take for the boycott to be lifted. Everyone agrees though – the S*n is boycotted and it will stay boycotted until the families say otherwise.

Except on Koptalk. On Koptalk last summer I saw an exchange where Dunk’s moderators attacked someone who pointed out that quotes from the S*n weren’t welcome. Then Dunk came along and locked the thread, claiming his readers don’t want to be bothered with serious things like that. As the summer went on Dunk’s true feelings about The S*n became more and more apparent. He told more lies about why he wore a hat promoting The S*n at France ’98, even though he’d known about the boycott at the time he was wearing it. And then I spotted a pattern. Some of his news stories linking Liverpool with players from other clubs didn’t appear anywhere else on News Now. Love it or hate it, News Now have long since stopped including stories from The S*n on their LFC page. So how did Dunk get these stories, some of which included quotes from players or managers? Google News helped me to find the answer. Stick a player’s name and part of his quote onto Google News and you’d find the story’s source. The S*n. Google News don’t actually boycott The S*n, so a search on Google News will include their stories in the results. Often there would only be one result with those quotes. Usually if it appeared anywhere else in Google News other than the S*n it was on some newspaper from overseas many hours later. But Dunk had taken the story and used it as his own on Koptalk. And with Google News a relatively new service, most Reds hadn’t a clue that Dunk had got his story from The S*n. Soon Dunk’s story would be number one on News Now – well it was the only story on there linking us to player “X”. Dunk’s now banned from News Now. For the second and hopefully final time. Dunk tried hard to defend himself over this. He was asked questions by his members. One day he claimed that Liverpool players spoke to The S*n. (The BBC are notorious for taking comments given by a player to a press conference and following them with “told the Sun”.) LFC PLAYERS DO NOT TALK TO THE SUN. Dunk tried to make out this wasn’t true. “Rushian”, well known on many Liverpool websites, pointed out to Dunk that he was wrong to say Reds players spoke to the S*n. Dunk again had a go, claiming Rushian was wrong, “and you know it”. The thread was locked. Then Dunk claimed that Peter Crouch had been speaking to the S*n. And what’s more, Dunk said he had the tape to prove it. And, like any true Liverpool supporter would he claimed he was going to use that tape to end Crouch’s career whenever he felt like it! LFC Fan? Sure.

Shortly afterwards Dunk admitted to buying the S*n. In fact he claimed he had it delivered every day, along with some other papers, but he claimed he bribed or threatened the paper boy to give it to him free of charge. Then he filmed him and Steve burning that day’s edition. And then he said he had to buy another copy so that he could type out the story that he’d been so outraged over.

Using the 96 to have a go at Dunk? Days before the anniversary I think his claims are insensitive to say the least, but Dunk took advantage of that boycott to make himself some money. As for supporting the S*n, well he refused to allow any discussion on the matter on his sites and actually seemed to be trying to persuade his members to soften their stance towards the rag. It’s an ideal paper for him, he hates the fact that he can’t talk openly about something he read in there that morning. The other way he supports it is that he copies directly from the BBC their round-up of that morning’s newspaper football stories. He never removes the references to the S*n, claiming outrageously that he CAN’T remove those references (even though it’s a cut and paste job). By removing any threads that inform his members about the boycott and the reasons for it, then printing quotes from the BBC talking about stories in it, he is effectively encouraging his members to satisfy their curiosity by going out and buying a copy of it. If that sells one extra paper for the S*n, then I consider that to be supporting it. Koptalk supports The S*n. )

Q. Fair enough but what about running ads for The Sun newspaper on KopTalk?

A. KopTalk has never taken a single penny from The Sun for advertising. Our advertising is organised and displayed by advertising agencies with the exception of Blue Square and Amazon. Every month the agencies add new campaigns. None of the agencies we use now or we have used in the past notify you of what ads will be run. If an offending ad is displayed, once notified we can disable the particular ad but only once we are aware. With Google Ads you can block/ban certain websites (advertisements) before they appear so obviously we have banned the website of The Sun newspaper. From time to time offending ads can appear, not just from The Sun but also from other advertisers that are maybe not appropriate. Any LFC site signed up to the same advertising agencies would have the same problem. In the entire history of KopTalk we have had to disable adverts for The Sun newspaper twice. The minute we’re made aware of such ads we disable them for obvious reasons. If anyone out there thinks we’d actually knowingly run ads for The Sun they must either be very naive or very, very stupid.

The last time S*n ads appeared on Koptalk, Duncan Oldham played a game of pretending he didn’t know where they were. It’s well documented on here how he played this game, not taking any action until his members had got pretty irate. At the time there were only three possible sources for ads on his site to appear in such a way. Instead of going into the control panel for each one of those three he played his game. He did it to prove a point, to attract attention. As he admits himself above, he hates being told what to do, and he no doubt had a great thrill to see how he’d upset so many Reds. He made no apology for those ads appearing. He instead had a go at those who’d complained. Liverpool fan?)

Q. Loads of Liverpool sites are free, why isn’t KopTalk?

A. Our site was free for years but when Dunk wanted to scale it down to concentrate on his kids, he wanted to concentrate on a more limited readership base. A membership helps deter rival fans and internet trolls. Rather than have the site plastered in adverts, we chose to generate revenue by way of an optional membership fee. Many fans website accepts donations and give little back, we don’t ask for donations, we offer an optional membership to our website with no advertising, free worldwide LFC alerts by SMS and much more. We also ensure that a member of the KopTalk team is online every minute of every day to ensure the forums are kept safe and sensible for our members. All for less than 9p-a-day! And if you disagree with the option of joining, you don’t join. That way everyone’s happy!

(Dunk wanted to concentrate on his kids? He doesn’t see his kids except at weekends and school holidays, and he’s not seen them for a month if he’s actually been in the US for a month. His wife has custody of them. And she wasn’t in the states with him either, despite his tales that she was. He scrapped his free sites because he couldn’t keep on top of the hundreds of outraged Reds that were trying to spread the news about him. Especially when most of his moderators upped sticks and left in disgust. He scrapped his free site. Then he ditched his members on the paysite who’d paid for a lifetime membership. He figured if he restricted his membership to just those who were paying £30 a year he’d get rid of people wanting to spread the word about him. It didn’t work though, there are still many of his members who are fully aware of his scams and have stopped posting, just waiting for the day before their membership runs out so they can make one last, significant post. If Dunk could find a way of bringing back his free sites with the same levels of hits he used to get he would bring them back – as long as nobody could spread the word about him. That’s why his expensive site (£30 a year more than any other “fan” site) doesn’t have a Private Message facility. That’s why you can’t view a fellow member’s profile. He is frightened to death of his members reading this blog with an open mind, away from his control. The fear of a “suicide post” is the reason he has Smoove logging on overnight and Katrina logged on all day. )

Q. Is it true that Dunk has a disabled cousin and ‘scammed’ tens of thousands of pounds from her through fundraising?

A. If you’re a complete loon, yes! Not satisifed with using Hillsborough to try and discredit the site, our former (banned) members and the sites that choose to rival us, try to claim that Dunk would target a family member and profit from her paralysis. Complete nonsense as usual. At first they said she didn’t exist, then she wasn’t really disabled.. if it wasn’t so sad you’d laugh! Then when she came on the site’s podcast to silence these idiots they said she was an actress. Remember, if you ever see such claims, ask them to report them to the police. It’s one thing targeting Dunk and the site but to stoop so low to target a young Red is another thing.

(This one hit Dunk hard. His cousin, Lauren, genuinely is disabled. She’s very unlucky to say the least. I don’t fully remember the start of Dunk’s campaign to raise funds for her, but it all began with the news she’d been hit with the bad news that she was paralysed. Dunk started to raise money from his members to pay money to her parents to pay their mortgage and so on. People were donating big money, sometimes as standing orders. Later on Dunk started a website for Lauren. It consisted mainly of plugs for Koptalk, but included details of how members could donate to her. Cheques were to be made payable to Dunk’s mum, not Lauren’s mum. Dunk used his own PayPal address for online donations “for Lauren”. He sold footballs that were signed – he claimed falsely – by Liverpool players, “for Lauren”, at over £100 a time. He sold numerous fake shirts for at least £200 a time. He sold cup tickets (including FA Cup final tickets at £1600) “for Lauren”. He collected well over a thousand pounds in one day from Paddy Power, including a £300 donation “For Lauren”. In the early days of the appeal some people donated goods rather than money, so Lauren got a laptop for example. But later on it was always money. Dunk made a big fuss on his site about how he wanted to raise money for a special hand-powered bike for Lauren. The balls and the Cup final tickets alone would have paid for that. Except it never appeared. There was never a word from Lauren thanking everyone for the money. And how it must have added up. Except we never saw how it added up. Dunk’s very public appeal was never publicly accounted for. He never mentioned how much was raised and how it was used. If it was all used legitimately it would have been extremely easy for Dunk to show how it had been used. He didn’t though. I’ve not said Lauren doesn’t exist or that she wasn’t disabled – her plight was reported in the press at the time it happened. I’ve not heard the podcast she is supposed to have appeared on. If it was her, did Dunk get her to explain how she’d used the thousands of pounds she’d received from money collected by Dunk between March and May last year? I doubt she did, but I’m prepared to be corrected. And if I’ve time I’ll go back to the police and chase them up on this. I had to stop my communications with them for personal reasons a couple of months back, but perhaps I’ll have time to go back to it soon. Anyone else with time on their hands should contact North Yorks police and ask them to investigate. It’s what Dunk wants! If Lauren got the money off Dunk and spent it all on booze and fags then that’s her choice and I’d not condemn her for it. Targetting Lauren? No, we’re asking Dunk to prove that he handed over that substantial amount of money to his disabled cousin. And it’s not hard to prove it if he did.)

Q. I read that KopTalk sells dodgy goods?

A. We don’t sell anything. We have tried to run a shop in the past but we really didn’t have much success. We could make a lot of money if we wanted to but we simply don’t have the time as we found out. Out of every 1000 orders maybe 2 or 3 items go missing and a further 2 or 3 get damaged in transit. It just wasn’t worth upsetting a member who has been with us say for 4 years because a picture he wanted turned up smashed. It was either a shop or the site. Because of our visits to Melwood we can obtain signed balls, signed shirts etc but if a player’s in a rush a signature on one shirt could be so much different to that when the same player has time to stretch the shirt and sign it when he’s not under pressure and when half a dozen kids are not trying to get a bit of him. Then you’d get one doubter saying this doesn’t match my shirt from last year and so on. Basically we now just keep things for ourselves or our own competitions.

(Dunk had a shop until we started to shop him. All of a sudden his Champions League Balls and Signed Shirts disappeared. Search the blog for the photos of the ball he sent to an Irish member. Look at the signatures, very very poor fakes. He signed them himself, or got Steve to do it. Steve’s name appeared on the certificate of authenticity, at a time when he was 16, maybe just 15. He refused to offer a refund. One member complained repeatedly that he’d not been sent the promised certificate of authenticity. Dunk said he would only send it out if the member first of all sent the ball back at his own expense, from Ireland, so Dunk could check it! He’s a liar and a conman. And he knows he is. What he did in selling those fake balls is classed as fraud, and the poor signatures have nothing to do with a player being under pressure. Dunk won’t admit to this scam of course, but look at those pictures of that ball and you’ll see he’s got no grounds to deny he’s faked those balls. An LFC Fan? Selling fake goods to “fellow Reds”?)

Q. I also read that once a member has signed up, you can debit their card again without their permission?

A. That’s rubbish. At no time do we ever know your credit or debit card number. If you sign up via PayPal your membership runs for one year. At no time during that year could we ever bill you again. It’s impossible and PayPal can confirm this. At renewal time your sub will autorenew if that is set up on your own PayPal account. There’s much more about this on our support site at http://www.koptalk.info

(It’s not rubbish. When Koptalk take your money by Pay Pal they do it using an option which will take an identical amount out one year later. But 11 months later Koptalk will send you reminder that you need to renew your membership, and ask you to pay there and then by Pay Pal. One month later your auto-renewal also goes out. Koptalk know this happens, but don’t tell you. They just pocket the money. If you try and ask for it back you often have to send numerous “support tickets” in before they will pay up. In fact Pay Pal have started to act directly and just pay the subscribers back. They are starting to get wise to Duncan Oldham. Even members who were banned six months earlier find themselves being billed, and Dunk won’t refund their money. Is that the actions of somebody honest? No, it’s the actions of a conman.)

Q. KopTalk has no official sources?

A. That’s right we have no official sources at all but we do have sources throughout the club at various management levels. We have no official relationship with the club and would never want one. We work for our members, the fans, and are not puppets for the likes of Ian Cotton in the press office. KopTalk is rare in that we refuse to toe-the-line on club matters where as some LFC websites will do what they can to have some kind of relationship. We’re not bothered about receiving a club Christmas card, we report the positive and the negative stuff and that will never change. Past and present contributors to the site includes the likes of Barry Venison, Rob Jones, Tommy Smth MBE, Ian St John, Jan Molby, Peter Thompson, Danny Murphy, Steve McManaman and many, many more. We have numerous relationships throughout the club and are in regular contact with players from the past and the present.

(No, the question should be, “Koptalk have no sources at Anfield, Melwood or the Academy?” Careful wording of that question doesn’t excuse you from answering the real question Dunk. You have no offical access to the club, at least you finally admit that. But you don’t have any unofficial access either. You are lying by saying you have “sources throughout the club”. The club hate you, to be frank, because you’re a parasite who reflects badly on our club’s name. In fact it seems you’ve now admitted that your recent visits to the States were far from being at the invitation of our new owners. Surely if they’d invited you they’d be official contacts? So what does that tell us? Lie after lie after lie. You were in Tom Hicks’ office, for a couple of minutes, which in itself is quite an achievement. But it was only for a couple of minutes, not the hour you’ve claimed. And you were warned off. Your hatred of Ian Cotton is unhealthy. As is your hatred of Chris Bascombe. And in that list of “past and present” contributors, how many of those are actually “present” contributors? And why did they all stop contributing? And not all of them ever did contribute did they? Did the ones who left do so because you wouldn’t pay them what you’d promised you would? Or did they realise what they were unwittingly becoming a part of? And Danny Murphy – you used to claim he was your Anfield Mole and your mate. Then when he left Anfield you didn’t even know it had happened! In fact you tried to make out it wasn’t true if I’m not mistaken! Another LFC website broke the news, thanks to their genuine contacts at the club. And your “mate” didn’t even tell you.

Last summer Dunk also claimed to be having a meeting with Rick Parry which he’d have when he could fit Rick Parry in. Dunk claimed he had something Parry wanted! He later admitted he doesn’t actually meet Rick Parry on a regular basis and in fact had never actually met him. He also went quiet on his previous claims that he was mates with Steven Gerrard!)

Q. Dunk’s writing a book called ‘Anfield Exposed’ but it’s never appeared why is that?

A. Simple. Just a lack of time. Several years ago Dunk announced his intention to write a book about the site. Interested people could place a pre-order deposit of £5 if they wanted to grab a copy when published. The working title was ‘Anfield Exposed’ but a more appropriate name would be given at publication. It’s not about exposing LFC in anyway and there isn’t any kind of negativity towards the club. Why would one of the biggest Reds in the world attack the club he loves? A publication date was never set and it was hoped to be published this season but again, time has been an issue. Also because of the campaign against the site since last year, there are fears that the book could be too revealing about key matters at Anfield. Not only that but since last summer various members of Dunk’s family have been targeted in a not so nice way. People with no connection to the site have been targeted at work simpy because they are related to Dunk. All of this just because one or two saddos cannot accept the fact that KopTalk is a success. The fact that Dunks own kids and family members have been targeted is a concern and whether or not we’ll go ahead with the book we’ll have to wait and see. Anyone who has placed a pre-order deposit several years back can at any time request a refund in full. It’d be a shame not to share this book with so many people but family has to come first.

(So once again, a month from his latest deadline, Dunk finds an excuse not to publish the book that he claimed was already finished last year. He changes this story all the time, even blaming an exploding laptop one time for the delay. The book was due out for the start of this season, then for the end of last year, then for the end of this season. And they are just the moving dates for his book since this blog started. He says “there isn’t any kind of negativity towards the club”! Well have a look back in time to his website promoting his book: The archive of anfieldexposed.con shows him promising all those about to part with the £5 deposit for a book that doesn’t exist that they’ll be able to read about, “The VIP apology from Anfield when a certain individual was trapped by the editor following a planned attack on the site” or “The CCTV footage of one of Anfield’s biggest stars that is locked away in a vault in the city. The media know it exists and offers of £50,000 have so far been rejected!” Not negative towards the club? An LFC fan? And again those claims about his family and kids being “targetted”! Meanwhile over on his cyber-squatted kopfootball domain he pretends his teenage schoolgirl daughter is the figurehead for his awful-looking site on the new stadium! It’s time someone warned the child protection people about Mr Oldham and the way he exploits his kids.)

FINAL WORD

Every day of the week new Reds join our website. We consider them to be members of our family and we will do all we can to make them happy. You can’t keep everyone happy but we try to if they come to us. We will do everything possible to make someone happy. We listen and we care and that’s why every year thousands of our members renew.

(Every day? Not what I’ve heard, far from it. You listen? Well listen to this – answer us some questions with honesty for once. Own up, if you’ve got the guts to.)

The internet is a scary place and for some reason some people want to rival us. We’re no angels but in all the years the site has been online we’ve never had any major problems.

(Dunk is quite obsessed with this “rival” idea. Look at any LFC website and you’ll see complimentary words about other LFC websites. You won’t see a complimentary word about Koptalk though, quite the opposite. And you can’t mention other LFC websites on Koptalk. Dunk is frightened you’ll jump ship. He sees the other sites as rivals, yet all the other sites see each other as part of one big net community.)

Anyone that takes a pop is usually connected to another LFC website or they’ve been booted off either our former free forums or our existing members only forums. Sometimes it’s simply just a Red who has no connection to us but wants to be loyal to the particular site they use. (No Dunk, most people who’ve been banned by you have been banned for mentioning this blog. Nobody gets banned for any other reason other than mentioning this blog or the concerns of this blog. People who take a pop take one because they’ve been double-charged by you and couldn’t get a refund, or got banned for asking where their book was. People who have a pop at you know about you and they speak the truth. Face up to it, the vast majority of Reds who’ve heard of you hate you for what you’ve done to our club and our fans. Your mam must be proud of you.)

At the end of the day there’s a lot of childish nonsense around the web. We’re happy that thousands of members enjoy our site and come back year after year.
(Thousands? You’ve only got “hundreds” left now, and most of those are lurking until their memberships run out. The game’s all but over, no matter how hard you try.)

Our site is aimed at mature Reds, we try to be different than the others. We don’t care if you’re from Liverpool or Libya or whether you attend every game that involves the Reds or whether you’ve never been able to get to Anfield. If you’ve got Red in your heart that’s all that matters. (No – all that matters is that they have to be in possession of a credit or debit card and have to be willing to take all your lies as truth. If either of those isn’t there you don’t want them.)

If you can’t make your own mind up in life and are thinking of not joining because you’ve seen a site taking a pop at us, we kind of understand, but maybe you’re not the sort of member we’re looking for. We don’t want people who aren’t intelligent enough to differentiate between a genuine moan and a direct attempt to discredit our site simply because of our success and because we don’t have time for fools.
(Good move Dunk. “If you are so thick that you believe a site run on a completely voluntary basis over a site that makes enough money for its unwaged owner that he can travel around the states in a party of four for four weeks then you aren’t welcome! No we didn’t steal money from Lauren, but we’re spending a hell of a lot on this holiday, and this gadget-filled van (did that ever materialise?) even though we’ve not got only a couple of hundred members. Obviously it’s still a lot of money you can make from even a few members, but £30 each time 300 is only nine grand. And you claim your web hosting costs 1200 quid a month. And you claim you’ve got permission to use all of those photographs on your site from the Premier League, even though you’d have to get permission from Anfield as well as the Premier League and then you’d have to pay a huge sum for the licence. And quite a large sum for each photograph too. Your little attempt at psychology is only going to attract fools isn’t it? Which is what you need, because without fools you’ll struggle to keep your myths alive.)

We have members from all races, backgrounds and ages. Sign-up and if you don’t like our website, why not email the man himself via dunk2007koptalk.com and tell him.
(Email him then. Ask him some questions. See if he’ll reply. Because from what I can gather, he won’t reply to anyone who asks even a slightly difficult question. All you get is an auto-responder where he claims other people filter his emails before he sees them! As if he’d trust Katrina to read his mail first, especially if most of it contains stuff that might make her finally see that Dunk did rip her mate Lauren off after all.

Keep an eye on our existing member feedback, they’re the only people you should pay any attention to. Don’t listen to us, our rejects or our rivals, listen to what our existing members think.
(How many of those “existing members” a) are still existing and b) exist? )
KopTalk doesn’t rival anyone, they just want to rival us and we know why…
(Dunk, again, shows his obsession with the word “rival”. He’s not afraid of the competition at all is he? And one last point on this update that I admit is probably too long: This blog is not making money. This blog is not an LFC website. This blog is here purely to educate LFC fans and others about Duncan Oldham and his many scams. As soon as Dunk goes then so will this blog. As soon as Dunk finds another club or another sport to scam, the blog will be locked. As soon as Dunk gets what he deserves after his years of bullying, the blog will no longer be needed. )

Keep reading, keep spreading the word, keep on Dunk’s back. There can’t be too many left now that don’t know the truth about him.

Fake Red shows Reds ignorance, hints at Leeds love

Compared to the idiocy of a so-called Liverpool site (Koptalk) taking money – knowingly – from adverts for The S*n, this post will probably come across as quite trivial. It’s just a few snippets of recent days at Koptalk that I’ve been gathering.

Starting off we’ve got one of those brilliant unintended comedy moments that Duncan Oldham provides us with. Earlier this week someone who works for the Mirror mistakenly reported that Liverpool ‘keeper Jose Reina had only months left to run on his contract. Clearly a huge mistake from a journalist who’d heard half a story and tried to guess how to fill in the gaps. Liverpool’s reserve ‘keeper Jerzy Dudek is out of contract at the end of the season, and this is where the confusion came from.

The reason that we had some comedy on the back of this journalist’s error is because Duncan Oldham doesn’t know as much as he’d like to claim about LFC. Rather than admit he doesn’t know, he’s got to disguise this. But it was killing him not knowing if Reina was about to be let go. So, he dusted off one of his aliases, “NJRED”. This particular alias was the one Oldham used when posting links to football streams or clips of goals. It was the alias he used in his pathetic and funny attempts at pretending that he wasn’t actively posting the links to those breaches of copyright. We saw right through it, and after a brief time using the alias “Mohan” to post links to the streams he started using his own name. He’s not got any links on to today’s match by the way.

So here, pretending to be “NJRED”, is Dunk asking his members to tell him what they pay him to tell them…


NJRED
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jul 22 2006
Posts: 23

Reina’s contract?
#1694866 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:16 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

When is he contracted to because in the papers today it says he can leave on a free at the end of the season!!! Surely that cannot be right???
– – – – – – – – – – – –
tomasjj
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 17 2005
Posts: 7069
Loc: Oslo, Norway

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: NJRED]
#1694876 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:27 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

zzzzzzoundzzzzzz like bolloxzzzz
– – – – – – – – – – – –
Mabs_Miah
Gold Member
Reged: Aug 10 2006
Posts: 15
Loc: london

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: tomasjj]
#1694885 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:34 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

sounds like rubbish to me, especially as we paid £6m for him last year!
Think carson would give Reina a good run for his if he is recalled in January.

– – – – – – – – – – – –
tomasjj
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 17 2005
Posts: 7069
Loc: Oslo, Norway

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: Mabs_Miah]
#1694888 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:37 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

They are probs talking about Dudek.

——————–
It’s Rafa….

– – – – – – – – – – – –
Desertscouser
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Sep 19 2006
Posts: 9779

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: NJRED]
#1694896 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:48 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Appalling article by a female journalist who clearly knows nothing. There is absolutely no way in hell that Reina was signed for all that cash and then given a 2 year contract. Ridiculous.

– – – – – – – – – – – –
gpo1971
Gold Member
**
Reged: Mar 16 2006
Posts: 379
Loc: Widnes

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: NJRED]
#1694900 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:50 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Think he’s on a 4 year contract and he’s only done a year and a bit. He did say at the time that he intended to stay for 3 or 4 years tops. Whether that still holds up or not, dunno.

– – – – – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12255
Loc: UK

Re: Reina’s contract? [Re: gpo1971]
#1694903 – Thu Nov 09 2006 11:52 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

RAFA’S GAME OF LUDO
By Ann Gripper, The Mirror

RAFA Benitez is looking to his old club Valencia for a goalkeeper to replace Jose Reina – which should be good news for Charlton boss Iain Dowie.

Scott Carson, on loan from Anfield to The Valley, has been in stunning form recently, and the Addicks’ hopes would be dealt a serious blow if he was recalled to Liverpool.

But with the Reds’ first-choice keeper Reina out of contract in June, Benitez is targeting Valencia’s French 23-year-old reserve goalkeeper Ludovic Butelle, who he brought to Spain from Metz two years ago.

Never mind Dunk – some of your members don’t see through you. Not many, but some.
I wonder if Steve’s started to see through you yet? Why are you still using his login id? Like here, with what I am guessing is an attempt at pretending that you’ve had a call off some contact or other at Melwood…


ST3Administrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Sep 12 2003
Posts: 8267
Loc: UK

Rafa this morning
#1695015 – Thu Nov 09 2006 01:29 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Rafa was as happy as normal when he arrived at Melwood today. He said he had no intention of leaving Liverpool.

Not conclusive i know but i thought you might like to know.

Of course that was Thursday, before Rafa explained how Chinese whispers had resulted in his agent being misquoted about Rafa’s future plans. Minor details like that don’t bother the likes of Oldham. The closest Oldham got to seeing Rafa arrive at Melwood was probably by watching Sky Sports News.

Still logged on as “ST3”, Oldham carried on with more desperate attempts to spark some debate and get some hits. All this makes him look so sad, but he’s desperately trying to get his site back…


ST3Administrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Sep 12 2003
Posts: 8267
Loc: UK

If Liverpool FC hadn’t been born
#1695132 – Thu Nov 09 2006 03:28 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

If Liverpool FC hadn’t been born who do you think you would have supported and how would it have effected your life?

Local Reds would probably have been Blues but people from further away would have been brought up focusing on other clubs because of friends and stuff. I wonder what would have happened to you?

See what I mean by desperate? How about asking why a sad overweight waster from Scarborough dumped his love of Leeds to become a fake Red? Would it also be worth asking why he then added Spurs and Newcastle to his list of teams he supported? An open debate on that issue would get some hits.

Open debate though, as we’ve often pointed out, is not welcome on Koptalk. The few remaining members who still don’t know how they’ve been deceived by Oldham since shelling out that thirty quid are all that Dunk has left to hang on to. He’s frightened to death of them being given a chance to read this blog with an open mind. He worries a lot about what might happen should these members find out about other sites like www.est1892.co.uk or www.sixcrazyminutes.com, the latest sites to be formed by Liverpool fans wanting to talk about their club without being ripped off by the conman. In recent weeks a few people have been posting their email addresses on Koptalk, and others have found ways of circumventing Oldham’s attempts to prevent them from displaying their email addresses in their profiles. This sends a shiver down Oldham’s spine. Or it would if he had one. Time for a warning…


KOPTALK.COMAdministrator
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 25573

Do not post your email address in this forum
#1693476 – Wed Nov 08 2006 09:42 AM
Reply to this post Reply

If you post your email address in this forum you will be spammed by our rivals who lurk here. If you need to contact another member simply call Steve on 07962 475020 and explain why. He will then make contact with that member to put you both in touch.
——————–

Rivals? He still claims we are rivals! This blog is not here to make money out of Liverpool fans – we send traffic to other LFC sites as and when the opportunity arises, and although I may have my own preferences I don’t favour one site over another on here. Why should people who pay £30 each to join a so-called great “community” have to phone a teenager to be given permission to swap email addresses? For one reason – because Oldham is shit-scared that he’ll lose yet more members if he gives out their addresses. And the daft thing is, people have already got hold of email addresses to use to warn others about Koptalk by this method! It’s stopping nothing. And if you want to try it, there’s now a free number to get through to Dunk’s half-brother – 0800 5300 192.

Even this weekend Dunk’s scraping the barrel desperately trying to get some kind of activity on his site. How bad is this post?


DunkAdministrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12356
Loc: UK

How deep are you?
#1696783 – Sat Nov 11 2006 09:02 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

How deep of a person are you? The question might even only be understood by ‘deep’ people. What say you?
——————–

So Dunk now thinks he’s ‘deep’. My word Oldham, you do push things a little far in what you expect people to fall for. The only time we expect to see the word “deep” alongside your name is when we are discussing your preferences for how you like your Mars Bars fried. Oh and if we are talking about you being in deep shit of course.

Next he’s still promising us that new-look site. Maybe we’ll see it before Christmas. It’s a race – what comes first? The book or the new-look site? Will either of those actually happen?


KOPTALK.COM
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 25598

SITE NEWS
#1695357 – Thu Nov 09 2006 07:53 PM
Reply to this post Reply

We are currently building and testing our new website. Basically this is an upgrade of the existing site as you see it now. There will be minor changes in appearance once the work is complete but there will be more content that you should find useful.

We are applying pressure on the people who are doing the work to have it completed as quickly as possible.

Hopefully there won’t be much disruption. You should not need to re-register or change any of your log-in details when the upgrade is performed.

We will update you when we are ready to perform the upgrade. Hopefully it will be before this month is out.

Please monitor the site news forum on this site for regular updates. Click on MAIN INDEX above and scroll to the bottom of the site to locate that section.

Thanks for your continued support

Finally, Dunk’s been keeping an eye on goings on at Manchester United and Leeds. One club is what he pretended to have called himself for charity for a while (even though he never once showed anyone the actual paperwork confirming the change of name). The other is his first team supported. There’s also a mention of Cardiff, the city where he claims to have bumped into loads of Koptalkers in August, despite failing to show us a single photo of one, or to have even a short conversation on Koptalk with any Koptalkers about how they met up…


DunkAdministrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12356
Loc: UK

Man U’s Smith talking to Cardiff
#1695755 – Fri Nov 10 2006 12:19 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

I think a loan move there for him would help his return. They’re a huge club and the fans would love him.

Leeds should go in for him

——————–

Perhaps Leeds would be a good home for Duncan Oldham too. Thanks to recent visits here by Newcastle fans there’s no chance of Oldham getting away with a Newcastle United site, he’ll not fare much better in resurrecting his Spurs site and he never got round to starting his Nottingham Forest site. It’s a shame that Leeds fans would have to endure Oldham after surviving Peter Risdale and having Ken Bates on their case now, but as long as he’s leaving Liverpool alone, most of us would be happy. Maybe another team who wear all-white would be better for him – if you recall one of his many fantasies in the summer, he’s been learning Spanish since Rafa joined Liverpool FC!

More of the same from the blog!

Emblazoned on the front of the Koptalk.coN website webpage, was the claim that you could watch the Carling Cup game online – just hand over that £30 (£20 cash if nobody’s looking) and get Inside. Inside was this –

Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11807
Loc: UK

Re: Reading Carling Cup Game [Re: irishredrover]
#1682307 – Wed Oct 25 2006 06:37 PM

Monitor this page in the run up to the match:

http://www.myp2p.eu/Matches/Match1.htm

——————–

And guess what? It wasn’t on there. I believe some people got to see the game on streams elsewhere, but not Koptalk members.  Well, not unless they paid somewhere else as well as paying that £30 to Koptalk. Another example of how Koptalk doesn’t do what it says on the tin.

Dunk’s renowned on here for talking to himself, and he seemed to get extremely confused with it all on Wednesday night. “Macers” from Belfast posted this –

Macers
Gold Member
***
Reged: Oct 26 2004
Posts: 535
Loc: Belfast
Re: Liverpool v Reading – CONFIRMED TEAM & MATCH THREAD [Re: jmp7300]
#1682570 – Wed Oct 25 2006 09:09 PM

Fowler playing lifts the crowd who in turn lift the rest of the team. It was like that last year when we were all 110% PC scoring, the atmosphere at those matches was great. One feeds the other thats what we need to get a good roll going, it breeds confidence in both camps.

——————–

Then….

DunkAdministrator
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11878
Loc: UK

Re: Liverpool v Reading – CONFIRMED TEAM & MATCH THREAD [Re: Macers]
#1682573 – Wed Oct 25 2006 09:10 PM

Quote:
Fowler playing lifts the crowd who in turn lift the rest of the team. It was like that last year when we were all 110% PC scoring, the atmosphere at those matches was great. One feeds the other thats what we need to get a good roll going, it breeds confidence in both camps.

This is a good point.

With regards Fowler tonight, he hasn’t looked lightning, fair comment Dunk, but he has looked above what we have seen in recent weeks. I don’t know how to explain it, he just looks ‘Liverpool FC’.
——————–

What is he on? Dunk that is, not Fowler. It must really wind him up though, watching Fowler playing for us. Regular readers know that Dunk tried to spread some dirt – false dirt too – about Fowler during the Houllier reign. He claimed Fowler was too pissed or hungover to train when in fact Fowler was pretty ill. He’d spread stories about Fowler being out on the ale all night when the reality was Fowler had been out for an hour or so for a couple of drinks. He wanted Fowler out, and he tried his best. When Fowler left he had a headline on his “editorial” with a headline along the lines of “Close the door on your way out”, delighted that he’d seen the back of a player he’d tried so hard to hurt.

Oldham’s an evil piece of work. He’d be an evil genius if he wasn’t as thick as he is. Instead of being the evil genius he’d love to be he’s just nasty thicko. He tries to be funny sometimes, and it really doesn’t work. He’s only funny when he’s not trying. Here’s him trying…

Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11807
Loc: UK
Just had a Muslim lady knock at my front door
#1681501 – Tue Oct 24 2006 11:06 PM

I refused to open it and only spoke through the letterbox to see how she liked it

(Dunk had a long pause here, possibly for effect.)

Lighten up

——————– 

That post was probably for our benefit anyway – much of what he posts these days is. It was repeated on here earlier in the week that Oldham had complained in the summer about the lack of English people on his trip to London, and he had other hints later on about how he’s not keen on “foreigners”.

A few posts later, he claims to have friend. As if!

Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11807
Loc: UK

Re: Just had a Muslim lady knock at my front door [Re: Dunk]
#1681528 – Tue Oct 24 2006 11:28 PM

A mate of mine is from Doncaster. He said one of the funniest things he ever saw was outside a Mosque.

Apparently while everyone was worshipping inside the dustbinmen came along and removed every single pair of shoes from the footpath and outside the Mosque and put them in the back of the wagon.

He swears it’s a true story.

(Had this been a Christian related story, I’d have also posted it)

——————–

Why the need for the last bit? Feeling guilty? Or just playing to this audience?

Then he revealed what he’s doing with the remants of that PayPal money he got from pretending to be collecting for his disabled cousin…

Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11807
Loc: UK

Who plays poker?
#1681523 – Tue Oct 24 2006 11:22 PM

I’ve been playing a few days now. I can’t believe I didn’t start earlier.

Anyone play for real money? I must admit I’ve tried the free stuff on XBOX LIVE with Smoove (took a couple of hundred $k off him tonight!) but I tried real money the other day on one of the UK bookies and did quite well on that also.

Very addictive at first but after an hour or so I get a bit bored!

——————–

That’s his only friend – Smooch his video-game partner.

He’s already asked, a long time ago, for information on Muslims. This was on the newsgroups pre-Koptalk.  Now he’s asking daft questions on his forums to see if he can drum up some interest –

Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 11807
Loc: UK

Ban Religion
#1681529 – Tue Oct 24 2006 11:29 PM
Reply to this post Reply     Reply to this post Quote

If we banned religion and got rid of all faiths… what kind of an impact on the world would this have?

——————–

Sorry for the short update today.

We’ve had the point raised again in comments that the blog seems to be consisting these days of articles that would never have appeared in here at the height of summer when Dunk was losing it on a grand scale. Comments saying that we’re posting here just for the sake of posting. Also that we’re repeating ourselves.

In some ways we are posting for the sake of it – Oldham is not doing much at the moment. I’ve always just posted whatever I find on Koptalk, and different people like different things. I think it’s important we post something every couple of days just so you know we’re still around. I’ve still got that offer open to all readers that you are more than welcome to write something yourself too. You might have a different viewpoint from us and I think people would like to hear it.

I thought his talking to himself was funny so that’s why that went in above. It’s not something of any great importance, but nothing really is in this particular post. Koptalk is barely ticking over. His racist joke and questions about religion were really just odd and so I thought they might be of interest to some of you. One other thing we try to do here is give you what he charges you for free of charge. He steals, we steal it back for you. That’s why the feed info went in at the front. I’m just wary of posting those feeds in advance, but I can assure you, that’s the only site he refers to now. And “Mohan” has mysteriously disappeared – Dunk just posts that link himself now.

As for repeating ourselves, my mention of what Dunk tried to do to Fowler has been mentioned on a lot of occasions, but I think it’s worth mentioning it from time to time, along with some of the other stuff he’s done. If you’re new to the blog you probably didn’t know what Oldham had tried to do to Fowler. And you probably don’t know that he’s had less concerted efforts to hurt Bellamy and Crouch too. If you are new, have a search around the blog and see what you can find. Use the links at the top too. You might then work out why Michael Barrymore’s at the top too, along with those shirts that certainly aren’t Liverpool ones. And while you’re at it, have a search on here for Chris Waddle and the Koptalk Hotel.

One other criticism is that we’ve “had a go” at Koptalk members. I just want to briefly say why, although I’ve said it in the comments a few times too. Koptalk should either close down or clean up. It won’t clean up, it’s had plenty of chances. It won’t pay back the money it stole from Liverpool fans thinking they were helping Dunk’s cousin. It won’t pay back all the money it stole from members who left when they realised they’d been ripped off. It still won’t stop using and supporting The S*n. If Koptalk was a Liverpool board member it would be the treacherous bastard of a board member that went to the Mirror today! Except Koptalk would have gone to the S*n for more money. It’s claimed in the past to have moles inside Anfield, when in fact it’s just a cancerous mole trying to stay attached to our club. We’re trying to fight it, trying to get rid of it.

We’ve nearly done it, but not quite. And if everyone who knows the truth about Koptalk stops posting on there tomorrow we’ll be one step closer to doing it. If everyone stops visiting at all we’ll be one step closer. We need those who know to stop posting. We also need those who don’t know to find out all about the truth about Koptalk. Drawing attention to users might do the trick (it has before).

I still want to know something. Why would anyone who knows the full truth about Koptalk and considers themselves to be a Liverpool supporter continue to post on there? Please stop posting on there. If you’ve got a good reason to carry on then please let me know – otherwise, please stop. Now!

Is it worth thirty quid yet?

Last night when I logged onto the plummeting site for members only, the newly-named Koptalk Members, I noticed that it had just 76 people logged on in total. SEVENTY SIX! This was at what should be a fairly busy time – I know a lot of people log on during the daytime, and again a lot of people log on during the evening time. Either of those times should be busy. At the time I was logged on me and the other 75 visitors were missing the footy on the box.

Funnily enough there were just two games on the box in the UK at the time. Both of these were featuring Dunk’s “other” teams. His favourite London side Tottenham, subject of his now disappeared spursarmy.coN site – http://whois.domaintools.com/spursarmy.com – and of course his local team, the team he’s got a season ticket for, his current faves, those barcode-wearing Geordies, who used to be subject of another of his discarded websites, upthetoon.coN – http://whois.domaintools.com/upthetoon.com.

After someone (koptalksucks.com) reported his last lot of video clips to the site owners, he’s now taken to putting his illegal videos onto YouTube. See http://youtube.com/watch?v=9EkHTG2FEO4
for the Galatasary goals. He sells his thirty quid memberships to people so that they can see these illegal clips – but he hasn’t even got the sense to restrict them to his members only. Watch the clips for free for as long as he tries to get away with it by visiting us here. See also http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/143949/steven_gerrards_beauties.swf, http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/191821/djibril_cisse.swf and http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/142878/riise_goals.swf – clips of SG, Djibs and JAR, this time using the metacafe site to host them rather than get shut down by his own ISP.

As well as letting you see for free anything Dunk steals for sale on his site, one of the aims of this blog is to let you see just what you get for your money. If you aren’t sure whether to pay for Koptalk or not, look at this piece of so-called insider information…

KOPTALK.COM Administrator
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 24819

SCOUTING REPORT: Player assignment
#1656945 – Wed Sep 27 2006 10:39 AM
Reply to this post Reply

SCOUTING ASSIGNMENT

Date:

Wednesday 27th September 2006

Fixture:

Werder Bremen v Barcelona

Competition:

Champions League

Venue:

Weserstadion (Germany)

Assignment Type:

Player

Player Details:

Diego Ribas (Bremen). Attacking midfielder/forward. D.O.B. 28-02-85. Brazilian with 2nd nationality (Italian). Has EU passport. Signs for Bremen in May 2006 for 6m Euro from Porto. Previously with Santos.

Speculation or Confirmed?:

Assignment details (fixture & venue) confirmed. Player identity confirmed.

Liverpool FC official or agent(s):

Club’s own scout(s).

Previously Scouted:

12-09-06: UEFA Champions League Group A match (Stamford Bridge) Chelsea v Bremen.

So what did you make of that? Something that anybody could make up? Of course it is, and a typical piece of bullshit from Oldham. The only scouts he knows are the ones that meet up at his local church hall every Thursday, and the less said about Oldham and such things the better.

I thought this was a funny little thread too. Seems to be rather heavy with sarcasm, but these people could actually like Oldham for real…


DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10794
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: shiney]
#1657325 – Wed Sep 27 2006 06:12 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
Ok Ok… now I don’t want to sound all gushy or anything but I can’t help but notice that since Ste took over as Ed that Dunk has been around on the forums more often.

As a result I’ve found that the quality of threads has dramatically improved over the last few weeks. To the extent that I (a lurker by nature) actually felt the need to write this post.

Just thought I’d voice my appreciation. I also like the revamp that I assume Steve has made to the site.

I’m off now to scrape this brown stuff off my tongue and find a breath mint.

3-0 tonight. Crouch will score.

This has got to be a wind up right? Everyone hates me

Since we’ve been making the changes we can concentrate more on our members which is only right. We’re not finished yet, we need to upgrade the software and make things easier to navigate for you.

The best thing I’ve ever done is scale down the free site because it was leaving me/us with little time. This has enabled us to get to Melwood more often and do other things.

Steve’s got a lot to learn yet but he’s a good lad.

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
shiney
Gold Member
***
Reged: Dec 10 2004
Posts: 132
Loc: Hampshire

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: Dunk]
#1657333 – Wed Sep 27 2006 06:26 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:

Quote:
Ok Ok… now I don’t want to sound all gushy or anything but I can’t help but notice that since Ste took over as Ed that Dunk has been around on the forums more often.

As a result I’ve found that the quality of threads has dramatically improved over the last few weeks. To the extent that I (a lurker by nature) actually felt the need to write this post.

Just thought I’d voice my appreciation. I also like the revamp that I assume Steve has made to the site.

I’m off now to scrape this brown stuff off my tongue and find a breath mint.

3-0 tonight. Crouch will score.

This has got to be a wind up right? Everyone hates me

Since we’ve been making the changes we can concentrate more on our members which is only right. We’re not finished yet, we need to upgrade the software and make things easier to navigate for you.

The best thing I’ve ever done is scale down the free site because it was leaving me/us with little time. This has enabled us to get to Melwood more often and do other things.

Steve’s got a lot to learn yet but he’s a good lad.

Hate is a strong word.

‘Tolerate’ is more accurate.

——————–
The secret is that Liverpool is as strong as a pine cone – Xabi Alonso

New English Premier League Champions Liverpool FC 2006 – 2007

– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10794
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: shiney]
#1657334 – Wed Sep 27 2006 06:28 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
thesilverfoxlfc
Gold Member
**
Reged: Nov 18 2005
Posts: 1757
Loc: Ireland

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: Dunk]
#1657447 – Wed Sep 27 2006 08:26 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:

This has got to be a wind up right? Everyone hates me

Since we’ve been making the changes we can concentrate more on our members which is only right. We’re not finished yet, we need to upgrade the software and make things easier to navigate for you.

The best thing I’ve ever done is scale down the free site because it was leaving me/us with little time. This has enabled us to get to Melwood more often and do other things.

Steve’s got a lot to learn yet but he’s a good lad.

Will you be getting interviews with the players now that your good friends with Parry now that would be impressive….surely you should of got that perk in when you met him big man??

——————–
……….The Bellers fan club 00001…………..

…The Bellamy Sports and Social club Chairman….

“You get the chance to play for Liverpool and it’s a lifelong dream come true.”

– – – – – – – – –
redohagan1
Gold Member
*****
Reged: Aug 17 2006
Posts: 8

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: thesilverfoxlfc]
#1657691 – Wed Sep 27 2006 10:45 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

just to add to the brown arsing – steve is first rate at sorting things out there and then. Thanks

– – – – – – – – –
jon cymraeg
Gold Member
****
Reged: Jan 30 2003
Posts: 49
Loc: Wales

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: redohagan1]
#1657773 – Wed Sep 27 2006 11:37 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

I’ll second that, Steve your a star mate. Sorted me out with the upgrade in no time. Top man.

– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10794
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Dunk – Sorry Steve – appreciation thread… [Re: jon cymraeg]
#1657817 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:22 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

We still need to improve. I get very unhappy when I hear someone has been kept waiting which is why I always tell people to bell his mobile and threaten him


Like a politician (Cyril Smith?) – only answer the questions you want to answer. What about some interviews via your mate Rick Parry? What’s that? You’ve never met Rick Parry? He doesn’t have something you want? You’ve not got something he wants?

Something you have got though is a rapidly shrinking pile of thirty quids that you’ve conned out of people over the years. Along with your other large wads of cash from ticket touting and selling fake so-called “signed” items. Now that you know we’re watching you it’s impossible for you to pull these cons. Some people think you’ll be doing a runner sooner or later with the cash you’ve collected over those years, and it’s been commented on here on this blog by some. Which is probably why you posted this…


DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10797
Loc: KOPTALK

Cheap flights
#1658506 – Thu Sep 28 2006 05:25 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Do you have any experience of any cheap hotel flights websites please?

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
liverpool69
Gold Member
***
Reged: Apr 08 2003
Posts: 559
Loc: in a vat of stella

Re: Cheap flights [Re: Dunk]
#1658508 – Thu Sep 28 2006 05:26 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Going anywhere nice

——————–
so much better than last week!

– – – – – – – – –
Gazami69
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jan 05 2005
Posts: 489
Loc: Primrose Hill

Re: Cheap flights [Re: Dunk]
#1658509 – Thu Sep 28 2006 05:27 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

http://www.sidestep.com

– – – – – – – – –
richt71Moderator
Moderator
***
Reged: Jul 09 2003
Posts: 12291
Loc: York

Re: Cheap flights [Re: Dunk]
#1658510 – Thu Sep 28 2006 05:27 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
Do you have any experience of any cheap hotel flights websites please?

http://www.skyscanner.co.uk is good Dunk. It basically searches all across Europe’s flight websites and collates the cheapest on offer for you by date, price or both.

——————–
It’s official Icequeen is fit…..so say her stalkers!

– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10797
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Cheap flights [Re: liverpool69]
#1658514 – Thu Sep 28 2006 05:39 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
Going anywhere nice

I’m doing a runner

Thanks for the links. Will check them out

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
KatieAdministrator
KopTalk Support
***
Reged: Jul 11 2006
Posts: 295

Re: Cheap flights [Re: Dunk]
#1658621 – Thu Sep 28 2006 09:01 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:

Quote:
Going anywhere nice

I’m doing a runner

Thanks for the links. Will check them out

Can i come too? Want to top up my tan

——————–
If you require support, please call Steve on 07962 475020 or go to http://www.koptalk.info

– – – – – – – – –
Biff
Gold Member
***
Reged: Feb 21 2004
Posts: 2293
Loc: Birmingham

Re: Cheap flights [Re: Dunk]
#1658633 – Thu Sep 28 2006 09:10 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:

Quote:
Going anywhere nice

I’m doing a runner

Thanks for the links. Will check them out

CSA finally caught up with you…..

——————–


I doubt you’ll be going anywhere too far myself though, because thanks to your greed you’ve even got your mam in trouble over her dodgy taking of money meant for Lauren. So she can’t lend you the cash for a flight, and you’ve no doubt spent most of what was left on cameras, scaffolding and hotel rooms.

Maybe he posted the flight thing for us as part of a two-part mini-series. Here’s part two, with special guest star Smooch the Noo Yoiker with no mates…


DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10798
Loc: KOPTALK

Where you work?
#1657836 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:29 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

If inside, what’s it like? Does it get hot? I ask because on Wednesday I couldn’t bear the heat

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
SmooveAdministrator
The Bouncer
***
Reged: Jan 21 2006
Posts: 200
Loc: New York

Re: Where you work? [Re: Dunk]
#1657839 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:30 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

I’m a slave! And its hot as hell!

——————–
You’ll Never Walk Alone… but if you **** with us, you’ll walk with a limp…

New English Premier League Champions Liverpool Fc 2006 – 2007

Edited by Smoove (Thu Sep 28 2006 12:48 AM)

– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10798
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Where you work? [Re: Smoove]
#1657843 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:34 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Roger.

——————–

Why on earth he needs to post such crap on his already crap site is beyond me, but seeing as he and Smoochy met up playing games on their xboxes against each other it may just be part of some fantasy they have. Maybe it’s a game where Dunk is using a radio and he has to say “Roger”. Or maybe rogering is part of the fantasy. Dunk used to have a hobby playing with radios at one time. He was into scanners and such like, way back in his Del Johnson days. Funnily enough, (and clearly a complete coincidence, nothing to do with any kind of insurance scam I am sure) someone on his own street in Scarborough recently reported some expensive radios of the type Dunk used to talk on Usenet about as having been stolen from their car! Purely a coincidence though I’m sure. Read about it here.

Next up, a quick plug for Dunk’s fave film, from “Katie” who may or may not actually post messages herself sometimes. It’s the one directed and written by Mr Jefferies of course, he who supposedly wanted to invest in LFC and supposedly posts on Koptalk.


KatieAdministrator
KopTalk Support
***
Reged: Jul 11 2006
Posts: 295

Finally!!!
#1658645 – Thu Sep 28 2006 09:22 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

There has more than likely already been posts about this in the past, but tonight I finally managed to sit down and watch Goal, and i have to say it is a great film! Dont know why but i couldnt stop watching it! mainly because i couldnt find the remote to pause it

——————–
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10801
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Finally!!! [Re: Katie]
#1658664 – Thu Sep 28 2006 09:36 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

You should have consulted me before posting this… you’ll get slated, trust me

——————–

I’ve not seen it myself to be honest, so I can’t really comment. Must be really crap judging by Dunk’s reply. The one where he uses his own name. We all now know that one of Dunk’s family members really is called Katie, and she gets paid a bit of cash-in-hand from Dunk to lock people out of his forums on his behalf. We also know that Dunk logs on as her from time-to-time. He also logs on as “ST3” for example. That’s two examples of real people who Dunk pretends to be on occasion. There’s also the fictional ones too – remember “Wallet”? Here’s a lovely tale all about him…


thesilverfoxlfc
Gold Member
**
Reged: Nov 18 2005
Posts: 1757
Loc: Ireland

Any word from the Wallet….
#1657808 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:15 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

….about investment and all that caper he should know a few things as it seems there is ripples in the water concerning takeover or investment.

——————–
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: thesilverfoxlfc]
#1657815 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:19 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Is this THE wallet as in Parry or the wallet from here? Apparently he’s one of my aliases

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
iangarratt1
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jun 24 2005
Posts: 1385
Loc: eire

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Dunk]
#1657818 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:22 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
Is this THE wallet as in Parry or the wallet from here? Apparently he’s one of my aliases

one of 40 apparently! (Could be 40 Ian, it could be. I’ve not counted. But if you are daft enough to believe that “Wallet” is anyone other than the big S*n-lover himself then you really are quite gullible.)

——————–
hellllo……hellllo!!!!!!!!!!!
dog leash
bellamy fanclub member no. 007

– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: iangarratt1]
#1657823 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:24 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
one of 40 apparently!

Yeh and you’e on of ’em

——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
thesilverfoxlfc
Gold Member
**
Reged: Nov 18 2005
Posts: 1757
Loc: Ireland

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Dunk]
#1657825 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:25 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
Is this THE wallet as in Parry or the wallet from here? Apparently he’s one of my aliases

No the wallet here aint he close to RP?

——————–
– – – – – – – – –
iangarratt1
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jun 24 2005
Posts: 1385
Loc: eire

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Dunk]
#1657829 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:26 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:

Quote:
one of 40 apparently!

Yeh and you’e on of ’em

so im having a conversation with myself! (At the rate Koptalk is losing members you soon will be)
– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: thesilverfoxlfc]
#1657830 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:26 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Let me see when he was last on. (Could do with a drum roll here…)
– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Dunk]
#1657832 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:28 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

He’s been on recently but hasn’t posted for a month. Have emailed him (Keep those drums rolling…)
– – – – – – – – –
carras_boot
Gold Member
*
Reged: May 16 2006
Posts: 89
Loc: Moreton, Wirral

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: thesilverfoxlfc]
#1657863 – Thu Sep 28 2006 01:04 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Wherabouts of the wallet = Getting LEATHERED.

boom boom

– – – – – – – – –
andyzbox
Gold Member
***
Reged: Sep 24 2002
Posts: 187
Loc: Earth

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: carras_boot]
#1658084 – Thu Sep 28 2006 10:52 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

LOL!! I thought wallet was a silver member so maybe he dont have access since the changes…..
– – – – – – – – –
Eth
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jun 29 2005
Posts: 1920
Loc: Dun na nGall / Ireland

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: andyzbox]
#1658092 – Thu Sep 28 2006 11:01 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

I heard that the wallet banned himself
– – – – – – – – –
PaulC
Gold Member
**
Reged: Mar 02 2004
Posts: 669
Loc: bristol, from dublin

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Dunk]
#1658118 – Thu Sep 28 2006 11:30 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Quote:
He’s been on recently but hasn’t posted for a month. Have emailed him

could you not ask yourself the question rather than emailing yourself?
– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: PaulC]
#1658137 – Thu Sep 28 2006 11:45 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote
Quote:
could you not ask yourself the question rather than emailing yourself?

There goes another rib
——————–
http://www.koptalk.coN

– – – – – – – – –
Ryan_Derrick
(In amongst what seems a good proportion of members who know the truth about Dunk we get the odd one who seems completely unaware. If you know “Ryan_Derrick” let him know, he stands to look a bit daft otherwise.)
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Sep 15 2003
Posts: 2641
Loc: Paddock Wood / Islington

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Griffo]
#1658145 – Thu Sep 28 2006 11:51 AM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

Does no-one think he might not have posted any info because he doesn’t have any?
Give the guy a break, I’m sure he’ll pass on any info when he gets it.
– – – – – – – – –
DunkAdministrator
KopTalk Daddy
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10803
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Any word from the Wallet…. [Re: Ryan_Derrick]
#1658215 – Thu Sep 28 2006 12:43 PM
Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote

He’s just emailed me. Says he’s locked out but has been busy. I’ve asked Steve to sort him out. (You can stop that drum roll now. I thought we’d had the “Wallet” locked out before?)

——————–

Dunk’s not got as much time to use his aliases now though – he’s far too busy starting topics off in the desperate hope that it will get some interest. And he really does sound desperate, and very replies are forthcoming from his remaining guests…

So – is it worth thirty quid yet? Not a chance. Especially when you can keep checking out if it’s worth it by looking here – for free.

Welcome to Koptalk.coN

Dunk’s probably in his element that two of his favourite teams have visited Anfield in the space of just days.

After deciding to hide most of his site from the onlooking eyes of those who are investigating him (as if a thirty quid fee would stop them) there’s little need to tell you what happens at Koptalk in many ways. However we don’t want anyone hoodwinked into joining, so let’s see what he’s saying on the ten-grand-a-year server that hosts about a dozen pages.

Read the rest of this entry »

We want our club back

I touched on this to some extent at the weekend, but I’ve decided to touch on it a bit more in light of some pathetic attempts to backtrack from Koptalk.

Love Liverpool? Boycott Koptalk.

Why?

The list is long. However try this one…

Would a Liverpool fan site worth visiting make up a story about a Liverpool player which is not only false, but designed to cause problems for that player, and also the club?

Koptalk does, and does it regularly.

Photo from the Liverpool EchoWe’ve spoken on this blog a few times now about Koptalk’s attempts to paint Robbie Fowler as a player with an alcohol problem, who even missed training due to still being drunk from the night before. In fact Fowler had a throat infection, he could barely speak. He had still turned up at Melwood though, but he was clearly unwell. Koptalk at that time were in league with someone who can be best described as a shady bar owner. The shady bar owner would chat on the phone to the shady website owner, and together they’d cook up stories with occasional facts in them. The facts were rare though, and hard to find in the midst of lies and exaggeration. Fowler wasn’t suffering with alcohol problems – it was a lie, and the act of someone who deserves to be described as SCUM. Duncan Oldham is Koptalk, Duncan Oldham is Scum.

Photo from the Liverpool EchoWe also saw one of his lies unfold in the summer. This time Peter Crouch was the victim. On that occasion Koptalk’s owner tried to justify his own support of the despised “newspaper” The Sun by saying Peter Crouch gave an exclusive interview to that rag. Liverpool players don’t give exclusives to The S*n. Liverpool players avoid it. Oldham even tried to claim he had a tape of that interview, and that he would be using it to end Peter Crouch’s Liverpool career when he felt like it. A lie, again. Scum, again.

As if he’s got something against Liverpool strikers, now he picks on Craig Bellamy. The Koptalk owner doesn’t just own Koptalk – he owns a Newcastle season ticket. Perhaps he’s got his own reason to hate the former Newcastle player Bellamy then. As the owner of this so-called fan site, why the hell does he want to screw things up for our players? He’s not a fan, that’s why. No fan would go out of his way to try and discredit a Liverpool player with completely false and unfounded bullshit.

Koptalk would though, which is why they need to be avoided.

Photo from the Liverpool EchoLast Friday Koptalk had a representative hanging around outside Melwood, Liverpool’s training ground. It was the day before the derby. The representative was Duncan Oldham’s relative, 17-year-old Steve. Back in Wallsend, Duncan Oldham was logged onto the Koptalk website using the “ST3” username. If the following stuff gets confusing, it’s because Duncan Oldham was pretending to be Steve, pretending he was logged in from his laptop outside Melwood.

We were treated to this post on Friday, and we still haven’t a clue what the “****” is supposed to represent. Probably some old Yorkshire saying for being angry, but I’ve no idea…


ST3 KopTalk Editor
Reged: Sep 12 2003
Posts: 7993
Bellamy
#1636687 – Fri Sep 08 2006 02:13 PM
He was full of **** when he left Melwood today and a member of staff commented as to why ‘off the record’. I won’t say any more because what I was told could just be a Blue winding me up before the derby

And so we had the first hints of bullshit. Oldham (pretending to be Steve) saying that he had some information on Bellamy; he had to tell us he had information, but he couldn’t tell us what it was. This tends to result in speculation increasing about what the dirt might be. And it gives Oldham time to make it up in more detail.

Later on in the thread someone asked if there was any point to giving out this rubbish. Oh yes, said Oldham, we’ll be using this to stir the shit up once we’ve got a situation to fit our bullshit. Of course he doesn’t say it quite like that…

ST3 KopTalk Editor
Reged: Sep 12 2003
Posts: 7993
Re: Bellamy [Re: Razor1970]
#1636816 – Fri Sep 08 2006 03:54 PM Reply
Quote:
So is there any point to this post at all?
Yes if something arises later. Nothing to see here people, move on.

Next day, with the derby due to kick off at 12.45pm BST, the teams are finally announced. Bellamy isn’t included in the starting line-up, and in fact he’s not even in the 16-man-squad for the match at all. Rafael Benítez is asked why by the Sky Sports PPV reporter – he says it’s because he’s only allowed to pick 16 players, and he hasn’t got room for two strikers on the bench. It was a pretty standard explanation and perfectly acceptable to any Liverpool fan. It’s not so acceptable to someone who wants to look for something not there in an attempt to stir shit.

This, of course, brings us to that odious thief from the North East. On Saturday, at 12.12pm, half-an-hour before kick off, he posts this…


ST3 KopTalk Editor
Reged: Sep 12 2003
Posts: 7993
What I was told about Bellamy
#1637474 – Sat Sep 09 2006 12:12 PM
Ok he wasn’t winding me up then! I didn’t want to post it yesterday incase it wasn’t true and because it’s a huge game. The reason I made the brief post yesterday about him was just incase something did come up today so you’d know I wasn’t winding you up.
Anyway one of the guys at Melwood said Bellamy had allegedly kicked off in the changing rooms after the morning training session. I was told he’d been left out of the squad but we thought that it was just Bluenose propaganda.
Bellamy was “furious” said our source. As I said yesterday when he left Melwood he was full of ****. He certainly wasn’t going to stop when he drove off where as nearly all the other players did.
I didn’t want to post this yesterday as it could have distracted our preparations. I hope you appreciate that.
*** Further: I need to add a correction/clarification. The source said because of something that allegedly happened in the changing rooms, that was why he would not figure today. He didn’t allegedly kick off because he wasn’t going to figure today. In other words, the source claimed he was dropped today because of an alleged incident. There were no signs of any problems during training when they were all together as a group.
Edited by ST3 (Sat Sep 09 2006 01:01 PM)

I only saw this bullshit after the edit, so I’ve no idea what caveats he’s added between the original post and this version, or what he’s added to make it sound more convincing.

To cut the bullshit short, Duncan Oldham wanted to tell anyone who would listen to him that Craig Bellamy was dropped from the Liverpool squad after he’d caused some kind of trouble in the changing rooms at Melwood.

Some people reading this, at this stage, may be thinking that I’m wrong and Oldham’s right. He’d heard something and told everyone about it, and that I’m just being too loyal to LFC to be able to hear the truth. Once upon a time I might have thought the same way myself, but then I saw the light. Once you’ve spotted one of Oldham’s lies you spot them all. A mile off.

He couldn’t leave it there either. After Liverpool had fallen to the defeat most Reds want to forget, we had to listen to this comment from Scarborough’s most famous conman. He put this on the remnants of his so-called “free” site, and it no doubt got him some extra hits and maybe even one-or-two poor Reds who unwittingly subscribed to the site that lies to survive. As is common practice with Oldham, he talks about a story and tries to get readers to think that if they’d been members they’d know about it all in advance. In this case it’s true, because he made the crap up in the first place. His story was a lie, so how could any other site hear it first?


COMMENT: ‘Bad Boy’ Bellamy left out as Reds stuffed at Goodison

The decision by Rafa Benitez to leave Craig Bellamy out of the squad may have come as a surprise to you today but as alluded to our members yesterday, something just didn’t seem right at Melwood yesterday.
We were told at Melwood yesterday by a member of the staff at the training complex about an alleged incident after the morning session. “Bellamy lost it in the changing rooms,” claimed the source and according to them, he hadn’t kicked off because he was to play no part in the derby, he was to play no part in the derby because of him kicking off. If he did, or what about, we don’t know (yet).
When Steve told me this yesterday I told him to keep it to himself and not to say much on the eve of a huge game against the enemy. I told him that it sounded like propaganda because of the derby and that the source was probably a Bluenose.
We even spoke about it on the podcast but until today, I was dismissive of the suggestions. Whether you choose to read into things any further or whether you actually believe something has gone off is up to you. Personally I expect to see Bellamy back in the squad for next week’s PSV game. I’m sure his absence will be played down although Rafa avoided questions about his omission before the match.
Losing to Everton today was hard to take. I thought the boss might start with Robbie Fowler as he was fresh and I guess Crouch was the in-form striker. I would have liked to have seen Bellamy involved though so I guess that adds to the frustration.
It certainly didn’t look like the Liverpool we know out there today. Bellamy may have been absent but many big names were AWOL today.
Ah well. It’s Saturday and I feel the need to go and drown my sorrows.
Before signing off, please can I remind you that although KOPTALK is now a members website, we do provide free podcast episodes with all the days LFC news, most days of the week. We’re not going to do one this evening but we will throw one together around lunchtime on Sunday. Please get contributing as you’re the stars!
http://www.koptalk.coN/podcast
Dunk
KOPTALK COMMENT

From start to finish that “comment” is designed to make Bellamy out to be a troublemaker who was punished for his actions in the dressing rooms. It’s bullshit, painful, despicable bullshit from the mouth of a conman who wants to make money at all costs, including ripping off Reds and trying to ruin Reds players.

Why do this? He does it to make money. Bullshit, especially exclusive bullshit, brings hits. Hits bring advertising revenue and potential subscribers. If you didn’t know about him and his track record you’d fall for his bullshit.

Remember, this comment was the first time in a week that he’d put his own name to anything on his sites. He’s still hiding from people who want to have a word with him about other, arguably more serious, bullshit.

By Tuesday he was feeling brave again, but wanted to try and deflect some of the criticism pointing his way, as he made these comments under his own name. Now it’s all because of Everton fans…


Dunk KopTalk Daddy
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 10092
Loc: KOPTALK
Bellamy back to silence the whispers
#1641057 – Tue Sep 12 2006 04:40 PM Reply

If you believe the Evertonians, Bellamy was dropped from squad that got turned over by them because he turned in at Melwood on Friday drunk. Others suggested he’d been out brawling the night before in Wales.. oh and he also levelled Mark Gonzalez in the changing rooms! What a nutta (say it in Welsh, sound much better)!

The truth of the matter is that the lad was clearly gutted not to be involved against the Bluenoses but the good news is he’ll be back to face to PSV this evening and how class will it be if he does play and he manages to bag himself a goal. Everyone will be watching his celebration if he does, even those who will tell you that he just strolled out of Melwood last Friday without a care in the world after hearing he was “rested”.

We were watching the lads train last night on the feed and he certainly looked as happy as Larry. Although we broke the news about him not taking his derby omission that well to our members we did stress that it was nothing to worry about and that he’d be back for the trip to PSV. Much Ado about nothing but you know what the internet drama queens are like. We did our best to play it down but the internet likes a good rumour… trust me, I’m caught up in half of them myself!

Having moved on from the Bellamy drama, I’m excited about Dirk Kuyt getting his first start this evening. I can’t wait to see him unleashed. He’s the man that can destroy PSV if given opportunity do so. Let’s hope that Alonso bucks his ideas up if selected otherwise my campaign to have Salif Diao recalled could gain some ground

So this headline about “‘Bad Boy’ Bellamy” was Koptalk doing “our best to play it down” was it? No Oldham, it was Koptalk doing its best to slur a Liverpool player, something it even tries to do with Rick Parry!

You are a liar Oldham, and more and more Liverpool fans want you to see that we want our club back. We want our Kop back.

We spotted a few references on other sites about how Oldham was wrong. They had to hold back really, something we don’t have to. Although I suppose we do hold back really.

For example there was this, on The Liverpool Way’s Blog.


No Bellamy Bust Up

Craig Bellamy was not dropped for the derby because of any bust-up with Rafa Benitez or any of his team-mates. Rumours have been doing the rounds all over Merseyside (and the internet) since Bellamy was omitted from the squad which lost at Woodison on Saturday, presumably spread by mischief making Evertonians or unscrupulous website owners. There were similar rumours around town about Robbie Fowler when he was left out of the squad for West Ham the other week, and it’s something we are going to have to get used to if Rafa is to persevere with his rotation of players.

Bellamy was left out with the game in Holland against PSV in mind, that’s all there was to it. Barring any late injury or dramatic change of heart by Benitez, Bellamy will almost certainly start the game in Eindhoven alongside Dirk Kuyt. Sadly it’s inevitable that the muck rakers will attempt to stir up trouble as Bellamy is a player with ‘previous’. The first time he was left out of a Liverpool squad, this was always going to happen. The fact it was a derby game must have had them rubbing their hands together with glee. There was no bust up though, no matter what some would have you believe.

From what I hear, Craig Bellamy has settled in very well at Anfield and is very popular with his team-mates, despite moaning as much in training sessions as he does during games!

The writer of that article, Dave U, does have contacts inside Melwood, inside Anfield, inside the Academy. He exchanges texts with Carra, but Carra isn’t his only contact at the club. If you want to find out the insider info from that site though you have to read it, because you’ll not get headlines screaming out at you about what’s been going on. And you certainly won’t be charged to be told anything either. Donations are optional, as with all other LFC fan-sites that accept money from fans.

Another site spoke about it; this time referring to the article Dave U had written, but no doubt wanting to ensure that the truth got as much coverage as Oldham’s lie. It’s easy to guess what he means by “Usual dodgy websites”…


Bellamy bust-up nonsense
By Adam Bryant

Tuesday 12th September 2006
Ignore the gossip on the usual dodgy websites – Craig Bellamy has not had a bust-up at the training ground as some have reported.
According to Dave Usher, editor of The Liverpool Way fanzine and a man with real sources at the club, the only reason Bellamy was left out of the Liverpool squad for Saturday’s derby was to rest him for Tuesday night’s game against PSV Eindhoven, which he will almost certainly start.

More significantly perhaps, and certainly in a much more high-profile setting, was the article from the Echo’s Chris Bascombe. Not for the first time he had to write an article pointing out one of Oldham’s lies. No publicity for the fat conman who owns the http://www.spursarmy.com domain this time though. He pointed out in this article about how Rafa had to address the false allegations about a bust-up created by Koptalk.


All change up front
Sep 12 2006
By Chris Bascombe, Liverpool Echo

DIRK KUYT and Craig Bellamy will be given the opportunity to unleash their derby frustration on PSV Eindhoven tonight.

The £15m strike duo will be paired in Holland, as the Reds seek an instant return to form in their opening Champions League group tie.

Neither player started at Goodison on Saturday, and Rafa Benitez was forced to shrug off ridiculous rumours of a bust-up with Bellamy following the Welshman’s absence from the squad.

A lot of people who read this blog support our stance that Koptalk needs stopping. We also get a lot of readers arriving for the first time after stumbling upon our site from elsewhere. However there is another type of reader that we get – Liverpool supporters who still, for reasons I really, genuinely, cannot fathom, STILL, support Koptalk.

Why? Why support the liar who will make any story up, no matter how hurtful, no matter how potentially damaging, just to make himself some money?

I’ve no idea what mood Bellamy was in on Friday when he left Melwood, nor have I any idea on what mood he was in when he first heard he was out of the 16-man match day squad. If he was upset then it shows passion, which we can’t grumble about in a day and age where so many footballers play just for money. If Bellamy had Oldham’s attitude he’d be happy to be getting paid for doing nothing that day. If Oldham had been a footballer he’d probably have still been as fat, because he’d be the type of player happy to earn a fortune for sitting in the reserves. He’d have broken club guidelines and sold a story to The S*n.

And who’s next on Koptalk’s hit list? They seem to like having a go at our strikers, except perhaps Djibril Cissé, because they got more hits by trying to set off arguments in their forums about him. They had visitors in those days.

I really hope that new players like Jermaine Pennant, Fabio Aurelio, Mark Gonzalez and the rest don’t read Koptalk and assume it’s a site to trust. Or even that it’s a site to like. Carra and the rest will no doubt put them straight.

Photo from the Liverpool EchoAnd as for who will be next, well seeing as he’s tried with 3 out of our 4 first-choice strikers so far, I’d say it’s a safe bet that his next target will be Dirk Kuyt. So watch out Dirk; a fat conman from the North East of England is probably going to start making stories up about you soon. You don’t need to worry though – most Reds already know what he’s like, he appeals more to Evertonians that Liverpudlians.

Love Liverpool? Stop Koptalk.

NB: I noticed a couple of days ago that a user with a display name of MJ007 posted once or twice on Koptalk. This user claims, quite blatantly, to be Mike Jefferies, he who wrote / directed the Newcastle United “Goal” film and of course a one-time potential investor in Liverpool FC. Well Mr Jefferies, either get Duncan Oldham to apologise for falsely using your name on his site, or explain what the hell you are doing contributing to a site that so clearly wants to hurt our club.

If you don’t then nobody, no true Red, will ever want you setting foot inside Anfield, let alone being part of any group taking over the club.

Koptalk is Anti-LFC. Liverpool fans boycott Koptalk.