Newcastle rip-off continues for Liverpool fans

It’s a question we’ve asked over and over again. What do you get for your £30 membership fee at Koptalk? Are Liverpool supporters getting a good deal or are they being ripped off?

Koptalk is a site run by a former citizen of Scarborough from a portakabin in the Wallsend area of Newcastle, a site which can only be accessed after paying a £30 membership fee, which will be reduced by £10 if you send cash through the post to him. Duncan Oldham is that individual, and his claims to be a Liverpool fan are often contradicted by his actions. Recently he claimed he was “impartial” about Liverpool, which roughly translates as him not being a fan at all, as we’ve long suspected.

After promising to close down his free site and concentrate on his members only, Duncan Oldham, the eternal liar in charge of Koptalk has now started offering his misleading headlines for free again. How many people signed up to Koptalk’s Gold Club / Members site just because Oldham had withdrawn his free made-up and exaggerated ripped off tales? £30 so that they can get this is a rip-off in itself really, but now they find they can get it free.

Oldham lies and cheats Reds every day. For example when he says this…

“Exclusive news and reports from inside Anfield and Melwood”

…on his sign-up pages, he’s telling a complete lie. The only way his stories can be described as “Exclusive” is because nobody else has made those stories up. We’ve still to see one exclusive from Oldham since the blog started.

Another thing offered, and illegal it may be, but if Koptalk say this is part of what you get for the £30…

“*Links to FREE audio and/or video of LFC first team matches – watch and listen live!”

…then Liverpool fans should be able to expect a well-organised section containing links to each game. All fully explained in detail. They don’t get that though. Since the early part of the season the best that’s been offered is a link that every other LFC site with a forum seems to mention, to a site with “myp2p” in its URL. Often the link has been provided by the Koptalk owner using an alias as his sign-in, in his pathetic attempts to hide from those who will prosecute him for his dodgy dealings. Considering he’s charging £30 for this, Liverpool fans don’t want to have to mess around and this site he refers to – “myp2p” is nothing to do with him. Save your money and go directly to that site, or keep an eye on all the free forums prior to games for links as good as, if not better, than what Oldham offers.

There’s a site that’s often spoken about, “TASS”, that works to provide feeds. They also charge, and no doubt are also at risk of being prosecuted for breach of copyright. Putting the legal issues to one side, I’ve heard a lot of positive and negative feedback about what they offer, but at least they are putting some work in for their fees. Oldham sits on his arse and gets a link off another LFC site (just like you could) and expects to be paid £30 for it. Oldham hasn’t even used part of that £30 to look at this site called “TASS” to see if he can help his members. He knows nothing about it…


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: TASS [Re: Andy_James]
#1693287 – Tue Nov 07 2006 10:55 PM

What does Tass offer? I know nothing about it really.

——————–

What else does Koptalk offer? How about these two…

NEW for 2006-07: Exclusive training sessions reports direct from Melwood
NEW for 2006-07: Exclusive photos direct from Melwood – see the lads train

…both short-lived features. The first one consisted of Dunk or his step-brother / son Steve peering over the Melwood fence and pretending that they understood what the various drills were that the players were going through. The second one consisted of the same conman and his apprentice using a long lens to take photos over the same fence. They got bored after a couple of weeks and that was the end of it.

Although it’s now removed from his list of “features”, Oldham often brags about the great competitions he runs. As far as we can tell, nobody has ever actually received anything by way of a prize.

The latest one, heavily plugged from the front page of Koptalk.coN is this…


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK
NEW COMPETITION
#1691486 – Sun Nov 05 2006 06:51 PM

Dave won the XBOX 360 and his wife has never forgiven us! Kop 5 is waiting to take receipt of his multi-satellite receiver that he won in our last comp, with that one closing, we now need to run a new competition!

Having had a look around for ideas, our next comp will be for a Nintento Wii system that are going to be very, very popular!

(removed list of features for the “Wii” system that Oldham had cut and pasted from somewhere)

Details of the competition will be added to the.. you got it… COMPETITIONS FORUM over the next 24 hours!

We’ll pre-order the system from Amazon this evening so it should be here around the official release date.

http://www.wii.com

——————–

Did “Dave” really win this XBOX? “Kop 5” should have got his multi-satellite system by now but still hasn’t. He probably never will. As for this competition, well fatso says that the details would be added in the next 24 hours. He said that on Sunday evening yet by Wednesday morning there was still no sign of it being added. This is what happens when you make things up as you go along.

How about one of the other things offered by Koptalk? All our member areas are moderated 24/7 by KopTalk staff which means you will be free of rival fans and immature Reds that can spoil your entertainment. What this means in reality is that Oldham will decide who he thinks is immature. He’ll decide what can and can’t be said, and with him being so inconsistent it’s hard to work out what you can say.

“Free of…immature Reds…” says the bullshit-ridden sales page for Koptalk. That’s not how it works and those who are members – having paid £30 to be members – are getting quite pissed off at being treated like kids…


kev776
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jan 22 2003
Posts: 2984
Loc: germany

Yet again another thread locked without explanation…….
#1692909 – Tue Nov 07 2006 01:24 PM

Dunc/Mods whoever….

Instead of locking the thread (PLO) because some posts go over the top or get personal, USE THE AUPs it is what they were designed for.

We lose another debate because people are not getting gripped by the morale police.

Can we sort this out please. there were some excellent points raised by individuals who derserve a response.
——————–
tomasjj
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 17 2005
Posts: 7021
Loc: Oslo, Norway
Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation……. [Re: kev776]
#1692915 – Tue Nov 07 2006 01:30 PM

This censoring is getting out of hand.
——————–
juniorgaltieri
Gold Member
**
Reged: Sep 14 2006
Posts: 321
Loc: Hove
Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation……. [Re: kev776]
#1692921 – Tue Nov 07 2006 01:35 PM
Quote:
Dunc/Mods whoever….
Instead of locking the thread (PLO) because some posts go over the top or get personal, USE THE AUPs it is what they were designed for.
We lose another debate because people are not getting gripped by the morale police.

Can we sort this out please. there were some excellent points raised by individuals who derserve a response.

I’d second that…
——————-
Neil Young
Gold Member
***
Reged: Sep 24 2002
Posts: 4841
Loc: London

Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: nonni19]
#1692956 – Tue Nov 07 2006 02:20 PM

It’s very disappointing and it’s tiresome when all of us are treated like naughty children. Not to have an explanation just compounds the disenchantment to be honest.
——————–
kirkby1red
Gold Member
***
Reged: Sep 03 2005
Posts: 1684
Loc: Liverpool
Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: Neil Young]
#1692970 – Tue Nov 07 2006 02:50 PM
I find it incredible that this is happening. This is a MEMBERS forum. The members should have a say in what is considered acceptable or not.

We all agree to abide by the AUP’s. If any posts go against that then say so, and allow pwople to moderate their posts.

People like to have a good debate, especially when so many important events are happening world-wide. What is so wrong with that? The ability to do this in the Gold Bar is an important part of the KT facilities, and one which should not be censored the way it is.

I know Dunk posted a few days back that posts on war or religion were banned but to be honest I was hoping that this was said in jest.

I left school a long time ago, and have no great wish to be treated like a naughty schoolchild again – I’m too old for that. I enjoy taking part in the serious debates on here, even if sometimes I don’t agree with the views of other posters. I have never resorted to bad language, or insults in an effort to get my viws across.

If other posters have done that, then let them be put in a sin bin (ie refused permission to post) for a couple of days as a penalty for breaking the AUP.

To delete a post, and inflict censorship on everyone is ou of order in my view.

Come on Dunk, and the rest of you Mods, sort this out and stop inflicting wholesale censorship on everyone.
——————–
nonni19
Gold Member
***
Reged: Jul 02 2004
Posts: 946
Loc: Iceland

Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: kirkby1red]
#1692981 – Tue Nov 07 2006 03:06 PM

Couldn´t agree more. This censorship is getting out of control and is turning people off the site. There is not much more irritating than wathcing threads disappear withough warning or explanation!
——————–
stuart morse
Moderator
***
Reged: Jun 14 2003
Posts: 11188
Loc: leeds, via Cardiff, Wolverhamp…

Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: kirkby1red]
#1692985 – Tue Nov 07 2006 03:11 PM

Kirby and Neil,

I have only just been alerted to the particular post and thought that it was a little OTT, although not worth locking the whole thread over. A deletion of the single post or a sin bin for the individual would be a better idea in my opinion.

I didn’t delete the thread, and agree that better moderation is required. We are adults after all and debate is a very healthy way of learning about stuff. I for one rarely add anything to the religion/politics threads, but I enjoy a good read…it increases my knowledge base.
——————–

So how did the self-titled “Daddy” deal with these kids?


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: stuart morse]
#1693011 – Tue Nov 07 2006 03:42 PM

Dunk will respond shortly… I’m just having a cuppa
——————–

That was at 3.42PM. Nine words. 17 minutes later, after a lot of thought and consideration his answer was…


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK
Re: Yet again another thread locked without explanation….. [Re: kev776]
#1693024 – Tue Nov 07 2006 03:59 PM

Sorry for locking the thread. A mod called me and asked me what to do. I said don’t delete it, lock it and I’ll take a look. It’s my fault, I will re-open it.
——————–

34 words. Well done Dunk – 30 seconds per word. Why, if what you’ve just said was true, did it take you so long to come with this answer. 34 words mainly of one syllable too. I think what really happened is this. You screwed up. You have upset many of your main crop of current regular participants. You’ve tried to wriggle out of it.

So – Liverpool fans who want to be treated like adults are best avoiding Koptalk – the overweight thief of domain names, who has a message “You’ve been pied” on the domains he’s stolen from other Liverpool websites, is sure to decide you are immature.

Back to the exclusive stories and insider information. Dunk was asked a question about investment, and because he’s not got a clue due to having NO CONTACTS AT ANFIELD WHATSOEVER he had to make something up…


LFCStanmore
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jul 12 2005
Posts: 278
Loc: Stanmore & Liverpool
Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news
#1692766 – Tue Nov 07 2006 10:46 AM
Dunk

Any more news on the latest in the non starter so far of Investment / takeover.

Thanks
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: LFCStanmore]
#1692795 – Tue Nov 07 2006 11:08 AM

Nothing. Last I heard was Morgan was going to meet up with Moores but haven’t heard anything else since.
——————–
LFCStanmore
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jul 12 2005
Posts: 278
Loc: Stanmore & Liverpool
Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: Dunk]
#1692822 – Tue Nov 07 2006 11:47 AM
Interestingly enough I spoke to a friend of mine who knows the now departed Noel White. It does appear that his comments were due to frustration at the lack of progress on the investment front and were not meant to critisise Rafa or destabilise. Misguided, but intended to nudge in the right direction
– – – – – – – – – – – –

Dunk at this stage of course is getting excited. This “LFCStanmore” seems to be making up the same stories that fatso made up to cover up his complete lack of information over the Noel White resignation. Here comes Dunk…


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK
Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: LFCStanmore]
#1692837 – Tue Nov 07 2006 12:11 PM
Yeh that’s what I was told. Listen out for anything to do with Keith Clayton
——————–
LFCStanmore
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jul 12 2005
Posts: 278
Loc: Stanmore & Liverpool
Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: Dunk]
#1692846 – Tue Nov 07 2006 12:21 PM
I presume you have no timescale on potential developments. If only Morgan would have offered Moores a “fair / correct” price rather than trying to talk the clubs value down to a price level where West Ham and Villa are being sold
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: LFCStanmore]
#1692848 – Tue Nov 07 2006 12:23 PM

No it’s quiet mate. Those that usually want to talk a lot aren’t talking at all.
——————–

In other words, no contacts and no time to make anything up…


1 True Red
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Jan 21 2003
Posts: 1514
Loc: North Wales
Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: Dunk]
#1692854 – Tue Nov 07 2006 12:27 PM

Quote:
Yeh that’s what I was told. Listen out for anything to do with Keith Clayton

Can you elaberate a bit more Dunk!
——————–

How can he? He doesn’t know anyone. He has NO INSIDE CONTACTS at all. Anyone who joined his site for that reason has been ripped off.


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK
Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: 1 True Red]
#1692857 – Tue Nov 07 2006 12:29 PM

Sadly, no.
——————–
kirkby1red
Gold Member
***
Reged: Sep 03 2005
Posts: 1684
Loc: Liverpool

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: kopite.keith]
#1693155 – Tue Nov 07 2006 08:03 PM

Dunk, slightly off topic I know but what’s the latest with the stadium?

I know we had the notice from the council a few weeks ago but there hasn’t been anything from the club as far as I know regarding when they are gong to start building.

Is all the money definately in place or are we still looking for some financial input? If we are does that mean that there is still a questionmark over whether the new stadium goes ahead?

Be glad for some sort of update if possible.

——————–
Dave100
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Oct 23 2003
Posts: 5338
Loc: Wigan

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: kopite.keith]
#1693162 – Tue Nov 07 2006 08:14 PM

Was it you who hinted at something last week? Said you might hear more over the weekend?
——————–

Ah! Dunk has promised more information has he? Right in the middle of one of his tall tales? And now he’s forgotten the bits he’d added in.


Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: kirkby1red]
#1693188 – Tue Nov 07 2006 08:56 PM

Quote:
Dunk, slightly off topic I know but what’s the latest with the stadium?

Just that everything is “supposed” to be on course. It is a subject that does little for me mate. I’m personally not concerned and I think it will go ahead, whether that will be under Moores I don’t know.
——————–
Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: Dave100]
#1693200 – Tue Nov 07 2006 09:13 PM

It’s the most boring thing to do with the club. I hate it.
——————–
Dunk
KopTalk.com
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 12185
Loc: UK

Re: Investment/takeover – Dunk – Any more news [Re: Dave100]
#1693206 – Tue Nov 07 2006 09:19 PM

Yes, until this is finally sorted there will be no real stability.
——————–

So Dunk – this weekend news… WHERE IS IT? There was none of course, because Dunk MADE IT ALL UP.

So far so good – Dunk has proved in a couple of days of posts that his site is a rip-off. But we’ll carry on a little longer with this in case anyone is in any doubt. How about….

*Links to first team goals usually within a few minutes of full-time (3rd party)

…which of course is worded carefully, along with some anti-accessibility text, to make you think Dunk will let you see all the LFC goals on his site as part of your £30 fee. He is very nervous though about actually providing the goals himself because he knows it’s illegal and he knows that he shouldn’t be making money for it. But Oldham can’t provide the goals or even the links to the goals all the time now. Take “Joxer” who was looking for some highlights from the Champions League. After all, legal or not, he’s paid for them. He asked about it…


Joxer
Gold Member
**
Reged: Aug 02 2005
Posts: 250
Loc: Dublin, Ireland

Does anyone have highlights of last nights Match?
#1688009 – Wed Nov 01 2006 06:19 AM

Or do they know where to get them? (for free)

I know the official site has them but gotta sign up.
——————–
lee909
Gold Member
***
Reged: Apr 25 2005
Posts: 1634
Loc: Watford

Re: Does anyone have highlights of last nights Match? [Re: Joxer]
#1688199 – Wed Nov 01 2006 10:47 AM

ITV said somthing about being able to watch the game online any time during the next wek i think
it was cost a subscription though 1.99 for 36hr pass or 20 for season
——————–
Joxer
Gold Member
**
Reged: Aug 02 2005
Posts: 250
Loc: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Does anyone have highlights of last nights Match? [Re: lee909]
#1688901 – Thu Nov 02 2006 06:28 AM

cheers mate
——————-

So, where are they Dunk? Why haven’t you answered this member? BECAUSE YOU HAVE RIPPED HIM OFF!

Also ripped off are the owners of the copyright for these photos, advertised from the front page of Koptalk.coN, which will not have been paid for from the agency, who’ll have expected a three-figure sum for EACH PHOTO…


KOPTALK.COMAdministrator
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 25490
Liverpool 2-0 Reading – PHOTOS
#1690826 – Sat Nov 04 2006 05:08 PM
These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN

These photographs have been stolen by Koptalk.coN
——————

Next was something that had been floating around the net for a few days…


KOPTALK.COM
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 25490

Otsemobor linked
#1691222 – Sun Nov 05 2006 12:01 PM

Former Liverpool defender Jon Otsemobor has been linked with a possible return to the club.

The Crewe Alexandra vice-captain has been putting in some fine performances since leaving Liverpool for Rotherham in 2004. He then signed for Crewe on a free.

Jon was expected to have a long Liverpool career so it was a surprise when he failed to make the grade.

The link is very speculative but it’s still worth a mention.

——————–

The link may well be very speculative, but Oldham, if you’ve got inside information and contacts from over that Melwood wall and behind the doors of Anfield, why can’t you find something more concrete out?

It wasn’t a problem for someone from another website. Thanks to one of our readers for pointing this out from TLW. In a thread here – http://forum.liverpoolway.co.uk/showthread.php?t=39066 site owner and editor of the fanzine, Dave Usher says: “I asked a mate of Semmy’s the other day about the rumours linking him with a return, but he hadn’t heard anything about it. He phoned Semmy and asked him, but he knew nothing about it either.”

You never get ANYTHING like that on Koptalk, unless it’s made up. NEVER. Another example of the rip-off that is Koptalk. Koptalk charge £30 to not provide insider information. TLW ask for optional donations to keep their forums running, and if you use their site you’ve a good chance of getting regular inside information.

The next one was less of a rip-off, more of a piece of shitty misleading headling writing. On the Koptalk.coN site, designed to draw you in and consider parting with that £30, was this…

LFC NEWS Striker arrested

Note what it says. Four words. Starts with “LFC News” – so it’s got to be about our club. Then “Striker arrested” – so it’s got to be one of OUR strikers; Fowler, Crouch, Kuyt or Bellamy. (insert Family Fortunes “Ah aaah” noise here) WRONG! It’s about a former Liverpool player, the worst Liverpool number 9 in living memory. The serial spitter and now part of Fat Sam’s alehouse team, Mr El Hadji Diouf.

HE’S NOT AN LFC STRIKER SO IT’S NOT LFC NEWS.


KOPTALK.COMAdministrator
Team Member
***
Reged: Jul 28 2003
Posts: 25490

Diouf arrested
#1692805 – Tue Nov 07 2006 11:19 AM

Former Liverpool striker El-Hadji Diouf, has been arrested over an alleged assault on his wife.

It has been reported that the player’s wife Valerie was hit by the player during the early hours of Sunday morning. She is said to have sustained a bust lip.

Diouf has been bailed pending further inquiries.
——————–

So, Liverpool fans, save your thirty pounds. Even if Koptalk’s disregard of the S*n boycott doesn’t bother you, even if you don’t mind them making up stories about our strikers in an attempt to mess their careers up doesn’t concern you, save that cash.

Koptalk rip Reds off. Avoid at all costs.

Advertisements

25 Responses to “Newcastle rip-off continues for Liverpool fans”

  1. scouse Says:

    What site were the pictures stolen from, Getty images?

    If so have a quick read of the first few and last few 11 page thread at sitepoint – http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=390902

    Getty images are coming down hard, £1000 per stolen image used – wonder if they know about KT…..

  2. latestinsider Says:

    Have just sent a nice little email to Getty images asking them to look at the pieman’s site and investigate whether he has used any of their photos. 8))))

  3. Andy Says:

    The images are from a Press Association company called EMPICS.

    http://search.empics.co.uk/urn/4115934.html
    http://search.empics.co.uk/urn/4115966.html
    http://search.empics.co.uk/urn/4115902.html
    http://search.empics.co.uk/urn/4115813.html

    I’ll send an email them to ask whether Oldham’s paying for them.

  4. Dog Says:

    Good luck to you if this twat is ripping you off but why drag Newcastle into it ,in the title of you article? Your stated that the stain is from scaborough it got nothing to do with NUFC that he lives up here.If you’d asked we would have go round any fired up his portakabin but instead you try to make us out as robbing twats – why ???

  5. rupertinsider Says:

    Dog

    I don’t think the author meant to insult Newcastle. He was pointing out that this guy who rips off Liverpool supporters come from Yorkshire and lives near Newcastle. He’s got nothing to do with Liverpool, he ‘s rarely been here. yet he sells thousands (he says) of memberships in his one man web site from his shed in Wallsend for 30 quid a time and mainly to overseas LFC supporters – and on the basis that he is close to the club.

    The club have disassociated from him. He’s even admits that he is loathed by the club in his phantom book which he has been selling for three years even before he has written a word of it.

    he doesn’t mind being loathed if it means people are taking notice of him.

  6. Insider Insider Says:

    Dog: Sorry if it came across that I was having a go at Newcastle. I think I’ve said it before on here that I’ve nothing against Newcastle the place at all. I’ve only ever had positive experiences when I’ve ever been there and have found the people to be very friendly indeed.

    Did you know that the person behind Koptalk also has a season ticket for Newcastle? And that he started a site called “Up the Toon” where he was no doubt about to start ripping of Newcastle fans too?

    Trouble is it’s Newcastle’s Trading Standards who should be on his back but they seem happy to let him carry on because he’s not really ripping off many Newcastle people at the moment. He’s ripping off people all over the world, but not Newcastle so they seem happy to let it go.

    As I say, I’ve nothing against Newcastle, despite Ant and Dec, although I wish the Trading Standards would make more of an effort.

  7. John Bendix Says:

    Just to distance this con-man a bit further from Newcastle, Wallsend is in North Tyneside, not the great metropolis itself, so if you want legal action it’s North Tyneside Trading Standards you’d have to approach, assuming they’ve got powers to act anyway.

    Good luck, anyway, in seeing off this twat.

  8. C Davis Says:

    I find it funny of all the teams in the world to contemplate complaining about fans from other areas – it is you – liverpool home of anyone but scousers that cry the loudest. liverpool and whinge, synonomous isnt it?

    A Makem

  9. mike Says:

    I find it amusing that you complain about misleading headlines and then do a not too dis-similar thing yourself!

    I agree with Dog,

  10. Dog Says:

    PM me I may be able to help.Seriously PM me
    by the way Ive met Ant & Dec a few times and they are genuine and very down to earth

  11. est-er Says:

    “posts about war and religion will be banned”

    FLMAO!

    What an absolute joke his site is. It’s sad to see some sensible names are still posting on there 😦

  12. rupertinsider Says:

    To clarify a point. He is being investigated by the following:
    Alan Burnett
    Senior Trading Standards Officer
    Environment, Regeneration & Housing
    The Killingworth Site
    PO Box 113
    Killingworth
    NE12 6WJ
    Tel:0191-2192634 Fax:0191
    -2192642
    e-mail : alan.burnett@northtyneside DOT gov DOT uk
    For a fuller discussion of this go to to tool bar at the top of the page 5.Shop Oldham and scroll down to near the end “TRADING STANDARDS”

  13. rupertinsider Says:

    “posts about war and religion will be banned”
    He always reacts to what we say on this blog.
    This latest banning of posts about war and religion seems to be his reaction to my article in which I noted the jokes Oldham told about the veils worn by Muslim women and about attendees at a Mosque having the shoes stolen.
    See “Koptalk’s Tower of Babel” 26th October.
    https://koptalkinsider.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/the-united-nations-of-koptalk/#comments
    In that article I mentioned that weird religious and political threads are now the meat and drink at Koptalk. Yet he still claims in his sales pitch that the site is moderated 24 x 7 and has only mature posters – unlike “rival” sites.
    The truth is he will take anyone who pays him 30 doesn’t matter how crazy and off-topic they are.

  14. rupertinsider Says:

    “I find it amusing that you complain about misleading headlines and then do a not too dis-similar thing yourself!”
    Depends what you mean by “not too dis-similar thing”. That’s quite a mouthful 😉
    I agree the author’s title could be read as though it meant NUFC.

    But it didn’t mean NUFC. And it did say what he meant. It meant that the conman ripping off LFC fans does it from Wallsend near Newcastle.

    He also happens to have a web site which purports to be a NUFC supporters’ site. He has a season ticket to NUFC. He claims to have inside information from NUFC, just as he does from LFC. For two years he has been reporting secret conversations he says he has had with “insiders” at NUFC about Owen returning to LFC. He also claims to know the boardroom politics at NUFC. In other words he has started his con game at NUFC, too.

  15. Dog Says:

    SO CHANGE THE TITLE
    Here one you could try
    THEIVING TWAT -RIPPING OFF LIVERPOOL FANS
    see ,concise and is not misleading.You could even do it now.
    ps I live in Killingworth

  16. Sinbad Says:

    “SO CHANGE THE TITLE
    Here one you could try
    THEIVING TWAT -RIPPING OFF LIVERPOOL FANS
    see ,concise and is not misleading.You could even do it now”

    Just goes to prove the point this blogs been making all along.

    ie Misleading Headlines conning the innocent.

    Dog was attracted to this site after seeing his beloved Newcasle in the title.

    At least this blog wont rob you for the privilege, like fatsos been doing to liverpool fans for years.

    Fatsos been

  17. Sinbad Says:

    “SO CHANGE THE TITLE
    Here one you could try
    THEIVING TWAT -RIPPING OFF LIVERPOOL FANS
    see ,concise and is not misleading.You could even do it now”

    Just goes to prove the point this blogs been making all along.

    ie Misleading Headlines conning the innocent.

    Dog was attracted to this site after seeing his beloved Newcasle in the title.

    At least this blog wont rob him for the privilege, like fatsos been doing to liverpool fans for years.

  18. rupertinsider Says:

    “At least this blog wont rob him for the privilege…”

    This blog makes the same amount of revenue if it gets 1 hit or 10,000 – ZERO. It carries no adverts. Therefore, it has no interest in tricking people from Newcastle into reading it.

    Oldham’s misleading headlines have a monetary motive. He doesn’t care where the clicks come as long as they come. He makes more money the more clicks he gets.

    Also his misleading headlines are a way of disguising the fact that he stole the copy. Also, as we have shown, he uses them to disguise the fact that he got the copy from the S** Its his way of breaking the Liverpool-based boycott of the S**

    Because the blog is on News Now we have an interest in headlines that attract those people who are users of Koptalk but don’t know about the blog’s analysis because Oldham has banned PMs and emails and he deletes all posts and threads which try to inform the members over there and bans anyone who tries. We also want to reach those LFC supporters on the net who may be led by Oldham’s false claims into subscribing to his fraudulent Newcastle- area based site.

  19. Loco_Law Says:

    This site is a load of crap. Do you seriously have nothing better to do than to rip on another site that is a members only site? Seriously, you are the reason that there is no free speach anymore. It is a pay site, you have to actually FORCE yourself to read anything that goes on there, you can’t just stumble across it, and then you bitch about it.

    This is just as bad as saying you don’t like Howard Stern, but you’ll listen to it to see how bad it is. WHAT A JOKE!!!! If you don’t like it, DON’T READ IT OR SUPPORT THE SITE BY BEING A PAID MEMBER!!!

  20. rupertinsider Says:

    Hey Loco: I guess you have wandered into a subject you know nothing about.

    He is a con man. He takes money under false pretences. It is not only unethical but also illegal. He uses the name of our club to do it. We are not here to criticise him but to bring him down. Get it?

    If you were to read the blog you would understand how your references to free speech are ironic.

  21. Loco_Law Says:

    No they aren’t ironic. I am not saying that you don’t have the right to say anything, I am saying that it seems like a complete and utter waste of time to be paying for a site that you despise, then bagging what that site says and offers.

    Don’t tell me “I’ve wandered into a subject I know nothing about”. I am a paid member of the site, like what it has to offer, have received a prize and gift from it(that you people say doesn’t happen because it’s a scam), and even though I’ve paid to be a part of it, I fully believe it has 100% more value for the money than the free sites out there. I am, and have been a die hard LFC fan since I was 7 (am now 34) and appreciate the site and the people that run it.

    As for his “Newcastle area based LFC site”, give it a rest. I could host a site in Canada and make it a massive LFC site. It’s the freakin internet!!!! It doesn’t matter where the site is hosted, it can be accessed anywhere. The fact that it’s in Newcastle makes absolutely no difference, and it’s been brought up many times as to where the base of operations is; it’s no secret.

    To reiterate my point,

  22. Loco_Law Says:

    No they aren’t ironic. I am not saying that you don’t have the right to say anything, I am saying that it seems like a complete and utter waste of time to be paying for a site that you despise, then bagging what that site says and offers.

    Don’t tell me “I’ve wandered into a subject I know nothing about”. I am a paid member of the site, like what it has to offer, have received a prize and gift from it(that you people say doesn’t happen because it’s a scam), and even though I’ve paid to be a part of it, I fully believe it has 100% more value for the money than the free sites out there. I am, and have been a die hard LFC fan since I was 7 (am now 34) and appreciate the site and the people that run it.

    As for his “Newcastle area based LFC site”, give it a rest. I could host a site in Canada and make it a massive LFC site. It’s the freakin internet!!!! It doesn’t matter where the site is hosted, it can be accessed anywhere. The fact that it’s in Newcastle makes absolutely no difference, and it’s been brought up many times as to where the base of operations is; it’s no secret.

    To reiterate my point, DON’T PAY FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU DON’T LIKE!!!

    It’s like voting for someone, then complaining about themm then voting for them again.

  23. rupertinsider Says:

    “…and it’s been brought up many times as to where the base of operations is; it’s no secret.”
    If Oldham had let you read the blog you would know that it was a secret – until we revealed it. And even then he tried to confuse the issue claiming Oldham was not his real name and he lived in Scarborough not Wallsend.
    “…to be paying for a site that you despise”
    Neither I nor II have ever paid a penny.

    Perhaps you will tell us about this prize and gift you say you got from Koptalk. And why you when thousands never did?
    You chose to be a member of a SUN-loving, lying, fraudulent site. But you are wrong to claim it is simply a matter of choice. Its not. Its not your choice to receive stolen property or participate in slander – there are laws. You may very well find your choice taken away from you.

  24. Kev Says:

    Rupert…you’re the man. Loco is probably one of his sycophant “honorary members”…any decent red will not support a Sun loving site. Go and suck the Fat Mans dick you cunt!

  25. LSM Says:

    “Don’t tell me “I’ve wandered into a subject I know nothing about”. I am a paid member of the site, like what it has to offer”

    Then you must either be a complete nut, one of the family, or totally stupid.

    Take your pick. Any of the above combination is a healthy pre-requisite for kraptalk. If you can’t see how you’re being conned then you deserve pity, so I wil leave it at that.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: