How Duncan Oldham uses his kids.

Can someone help me? The person behind the failing Koptalk.com has said this in one of his rambles –

“They’re even using photos of my kids now. Unreal eh” 

Where? When? I don’t remember. And if anyone, anywhere has used pictures of Fred West fan Duncan’s kids on the internet let me know.

Apart of course from the Fred West fan himself. Duncan is always using his kid’s photos to plug something or other. Although I’ve avoided using those photos, any sickos out there have access to them. As well as the porn he posts on his site, and the “Adult Friend Finder” ads.

But let’s see where these photos are that “they” are “using” then shall we? When you’ve wriggled out of that one tell us again about the Crouch tape. Tell us about Robbie Fowler (“shut the door on the way out”). Tell us about the Sun hat. Tell us about your daily quotes from the Sun. Tell us about your attacks on Rick Parry. Tell us about why you aren’t in the North West still – you were going to be here all week. Tell us about Lauren and the money you collected for her, to be paid to your mum. Tell us about all of the others lies you tell day in and day out.

probe1
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jun 30 2003
Posts: 1503
Loc: Talacre

Anonymous Members
#1539282 – Mon Jul 10 2006 10:36 PM
Reply to this post Reply

If one goes to the “View whos online” and scroll to the bottom there are Anonymous Members logged in. How can that be? Don’t they need a user name and profile?
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: probe1]
#1539286 – Mon Jul 10 2006 10:37 PM
Reply to this post Reply

Logging out, logging in or going round in circles with a cookie problem
– – – – – – – – – – –
probe1
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jun 30 2003
Posts: 1503
Loc: Talacre

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539289 – Mon Jul 10 2006 10:40 PM
Reply to this post Reply

Most of them where doing that yes,

Thanks for the explanation!
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: probe1]
#1539300 – Mon Jul 10 2006 10:43 PM
Reply to this post Reply

I made someone reasonably happy?

– – – – – – – – – – –
probe1
Gold Member
**
Reged: Jun 30 2003
Posts: 1503
Loc: Talacre

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539384 – Mon Jul 10 2006 11:09 PM
Reply to this post Reply

Yes thanks, why?

Your not upsetting people are you?
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: probe1]
#1539479 – Mon Jul 10 2006 11:54 PM
Reply to this post Reply

Me? No way guvnor
– – – – – – – – – – –
revo
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 24 2003
Posts: 5510
Loc: Liverpool L4 9ug

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539481 – Mon Jul 10 2006 11:55 PM
Reply to this post Reply

hey dunk have you been to malta yet
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: revo]
#1539484 – Mon Jul 10 2006 11:58 PM
Reply to this post Reply

I’m unable to share this information for fear of it circulating the internet

No not yet
– – – – – – – – – – –
revo
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 24 2003
Posts: 5510
Loc: Liverpool L4 9ug

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539498 – Tue Jul 11 2006 12:08 AM
Reply to this post Reply

i havent been payin to much attention to all that other crap. those cu.ts are not worth the time of day. like you said earlier mate dont worry be happy but if one or two of those di.kheads wanna threaten your kids have them come out of the dark and say hello to a couple of us
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: revo]
#1539507 – Tue Jul 11 2006 12:14 AM
Reply to this post Reply

They’re even using photos of my kids now. Unreal eh

Still, such is life old boy, such is life. Soon be the new season.

:
– – – – – – – – – – –
revo
Honorary Member
***
Reged: Feb 24 2003
Posts: 5510
Loc: Liverpool L4 9ug

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539510 – Tue Jul 11 2006 12:16 AM
Reply to this post Reply

is it from xxxxxxx website?

Edited by Dunk (Tue Jul 11 2006 12:38 AM)
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: revo]
#1539526 – Tue Jul 11 2006 12:38 AM
Reply to this post Reply

I don’t comment on other websites. I prefer to let them comment on this one as it helps create publicity. Even though it’s negative, I can assure you that memberships have gone through the roof this summer hence our ambitious plans.

At this rate revo, even the dogs will be eating Sirloin

Joking apart, let’s not discuss other people or other sites. Let them have their fun
– – – – – – – – – – –
Dunk Administrator  KopTalk Editor
****
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8292

Re: Anonymous Members [Re: Dunk]
#1539529 – Tue Jul 11 2006 12:39 AM
Reply to this post Reply

I removed the person’s name. Right mate, early start tomorrow
– – – – – – – – – – –  

More lies – “I don’t comment on other websites. I prefer to let them comment on this one as it helps create publicity. Even though it’s negative, I can assure you that memberships have gone through the roof this summer hence our ambitious plans.” You commented on other websites in the last rant we put on here. And your memberships are not going through the roof are they?

And I see you’ve got to share your tea with your dogs now the missus has cleared off again: “At this rate revo, even the dogs will be eating Sirloin”

Let’s hope she keeps the kids away from you and your dogs Duncan, because you’ll exploit those poor kids any time you get a chance – and I don’t think you’ve any limits as to how far you’ll go.

http://www.anfieldexposed.com/author.shtml

And if he’s decided to move it from there by the time you look, what about this hit-making part of his site from days gone by –

http://www.koptalk.co.uk/regulars/kopkids_about.html 

Advertisements

13 Responses to “How Duncan Oldham uses his kids.”

  1. rupertinsider Says:

    “At this rate revo, even the dogs will be eating Sirloin”

    Now why did that remind of of Jim (and Tammy) Baker the infamous TV evangelists in the USA? Some of you may be familiar with them – they were also shown outside the USA.

    I’ll save the full comparisons for later – but their public cons and frauds were also in the name of sick children and unborn foetus – and they were into acquiring hotels where their lifetime members could stay free – and Jim was into kinky sex with males and females, too.

    When the whole pack of cards and Jim was carted of crying to jail, Jim’s followers were horrified to discover that the man who pleaded poverty every day on TV was feeding prime sirloin steak to his dog which he housed in an air-conditioned kennel.

  2. rupertinsider Says:

    Fatty’s use of an unborn feotus, sick children and orphans to raise money which he directs be sent to his personal bank account (for onward transmission) is well known. Nor is it a new tactic of his to use the same foetus and children to generate sympathy for himself when he comes under scrutiny.

    A few years ago he used it against the first site set up to expose him – http://www.kraptalk.com (There is just a remnant of the original site left over there. It used to have lots of articles and lively forums which were visited by Fatso himself).

    When he could not answer Kraptalk’s specific accusations he started a campaign of lies about the editor of the site. He said that the editor was encouraging people to kidnap and rape his, Duncan’s, 8 year old daughter.

    “Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:49 pm Post subject: KRAPTALK EDITOR IS A CUNT Reply with quote
    would like to explain why you asked people to kidnap dunks daughter and rape her while she was only 8 years old??

    or are you going to reply with a sarcastic comment. strange how people react in different ways when they are getting desperate”

    Pretty weird eh? That’s the melodramtic, soap-opera. propagandised world in which he operates. It demonstrates again his cotempt for the intelligenvce of his readers.

    Its dififcult to take him seriously – but since we have to – lets follow the logic.

    If anyone was encouraging a crimes like kidnap and rape of children let alone their own daugher, don’t you think they would inform the police rather than make accusing on a football site?

    Remember its Fatso who regularly makes cute references to Fred West – even to this day – in his editorials and KT radio commentaries – and who educates the impressionable 16 yr old Steve (as he then was) on KT radio that another convicted rapist of young girls was not doing anything wrong when he was photographed in the park oggling young girls and that, in fact, the rape of young girls is understandable when you get to his age – 32 – and they ignore you.

    The only children he won’t talk about on his site – in fact it is against KT policy to do so – are the Liverpool children killed at Hillsborough. That’s “politics” he says – KT is for entertainment.

    Not that he’s against talking about certain other Liverpool kids – nothing is more likely to pump up his passion in long exchanges on his site than the “thieving” Liverpool “scallies” who ask him for a pound or two to guard his Merc on the rare occasions he goes to Anfield.

  3. Wheresmebook? Says:

    My memory isnt what it used to be but a good few years back didnt Dunk respond to criticisms of his lack of newsgroup posts by claiming his daughter had been raped in school and thats why he went awol for a few days? This was all pre-klaptrap of course.

    It wouldn’t be very nice if it were true but considering the number of times he has referred to a similar scenario when trying to defend himself makes me believe he uses it as an excuse.

    Does anyone else remember this?

  4. rupertinsider Says:

    Insider – I followed your link to that site – which is essentially his version of his resume.

    For the first time I ntoiced this:

    “An offer of £1.3million was rejected for the site which cost less than £100 to get off the ground as a hobby in his bedroom in a small terraced home in Yorkshire. Instead he opted to battle on which proved to be the best decision of his life.”

    So it was a terraced home in Yorkshire – not a DHS bedsitter in central Liverpool as he repeatedly claims!

    He used to show fotos of “his” Liverpool street to show how run-down and nasty it was and how he had to rent a lock-up garage to protect his Merc from the thieving scousers.

  5. rupertinsider Says:

    Wheesmebook – You have jogged my memory with yours.

    “My memory isnt what it used to be but a good few years back didnt Dunk respond to criticisms of his lack of newsgroup posts by claiming his daughter had been raped in school and thats why he went awol for a few days?”

    You have jogged my memory. In fact that maybe how the connection to Kraptalk was developed. Kraptalk would have mocked his claim, maybe retrospectively, and he would have then said they were encouraging the kidnap and rape.

    Maybe Toby would chip in with this.

  6. barry wom Says:

    Fuck me. I don’t remember any of this. This sort of info deserves it’s own blog entry rather than just these comments that some people may miss. I’ve thought for a long time Duncan Oldham was a piece of shit and not much with him would shock me, but with each passing day of this blog, I find myself getting shocked time and again.

  7. String Vest Says:

    Don’t know if its been mentioned on here, but no sooner had the ex kop talkers set up est1892.co.uk, the .org & org.uk variants were snapped up by the crappoodle network.

  8. rupertinsider Says:

    “He’s got ’em on the list – he’s got ’em on the list;
    And they’ll none of ’em be missed – they’ll none of ’em be miss’d!”

    Gilbert & Sullivan knew all about Fatty

  9. rupertinsider Says:

    Here’s a post from “Dermot” on TLW which touches on how Fatty uses kids:

    ” Dermot √

    Re: Oldham has made 100k on pre orders for his “book”
    This is really getting fucking tiresome now.

    There is no anti-KT attitude here as to say that would mean that we have an issue with the ordinary fans that post there, we/I have a problem with Dunk.

    I believe that he is fleecing younger fans (my wee cousin was on there for a while, paid his money, a few weeks later was banned for not paying his money, they kicked off about but in the end he put it down to experience and he is on a different forum). If someone offers you two similar products, one for £30 and one for nothing you are going to take the one that costs nothing.

    I believe that he has fleeced people over his book, and if the figure has reached £100,000 that is something that should be dealt with as that is just theft by another name.

    I believe that he has betrayed the memory of the 96 by posing with his Sun hat on, and by dealing with that rag.

    These are three points that I think are indisputable, and that is before you have a look at the alleagations made by Kraptalk. I said at the the top that I don’t have an issue with people from Koptalk, I should probably quantify that slightly, I do have a problem with Liverpool ‘fans’ that will support Dunk’s involvement with the Sun, and until I see evidence to the contrary I have a problem with someone who supports kids being conned.”

    http://forum.liverpoolway.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34636&page=9&pp=25

  10. lobster Says:

    its amazing how the fatso can twist and lie all the time with his eyes wide open..

  11. Sinon Says:

    re: String Vest – yeah just noticed that! using a .org or .org.uk address sends you to

    http://www.koptalk.com/dontspam

    Fuck off fatty (why do I think of The Yellow Bastard from Sin City when I think of Dunkin?), its not spamming, its simply setting up a fan site. You wouldn’t know what the word fan means, unless its an abreviation of ‘fanatical devotion to money, lies & corruption’

  12. Toby Says:

    Try http://www.kraptalk.co.uk – oh the irony!

    rupert – We did have that forum member accusing us of threatening to kidnap and rape, although I just presumed he was off his head, but I vaguely remember his Newsgroup posting, maybe because it was the only time I actually hoped he was lying. Is there any way of searching the Google Groups for it at all, or are they archived?

  13. rupertinsider Says:

    Toby – hopefully “Captain Scarlett” will come back and find it for us as he found so many of Oldham’s usenet posts under various psuedonyms. You still have some of his work on kraptalk.com

    But that post about the rape of his daughter would have been under Oldham’s own name. If there are any net archive super-sleuths out there – perhaps they could find it. It would have been about 1998-2002.

    My memory is also vague. But I remember it. I remember the universal expression of horror and sympathy for her and her family.

    But I also remember people starting to question it when there was no report in the media, no follow-up from him.

    I remember a few comments about why he would continue to put her at risk by publishing her foto on the net. Perhaps some of those questions were asked on kraptalk – I don’t remember that exactly – but I do remember posts to kraptalk to the effect that because questions had been raised then the editor of kraptalk (you!) was encouraging the kidnap and rape of his 8 year old daughter etc etc.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: