Dunk was clearly stunned at what happened to him in the last Koptalk Insider post we spoke of. As has been pointed out in comments on here, the outburst about Crouch was followed by him going on one of his many benders. It was all around the time he was talking about not much else than how drunk he was planning to get and how the bloggers didn’t bother him. Maybe in his continually drunken state around that time he just blurted things out he’s since forgotten.
He was confronted again by “Barney” about his Crouch tape claims. This was just before 5pm.
Barney Gold Member
Reged: Jul 14 2003 Posts: 108
Re: FAO DUNK:Crouch [Re: Dunk]
#1519113 – Fri Jun 30 2006 04:58 PM
Actually,thinking about it you replied to Brendan when he said that liverpool players dont do interviews with the S*n by saying that they do and that you had the tapes to prove it.
Dunk KopTalk Daddy
Age: 31 Loc: KOPTALK.COM
01-06-06 02:40 PM – Post#215290
In response to brendan
No Brendan, I have the proof right here, I have the tapes. I’m going to lock them away until I decide it’s time for Crouch to be sold… probably next week then.
So how did Fatty respond? A simple admission of guilt, a chance to own up to some of his recent nonsense? Did he take the chance he was being offered to start towards putting things right? Of course not, this is Dunk. It took him over an hour-and-a-half to think up a reply. Unfortunately it wasn’t the most convincing of replies either. In fact, yes, you guessed – it was bullshit…
Dunk KopTalk Editor
Reged: Aug 20 2004
Re: FAO DUNK:Crouch [Re: Barney]
#1519289 – Fri Jun 30 2006 06:37 PM Reply Quote
Brendan is a joker as everyone knows. That was a p*ss take. I can’t believe you thought that was genuine.
Sorry mate but you’ve got the wrong end of the stick big time.
The problem is Dunk, we all knew you didn’t have a Crouch tape. We also knew that you wanted everyone to assume you had. I’ve heard kids say that – “I was only joking” – after telling a lie about something. Or more accurately, being caught telling a lie about something. Were you “joking” about your book? Your lie about being unaware of the Sun boycott – was that a “joke”? Your comments about “foreigners” in Britain – are they all “jokes” too? Insider information in the Insider website – a “joke”? Your claim to have a friendship with Steven Gerrard – another “joke”? Not to mention your “jokes” about celebrity subscribers to the Insider.
Of course with kids, as long as nobody’s hurt, it doesn’t really matter. They learn from it in most cases. But with a grown “man” in his 30s who’s going out of his way to either steal from people or hurt people, it DOES matter.
Which is why we carry on.