Does Oldham have the balls for porn?

by Rupert Insider

Newcomers might be forgiven for thinking that KopFalk – or whatever his new porno site is called – is a new venture for Duncan Oldham.

But even before KopTalk was a twinkle in his eye he was using a Usenet footie group to try to make porno videos on the cheap.

Take a look at this from Sunday – Sunday mind you! – 19th October 1997.

___________________________________________

		! UK Cple seek males for sex !!!!!!
Only 1 message in topic – view as tree

From:   NEastCple – view profile Rating: (1 user) show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author   Hi, sorry to but in on the footy but there must be some fit lads in here ?! We’re a young couple both aged 23 and living in Scarborough. We’re seeking an extremely fit and good looking individual to become a friend of ours and join us for plenty of sex either just a one off or for the rest of our lives !!!!! We’d like to film any encounter on our camcorder for our own use only, no need for your face on if you’re shy and there’s no reason why a copy couldn’t be sent on to the person that joins us. She is slim, dark haired, 34 B boobs and tanned. She loves wearing stockings and shoes etc. while having sex but she is a little shy. We would have to meet over here, we’d suggest a few drinks and then plenty of oral as she loves giving and receiving. He would either be looking on or joining in the fun. Safe sex and no pain stuff only of course. We’re both non-smokers and haven’t got a problem with a smoker as long as he doesn’t share his hobby while here !!!!! Right then, first of all she’d like to see a piccie so please email one or snail mail one to us at : Miss Hargreaves PO Box 145 Scarborough YO11 1YD See ya later Gill & Mark

________________________________________

Don’t let the master of pseudonyms fool you.

He was “Mark” and his new wife was “Gill”. You can check out the original post HERE. You can compare the PO Box numbers and names and addresses with others of his at that time HERE

It shows that even in those days he saw a connection between footie and porn.

Did anyone show up for the threesome back in 1997? If they did, and if some videos were made, will Oldham flog them now?

Is the new porno site a culmination of his decade long dream?

If KopFalk is to replace KopTalk as Oldham’s nice little earner, will he still need to be front and centre?

There are some precedents for fat men starring in porno. Ron Jeremy springs to mind – (no he doesn’t I had to look it up).

But Ron Jeremys drew attention away from his width by his length.

The thing is – how will Oldham measure up? It’s not a good sign that he had to look for “extremely fit and good looking individual” to satisfy his new wife when he himself was only 23.

But things change. And as this photo shows, he’s a hard guy now. But is he hard enough?  Does he have the balls to be front and centre on KopFalk?

He tells us he has been on a diet recently. We don’t know if he’s been taking the diet pills sold by RichT – the Oldham family retainer and major domo of Koptalk moderators.

Certainly, given Oldham’s access to spam, he shouldn’t have much trouble finding a cheap source of Viagra.

My main point is that the new porn site is not just a commercial venture. This is something Oldham has wanted to do for more than a decade. Its the fulfilment of a need – a strategy to deal with his inadequacy.

Koptalk was the means to this end.

When I first started contributing to this blog I made the point repeatedly that everything Oldham does is motivated by sex and money. Lately I’ve tended to concentrate on the money. But its time to look again at the sex angle.

In 1997 not only would he pimp his new wife, he would video the action and join in – if he was lucky enough to find someone who’d let him.

And that has been a major characteristic of his history with Koptalk. Not satisfied with making an exhibition of his family – mother, dead father, step-brother, wife, kids and “cousin” – and not satisfied with insisting that LFC fans pay for access to a site which they themselves ran – he also wanted the personal satisfaction of joining in.

This need to join in had at least two aspects.

First he actually saw Koptalk as a means to satisfy his sexual frustrations. It gave him “status” with pub barmaids, and with young girls on MySpace and other internet chat venues, and with swinging couples in motorway rest-areas where he sported his Mercedes like the phallic symbol it was intended to be .

It gave him vicarious sexual satisfaction on Koptalk to force the attention of strangers from all over the world on his sexual needs. Usually he would beg for pity, apparently conceding his personal unattractiveness and sexual inadequacies, while at the same time claiming that this was merely a seduction technique and that, in reality, he was a prancing stallion.

And Koptalk gave him the opportunity to “interview” photographic models and dress them in the footie-kit of his fantasies. Who could forget his public slavering when he was interviewing models and his insinuations that it gave him sexual access to them. There were echoes of that same slavering in his many posts about his intended hiring last August of “Katie” – whom he constantly referred to as “blonde and only 18 years of age”. Oddly enough, it turns out she was no more than 17 years of age, if what Katrina writes on her web site is to be believed.

Koptalk also gave him a “cover” to talk repeatedly about his dark preoccupation – the rape of young girls. Starting with an outrageous claim that his then 8 year old daughter had been raped at school, he was unable to let go of the theme over the ensuing six years, returning to it repeatedly on what is supposed to be a football site.

Last summer he detailed the alleged reactions of the same girl to the televised news that a notorious paedophile rapist had been living next door for years. And then he staged a podcast stunt in which he instructed the 16 year old Steve to ask him how sick he was and Oldham replied that he was sick enough to have two of his (named) daughter’s 12 year old friends in bed with him. A strange joke for someone with his history.

Earlier in the summer he had spent ten minutes on his Koptalk internet show reading aloud to listeners, who had tuned in for news on LFC, a detailed News of the World story about a convicted child rapist photographed oggling school girls in a park. Putting the paper aside he lectured his then 16 year old step-brother and his audience that there was nothing wrong with that – the girls should not have been in the park and, furthermore, he had come to appreciate why men rape young girls because when you get to his age they ignore you.

And repeatedly he returns to the theme of the “grooming” of girls – including his now 13 yr old daughter – on the internet. This is usually followed by extravagant threats of violence to anybody who might be involved.

Most fathers would not expose their children on the net in the way he does, and most would not need to boast about how angry they would be if their children were groomed or “attacked”. It would be obvious.

Oldham’s exaggerated bluster is suspicious.

It is doubly suspicious when we see him giving the same daughter, and his even younger son, complete access to Koptalk and the status of Moderators.

As we know, Koptalk is a site used mainly by anonymous males from all over the world most of whom know quite a bit about Oldham’s young daughter and son, thanks to his constant disclosures about them.

Koptalk is also a site which uses sex to drum up hits – and it now invites its visitors to have a look at his new porn site.

Koptalk is a site where Oldham has posted photographs of his daughter – even when she was 8 years of age – even after he claimed that she was raped at school. Alarm bells begin to ring when we see him pretending to be his daughter, to deceive his readers, as recently as a month ago, using her login name as he used the name of his younger step-brother when he pretends to be him.

A 32 year old man pretending to be a teenager is not a healthy sign. It makes you wonder how often he has done it on other sites and for what purpose.

We also see on Koptalk his constant references to pornography and his claim that even when Steve was 16 years old Oldham’s main “payment” to him was “unrestricted access to porn” on the Koptalk computers when Steve slept over in the Koptalk shed – and don’t let’s forget his boast that he kept a video camera trained on the office all through the night “to keep an eye” on Steve.

Veterans of Koptalk will remember Oldham started his site from a PC in his daughter’s bedroom in Scarborough. One of its first features was a live webcam – accompanied by many simpering suggestions from him that Koptalk readers could watch around the clock.

The second aspect of his need to be involved has to do with his desire for control – to be a cult leader. But that desire also arises from his sexual frustrations which are associated with his low self-esteem. Cult leaders often demand involvement in the sexual life of their followers whom they often call their “family” as Oldham does. Oldham wants to be loved, admired and thanked by Koptalk members for giving them the privilege of being screwed by him. He also craves their unquestioning loyalty and obedience.

Name one other football site, or sports site, or any kind of commercial site in the world, where the owner puts himself and the intimate details of his family life and his sexual frustrations front and centre? There isn’t one other.

But money also colours Oldham’s motivations. To get sex for free and then profit from it is his dream.

That’s why he is now trying to convert KopTalk into KopFalk

Who should “Dunk knows best” blame for the Koptalk disaster?

by Honorary Insider

As Koptalk prepares to draw its last breath let us try to analyse where it all went wrong for “Dunk knows best” Oldham.

He won’t blame himself, that’s for sure. He will blame the nasty people at News Now for banning him from their site just because he used false and misleading headlines and manipulated their hit-counter.

He will blame all the misguided government agencies currently investigating him for dodgy and fraudulent activities – Inland Revenue & Customs, Trading Standards, Social Security Fraud Investigation Squad, the Police, the Charity Commissioners and Data Protection.

Strangely he wont blame this blog (well, not publicly) even though it was the blog which alerted LFC and News Now, the owners of the copyright he stole and all the government agencies.

His inflated ego wont let him admit that “a few dissatisfied former members”, by means of a simple weblog, could bring about the downfall of the “World’s No. 1 Sports Site” that was Koptalk.

He wont blame the blog publicly because that would be to contradicate his oft-repeated claim that “I welcome the publicity”. He even claimed at one time that the blog was sending “to record levels” the number of new members signing up for £30 memberships. But that was another lie, wasn’t it Duncan?

In the early days of the blog, he used to end his posts with the sneer “blog that!”. Strangely he hasn’t used that phrase in quite a while.

He certainly won’t blame the fact that he used to run Koptalk as though he was a leader of a cult, banning and suspending members on a whim and refusing to refund their money.

He wont blame the fact that he was constantly putting himself and his dysfunctional family to the centre of attention on his site.

He wont blame the fact that he ran many dodgy charity scams that he failed to account for and many competitions no one ever seemed to win.

He will not blame the fact that he sold fake LFC memorabilia (often supposedly for charity) and provided bogus certificates of authenticity signed by his then 16 year old step brother Steve McNeish.

He wont blame the fact that he constantly pleaded poverty , claiming every penny he earned was ploughed back into the site “for the benefit of the members”, and then some weeks later bragged about expensive cars and the high tech gadgets he had bought for himself.

He will not blame the fact that he banned a well respected poster and one of the few people on Koptalk with some genuine inside information, a guy called Tom, for daring to suggest some improvements to his site.

He will not blame the fact that for three years he took £5 deposits on his never-to-be-written book, “Anfield Exposed”, and recently admitted that he still has not written a word of it.

And he will not blame the fact that his entire site was founded on a Big Lie.

The fact is that he does not and never has had “inside information” from anyone inside Anfield, Melwood or the Academy or anything or anyone else associated with Liverpool Football Club – no, not even from a gateman or a tea lady

Duncan, they say “It isn’t over till the fat lady sings”. Well she hasn’t started singing yet but she has cleared her throat in readiness and the sound checks are complete.