How many aliases can one ‘man’ have?

Is this the record for the most aliases used in one thread by Oldham? He starts off pretending to be “The Informer”, then he answers as “NJRED” and also as himself, “Dunk”. No doubt he was wearing his Katie-wig at the time.

The Informer
Honorary Member

Reged: Jul 14 2003
Posts: 139
Loc: Liverpool

Kuyt agent
#1565140 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:38 PM

The horse says he’s meeting Dirk Kuyts agent tomorrow in Liverpool.

Feyenoord have until Tuesday to accept our final offer. They had not made a decision either way up until yesterday.

The horse says he has to be at Melwoods training facilities on Tuesday afternoon and needs to know what is happening with Kuyt before then.

I will be at the stadium tomorrow as part of the adidas link up and will try and obtain more news.
————————————
kop88
Silver Member

Reged: Jun 19 2004
Posts: 118

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565143 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:40 PM

cheers for the update
————————————
KAC
Silver Member

Reged: Mar 08 2003
Posts: 5
Loc: ShuoZhou, Shanxi, PR Chain

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565144 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:40 PM

————————————
Easystrider71
Gold Member

Reged: Jan 28 2005
Posts: 668
Loc: Peckham Rye

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565149 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:42 PM

Very many thanks, mate.
————————————
Markb1
Gold Member

Reged: Jul 07 2005
Posts: 1076
Loc: DUBLIN

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565153 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:44 PM

cheers pal anything on the alves/pennant situation other than whats been in the papers.
————————————
NJRED
Gold Member

Reged: Jul 22 2006
Posts: 14

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565156 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:45 PM

I heard that the player is prepared to sign for us on just 28,000 a week. If that’s true you’d think the club would take this into account with the fee as it will save quite a bit over his contract period.
————————————
janerik
Gold Member

Reged: Jul 11 2005
Posts: 986
Loc: Norway

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: NJRED]
#1565171 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:52 PM

Who’s the horse?
————————————
ArmchairKopite
Gold Member

Reged: Apr 27 2005
Posts: 896
Loc: The Office

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: janerik]
#1565174 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:54 PM

Quote:

Who’s the horse?

Your mother
————————————
worksopdanic
Gold Member

Reged: May 15 2006
Posts: 651
Loc: Southgate, London

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565175 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:54 PM

Who’s the Horse? is that your informant?
————————————
Fredo
Honorary Member

Reged: Jul 01 2003
Posts: 5500
Loc: Home sweet home

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: janerik]
#1565176 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:54 PM

Quote:

Who’s the horse?

Someone with a ‘big brown nose with opened nostrils’ who have the power to sign blank cheques at the club.
————————————
matycowling100
Gold Member

Reged: Jan 18 2006
Posts: 507

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565178 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:55 PM

Cheers informer
————————————
NJRED
Gold Member

Reged: Jul 22 2006
Posts: 14

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: janerik]
#1565180 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:55 PM

Horses live in stables and there’s a saying from the stable which I think means from the inside. I think this is what he means. I’m not sure though. Why not just say who the person is rather than calling them a horse!
————————————
ArmchairKopite
Gold Member

Reged: Apr 27 2005
Posts: 896
Loc: The Office

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: The Informer]
#1565183 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:56 PM

OOhh on a Sunday n’ all
————————————
Dunk
KopTalk Editor

Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8732
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Kuyt agent  [Re: NJRED]
#1565185 – Sun Jul 23 2006 03:57 PM

Quote:

Horses live in stables and there’s a saying from the stable which I think means from the inside. I think this is what he means. I’m not sure though. Why not just say who the person is rather than calling them a horse!

“This came from the horse’s mouth” so to speak.. that’s how I understand this. Sometimes it’s not possible or not advisable to name names.

So when do Liverpool leave the country to hit the Swiss training camp then? Tuesday.

Rod-cast.

Duncan’s done a Podcast. Not only does he steal other people’s content, he steals other people’s ideas. So as he’s taken our idea of a podcast and used it himself, we’ve taken a piece of digital audio that seems to be his idea of a podcast and put it onto our own podcast thing.

You can download it here -

http://www.switchpod.com/users/koptalk/ee9b2d69-9794-36f2-ab15-a9f015d305b4.mp3

(Don’t worry, that’s our own copy of it.)

If you want the xml version of it, we’ve put it here -

http://www.switchpod.com/users/koptalk/feed.xml

There’s a whole load of other ways to use the feed here – http://www.switchpod.com/p3243.html

I’ve actually only listened to a total of maybe 20 seconds. I hated every second of it. Isn’t that a line from Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy? From Marvin? Actually Oldham’s podcast is probably worse than Vogon poetry.

But you might like it. So please, try and listen to some of it and report back. Maybe get your friends to help you. It’s 46 minutes long, so if you can find 45 friends you’ve only got to listen to one minute each.

You won’t have 45 friends left afterwards though.

More features removed from Koptalk’s software.

More features taken away from Koptalk users. Is the server such poor quality that he has to take actions like these? Or is he trying to stop people find more evidence against him? He deletes posts for no reason sometimes, other than he’s said something in there which maybe he regretted.

amspa
Gold Member

Reged: Aug 03 2004
Posts: 5

FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?
#1564446 – Sat Jul 22 2006 08:26 PM

Why has the maximum date range on the search been changed from 2 years to 1 day?

This effectively means that we can no longer search for posts.

Has this been done for any particular reason?
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

rnm
Gold Member

Reged: Jun 17 2005
Posts: 1599
Loc: Loc: Loc: Loc: Loc:

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: amspa]
#1564474 – Sat Jul 22 2006 08:54 PM

i use that all the time
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Dunk
KopTalk Editor

Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8717
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: rnm]
#1564475 – Sat Jul 22 2006 08:57 PM

We’re making changes on all the sites every day. For example, we did that yesterday but added the Games Arcade. Everything will be in order for the new season. We’re just tinkering to get stuff right
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

amspa
Gold Member

Reged: Aug 03 2004
Posts: 5

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: rnm]
#1564477 – Sat Jul 22 2006 08:58 PM

Hopefully they’re just working on it and it’ll be back to normal soon.

Anything other than that and it’s a bad, bad move.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

amspa
Gold Member

Reged: Aug 03 2004
Posts: 5

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: amspa]
#1564478 – Sat Jul 22 2006 08:59 PM

Fair enough!
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Dunk
KopTalk Editor

Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8717
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: amspa]
#1564497 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:20 PM

Full searching will return. We’re just enabling and disabling things to see what’s best and to see if the server can handle things.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Fredo
Honorary Member

Reged: Jul 01 2003
Posts: 5476
Loc: Home sweet home

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: Dunk]
#1564507 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:27 PM

Have a question. What more features will the new software (PHP BB ??) have over that one ? I feel UBB Threads rocks mate … from a user’s point of view anyway. Dabbled with the free site and found it less exciting than this one.

Anyway, does it gives you much more admin usability ?
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

rnm
Gold Member

Reged: Jun 17 2005
Posts: 1599
Loc: Loc: Loc: Loc: Loc:

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: Fredo]
#1564549 – Sat Jul 22 2006 10:07 PM

that mon(k)ey drop is damn addictive
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Dunk
KopTalk Editor

Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8717
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: FAO Dunk: Change to the site’s search feature?  [Re: Fredo]
#1564574 – Sat Jul 22 2006 10:27 PM

Quote:

Have a question. What more features will the new software (PHP BB ??) have over that one ? I feel UBB Threads rocks mate … from a user’s point of view anyway. Dabbled with the free site and found it less exciting than this one.

Anyway, does it gives you much more admin usability ?

The general feedback seems to be that people like this software so I’m considering not converting to anything else as I had planned. Moving to another format would be very time consuming, it would be a big gamble and people would probably not like the change.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Looks like his plan to use FusionBB on multiple sites after paying for just one licence has backfired after all. That’s what it looks like, maybe it’s not the case, but that’s what it looks like. (New users may not realise that the owners of the FusionBB package were warned that Duncan had installed the software on more than one server, and to check that he’d actually paid for it. Although they said they knew all about Dunk’s plans, it’s likely that they didn’t know about his  real plans. And now they’re keeping an eye on him.)

The sad thing about him breaking the search function is that many of his users use that feature to remind themselves of insider information posted on the site, real or not. Without that facility half of the fun will be lost. Another nail in Koptalk’s coffin, but Dunk Thinks He Knows Best.

Is this the same Roscoe from the free forum? He’s not happy at the censorship anyway.

Roscoe
Silver Member

Reged: Mar 16 2005
Posts: 683
Loc: Dublin

Why is it …..
#1564524 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:49 PM          Reply

that 50% of the time I post on a thread the bloody thing gets deleted ?

The moderation on this site is a joke.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

andym172
Silver Member

Reged: May 28 2002
Posts: 566
Loc: Liverpool

Re: Why is it ….. [Re: Roscoe]
#1564530 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:52 PM          Reply

Anybody care to predict where this thread is going?

Give me a B
Give me a I
Give me a N
Give me a N
Give me a E
Give me a D

What does it spell?
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Roscoe
Silver Member

Reged: Mar 16 2005
Posts: 683
Loc: Dublin

Re: Why is it ….. [Re: andym172]
#1564532 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:54 PM          Reply

I’m being completely genuine.

I’m a mod on the free site, but every time I post something even slightly argumentative the thread gets deleted. I’d love to know who hasn’t got a clue how to Mod.

*looks in Shelly’s direction*
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

andym172
Silver Member

Reged: May 28 2002
Posts: 566
Loc: Liverpool

Re: Why is it ….. [Re: Roscoe]
#1564534 – Sat Jul 22 2006 09:56 PM          Reply

I won’t have a bad word said against Shelly. She’s a gem, and Koptalk’s lucky to have her
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Roscoe
Silver Member

Reged: Mar 16 2005
Posts: 683
Loc: Dublin

Re: Why is it ….. [Re: andym172]
#1564545 – Sat Jul 22 2006 10:04 PM          Reply

Well maybe it wasn’t her …this time.

I posted saying that Rafa had made some mistakes and the thread got deleted shortly afterwards.

It’s funny though because nowhere in the AUP does it say that you can’t criticse Rafa. Mods should know the AUP inside out and be aware of the value of freedom of expression.

Anyway, that’s my bit said. I’m off to the free site.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Dunk
KopTalk Editor

Reged: Aug 20 2004
Posts: 8717
Loc: KOPTALK

Re: Why is it ….. [Re: Roscoe]
#1564562 – Sat Jul 22 2006 10:17 PM          Reply

Quote:

Well maybe it wasn’t her …this time.

I posted saying that Rafa had made some mistakes and the thread got deleted shortly afterwards.

It’s funny though because nowhere in the AUP does it say that you can’t criticse Rafa. Mods should know the AUP inside out and be aware of the value of freedom of expression.

Anyway, that’s my bit said. I’m off to the free site.

Maybe one of your fellow forum members hijacked it. And don’t start on Shelley. No need for it.

Nobody would have a thread removed for criticising any LFC manager or player providing it was constructive. That would go against everything I believe. I’m all for negative or positive opinions of the team and the staff. That’s the whole point of the forum.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - 

And when Dunk can up his hits with plenty of negative stuff about Liverpool he’ll jump straight in there to do that. Just don’t say anything negative about him – which might be what Dunk means by “hijacked”.

Koptalk make one refund.

The first version of this blog started off in March. Four months or so, getting more and more hits over time. Unfortunately the biggest part of the blog has been all about negative stuff. Believe it or not, I’d have been happy if at the start of this Duncan had just realised he was being watched, then sorted out things like the support for The Sun, The fake insider information, the theft of other people’s articles and so on. He couldn’t do it though. As a result his site is plummeting in popularity. He can deny it, but look at his desperate measures to try and up the post counts on his forums. Games on the Gold Club – but you’ve got be over a certain number of posts to play them. (Well you don’t really have to – it’s easy enough to go straight to the SWF files for each game instead – but he probably doesn’t realise that.) On the “free” site he’s going for the tactic of making people stop lurking by letting them only post in another area of the site until they’ve got enough posts in. Then they’ve got to beg to be allowed to go higher.

Can anyone be arsed? Except some of our readers who are only doing it to keep an eye on things.

Anyway, I said Koptalk made a refund, so this is something positive. Someone had probably not realised he’d set their paypal account up to automatically re-charge for the next year. In fact this user, “Eth”, has two email addresses registered on Koptalk. We emailed both of them today. No reply yet (in case Dunk thinks it’s time for a ban) but we did notice one of the two addresses bounced. What’s the chances that the bouncing email address was set up on an auto-charge setting? The user decided to renew using the newer email address.

Fair play to Oldham though – he did keep his promise that he’d refund anyone who was charged twice. It’s a pity that you’ve got to find this out yourself though – Dunk’s systems are far too amateur for him to find out if you’ve paid at all, never mind twice. That was why he had to lock people out of his site – that and to try and catch us. Which he’s still not done.

Eth Gold Member
Reged: 29/06/05
Posts: 1558
Loc: Dun na nGall / Ireland
FAO Koptalkers
#1562561 – 21/07/06 04:45 PM
Giving feedback koptalk for a 2nd time this week!

Some of ya know me some of ya don’t…..

Its only a small thing but its something I’d like to highlight in the midst of the crap and allegations and accusations and putting down of this community thats going on this week.

I happened to notice this week that I made a balls up when paying my subscription through paypal and my sub was paid twice to Koptalk. All I had to do was get in contact with Ste via MSN and today that money has been refunded back to my account. I know its a no brainer but I think it highlights the fact that we’re dealing with decent and trustworthy BUSINESS people and fellow fans.

You will never hear me slag off other sites (which I am a member of almost all) or will I blacken the name of people no matter what they write – often I pity their short sightedness.

I find it good value here, the customer service is excellent, SMS Alerts are worth the subscription alone – the community is diverse and friendly.

Read the AUP – if you agree with them I recommend you join the GC – if not there are absolutely loads of other sites that may suit your needs better.

Attacking a man and worse still his family because he has chosen to build a successful business by doing something he enjoyed? – Shame, take a look at the big picture, take a walk outside, look at your own family. Think.

There are alternatives out there for you.

This is all I have to say on the matter

Dunk again I congratulate you on what you have going here – long may it last and long may you and your family prosper from the risks that you take.

Eth.
- – - – - – - – -

We emailed Eth to ask if he’d seen the blog. Maybe he had, maybe he hadn’t. It just didn’t sound like someone who’d read the blog would go out of his way to say all of that. If you know Eth, email him and tell him your points on why the blog is so popular. He’s not replied to us, but he seems to have fallen for all of Duncan’s unfounded, untrue, unproven propaganda.

This is the part that saddens me most. “Attacking a man and worse still his family because he has chosen to build a successful business by doing something he enjoyed? – Shame, take a look at the big picture, take a walk outside, look at your own family. Think.”

Eth we do think. I look at my own family and think how much I love them and how I don’t want them to come to any harm. I think of all the things I’ve done over the years to protect them. It’s not the place of the blog to go into my personal troubles and triumphs, or the details of my family. But I would never, never put my own children’s safety in danger. Not for anything. Duncan claims all kinds of nasty things have happened to his kids as result of this blog. He says he’s got photos of his kids that have been doctored. He says he’s had threats to his family. He made claims in the past against people who tried to “out” him that were of a much more serious nature about his children. Despite all this, he decided to use his daughter on his Gold Club site tonight. She was posting (or he was posting pretending to be her, you can’t always tell). If he’d really had the threats he’d said, would she be allowed anywhere near his site? Not if he was a responsible parent.

One day his children will see him for what he is. At the moment they probably trust his every word, but given time they’ll realise things don’t add up. They’ll realise he’s used them. Does his daughter know what he’s claimed about her in the past? As someone on here posted earlier in the comments, it makes you quite angry. It’s no exaggeration at all to say that his attitude towards his children makes him the biggest threat they face. I won’t say, “I hope he’s proud of this”, because I don’t hope that. I hope he snaps out of his anti-depressant haze and realises what he’s doing. I hope his mother sees what he’s doing and snaps him out of it. Where’s his wife these days? Surely a mother can see what’s happening.

If you’ve got children you’ll probably understand my fears. He lives in a fantasy world and needs to be kept an eye on. I have seriously considered contacting social services in Newcastle about it, but I’d rather his own family tried to sort him out first. I know they read this blog (when he’s not looking) so I hope they can.

Duncan’s response to his user, the one who clearly doesn’t realise the extent of what Oldham’s done, was typical fantasy. There are so few users left on his forums now that his words are having a smaller and smaller impact.

Dunk KopTalk Editor
Reged: 20/08/04
Re: FAO Koptalkers [Re: Eth]
#1563715 – 22/07/06 01:04 PM
Please submit feedback by email or you will be covered in hot tar and feathers, dragged outside and then banned. (No – submit negative feedback so that you can be banned quietly. Submit positive feedback so that Duncan can big himself up.)

Seriously, every single day we receive hundreds of emails and support tickets. These can be about subs, help, enquiries, refund requests (from overpayments like yourself), suppliers, friends, contacts. It takes ages to go through them all. I have 425 emails pending as I type this, there’s that many because I choose to respond to everyone personally who has supported me/us over the years. This is called respect. It takes time to deal with people but we try and prioritise them. (I wonder if he’s included the weight-loss pills and viagra emails in those).

Our current aim is to respond to support tickets within 24 hours although this is an absolute deadline, during the day we try to respond within an hour or two. The average is probably 6 hours.

(Here’s how Duncan makes sure he’s nominated for the title of worst employer in Britain.) I decided to make Steve contactable at the office 7 days a week. Sometimes though he ventures out, after all he does have a life. Even so though he takes 2 mobiles with him. His own and the KopTalk one so that he can say “Look, I’m just out mate but I’ll sort this for you a.s.a.p.”

We have worked hard as a team improving support because we know it’s frustrating if you need help. This is why I also have Steve on MSN nearly every hour of every day apart from when he’s in bed. Most nights Steve gets around 5 hours sleep. He’ll finish at 2 and then he’ll be back in here at 7, and this is 7 days a week. I also work similar hours. He is the most valued member of the team. (Of course Duncan’s lying, Steve spends nothing like that sort of time doing Oldham’s dirty work. Over 130 hours a week? Nothing of the sort. But if he does then he’s entitled to the minimum wage.)

(Next is Duncan’s long-standing line about who attacks him and his site. How long’s he been saying it? I’m still not banned. From any of his forums. And does this site look like a “rival” to Koptalk? It’s a broken record for some of you to hear me say this, but it needs pointing out for any newcomers. I don’t want to give too much away, but I chose to keep quiet when I found out the truth about Duncan, and as a result he never worked out who I was. I wasn’t prepared to stand up and be shot straight down by Duncan’s moderator army! I started the revolution instead!)

The only people that ever have a bad word off about us are people who have tried it on, former (banned) members (from either here or the main site forums) or people associated to rival websites. There has also been stuff because we are ‘out of towners’. We can handle it all. After all we all have our own lives. I just think people take things far too seriously. We treat people like they treat us. (The stuff about “out of towners” is designed to win him favour from his many “out of town” members. We aren’t bothered about where he’s from though – it’s him that keeps pretending he’s moving to Liverpool. He’s been saying that for years. He was about to open a bar in Formby once. Now he’s interested in buying Chris Waddle’s Liverpool home. Stop laughing.)

If someone comes to me with a sincere complaint or gripe I listen. (Your treatment of Tom is one example from years of proof of how that is a lie. You think you know best. Your arrogance will be the end of your sites.) But I don’t suffer fools. Topics that I feel are either posted to rock the boat some how or basically stir, are pulled and they would be elsewhere. If someone wants to leave, leave why be all dramatic like some 13-year-old girl. (Maybe it was at this point he decided his own 13-year-old girl would be making an appearance.) Tell me if you want to moan because the majority of the members don’t really care. (Is that right? It isn’t actually, Dunk Knows Jack-shit).

(The next bit has been fairly true over the years, but I really don’t think he’s faced such an intense campaign as this before). Popular figures come and go. It goes in stages. But they are always replaced. It’s life. Sadly Chinese whispers kick in and before you know it I’m the anti-Christ and this is why I’m handing over these decisions to Steve. He’s 17 and he couldn’t care less who wants to moan. I don’t either but when you’re caught up with it all it takes up time that I could be spending on improving the site. (Instead of improving the site he’s making it worse – so say many people who used to like his site).

Many new members have come to me complaining of a clique mentality. In one way you can’t help this because friends of a year or two will have a laugh. There’s no problem with that but sometimes they do over step the mark. Thankfully this is improving a lot and members feel this because they tell us. (Nobody likes a clique – especially not Duncan. Duncan doesn’t like his forum members to be too friendly with each other, because that’s how the truth about him spreads. He can turn of private messaging and hide email addresses by changing a PHP file, but he can’t stop those who already had each other’s email addresses from speaking to each other.)

(Now for some classic Koptalk Bullshit.) Fortunately the majority keep us informed of who is doing and saying what and this is helpful as we keep an eye on folk. Sometimes people can’t understand a decision we make but sometimes we can’t divulge reasons even though if we did, people would understand or support us more so. It’s frustrating when sometimes you can’t be upfront but there are legal issues so we can’t just go spouting off. (You mean you are a lying tyrant who won’t tell any of his users how he’s a long-time conman).

Everyone who participates on KopTalk either here or on the free sites is a guest. They do not have licence to do or say what they want. (Another classic piece of Koptalk excuse-making. If you compare Koptalk to a pub, Duncan is trying to make out he’s banned people for smashing glasses and breaking tables. In truth he’s banned them for daring to suggest any form of change to the way the pub works. Not for demanding it, for suggesting it.)

(I’ll not comment (again) on this one too much. Do a search on Google Groups for (“po box 145″ scarborough). In fact, click this. It’s just an example. And he’s clearly a violent angry individual at times, as he often tells us, and tells us here. He’s actually spoken in an email to someone about the people behind this blog, saying when he catches them he’ll “rip their faces off”. Nice man, nice man.) Allegations made against myself are laughable. The only things I’ve ever been in trouble for is criminal damage when a taxi driver nearly crashed into my car when Charlotte was a tot. I even went to the police station and turned myself in 10 minutes later and the next day in court the magistrates said “If only everyone was like you. You saved the police a lot of time”. All I had to do was pay for his window I have a driving conviction from around 1994/5 and that’s about it. A right Ronnie Biggs I am. My late father and late grandather (both Police Inspectors) would have disowned me… not.

The rivalry towards KopTalk has intensified since we started getting more organised. In November last year we started removing people who had managed to stay in. We’ve got rid of loads of them. (Not sure what he means about this, but I’ll just point out one thing. You’ve not got rid of us.)

Next season will be a massive step-up for us. I can’t say why because I know my everyword is lifted and pasted all over the net. (He can’t say why because he’s not sorted anything out yet.) Hopefully you will see why as the season progresses. But remember, we’re just football fans. KopTalk was just a mailing list and it evolved into a website. All from a hobby and my love of LFC.. I wasn’t prepared for such a transition and yeh (his spelling of “yeh” again, just him and Katie spell it this way) mistakes have been made but you can only learn from them. (That is the biggest problem for you Duncan. That’s why this blog’s here and your member numbers are plummetting. Your hits are falling. Because you will not learn. You refuse to stop the dodgy stuff.) An angel I’m not but I don’t take **** from anyone and people don’t like that. (I just don’t like the “****” you give to your innocent members).

(And on it goes…)

I always say if there’s a problem or if someone has genuine feedback bring it to us. We’re contactable nearly all the time.

( … )

Nobody gets banned for nothing, either from here or the main site. Anyone who says such is telling porkies or twisting the truth a little. You can only ban yourself. (Liar.)

I would like to thank you for yoru supportive comments above which I will close because I prefer positive and negative feedback to come through by email. Otherwise people will be accused of brown-nosing. (You close positive feedback, before someone adds anything negative, but you don’t delete it. Negative feedback is deleted and the user banned immediately. That’s the truth.)

The football season is nearly here thank God and I will be drawing a line under the issue. (You’d like to draw a line under the issue. Do you think we will? Not until you sort yourself out. We’re still waiting for you to send us an email. In confidence if you prefer.) I’m very happy for people to discuss KopTalk or myself and family like they already do on other sites, that shows the sort of people that frequent them. Anyone who chooses to manipulate photographs of my children (6 and 13) shows the level of these people. (He’s still claiming this. Have you seen any of these? I’m not saying they don’t exist, but I really can’t see that they do. And who’s sent them? I’d even be prepared to help find the culprit if they were as bad as he makes out. The truth is though, as we say above, Duncan Oldham does not give a shit about the safety or welfare of his children if the way he uses them in his campaign to make money is anything to go by). You will never see anyone here discussing others and I certainly won’t allow forum members to put down other sites. They want to rival KopTalk, we don’t want to rival anyone. We just want to spend our lives trying to make our supporters happy by providing as much as we can about LFC. (Should we repost your comments about Chris Bascombe? Or do you want us to post your criticism of the site you are the most jealous of? The Official Site? Oldham once claimed it was his idea to have a webcam at Anfield. Liverpool FC wouldn’t want any webcam of his anywhere near their premises.)

——————–
DunkKnowsShit.com
Post Extras:
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
JD Koptalk’s Rent Boy
Reged: 12/12/04
Posts: 11617
Loc: Cambridgeshire
Re: FAO Koptalkers [Re: Eth]
#1563719 – 22/07/06 01:05 PM
I am sure Dunk will want to use some of this if not at all for the feedback section mate.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Dunk KopTalk Editor
Re: FAO Koptalkers [Re: JD]
#1563744 – 22/07/06 01:18 PM
I’ve just spoke to me mam about this post as she’s been following it all over the last few weeks. (Here we go again… His mam is one of the people who received an email from us in the past. Questions about Duncan. She was contacted through the email address provided by Koptalk to discuss issues with the Gold Club.)

She is basically responsible for the running of the office in that she makes sure Steve and Katie (and even myself!) are doing what they’re supposed to. She’s basically my PA and who better to have. (Duncan – Katie does not exist. You made her up. The longer you go on about this imaginary 18-year-old friend of yours the longer you will look a dickhead. But you seem to think you know best.)

She was really happy with these comments when I read them down the phone and we’re going to print them off and put on the office wall, Rafa style. (He lives over the road from his mum. So he phones her. No wonder he’s struggling with his weight.)

Every day she speaks to Steve (I hope she does, she’s his stepmum and he lives in her house) and reminds him of the importance of everyone “These people put food in your fat gob” she reminds him when he sighs when he’s under a bit of pressure. (Not for much longer though Duncan, you’ve been shitting on them for far too long.)

Nobody will ever know how much we appreciate the people who support us. (They do know. As soon as they say anything even remotely questionable.)

——————–
DunkTransVest.com

Sorry for such a long post, but we felt it was worth repeating some facts for those who’ve just found the blog for the first time. We’re starting to make use of the list of email address we have access to. That’s where we got hold of Eth’s email address, and I hope he does find time to read the blog before he reads more of Dunk’s propaganda. It’s a pity Dunk didn’t just say, “No worries, of course we’ll refund you if you’ve been charged twice”. It would have made this a positive post for him.